Advertisement

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 471, Issue 2, pp 600–605 | Cite as

Validation of the Korean Version of the Oxford Knee Score in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Il Soo Eun
  • Ok Gul Kim
  • Chang Kyu Kim
  • Hong Seok Lee
  • Jung Sub LeeEmail author
Clinical Research

Abstract

Background

Although translated versions of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in several languages are available, the absence of a Korean version precludes comparing data from Korea with that from other countries using the OKS.

Questions/purposes

We therefore evaluated the reliability and validity of the adapted Korean version of the OKS.

Methods

We first translated the English version of the OKS into Korean, then back into English, then held expert committee discussions to finalize the Korean version. We then mailed the Korean version of the VAS for pain, OKS, and the previously validated SF-36 to 142 patients who underwent TKAs for knee osteoarthritis. Factor analysis and reliability assessment using the kappa statistic of agreement for each item, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and Cronbach’s alpha were conducted. To determine the subscales of the OKS, we used the factor analysis. We also evaluated concurrent and construct validity by comparing the responses to the OKS with the results of the VAS and SF-36 using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Results

All items had a kappa statistic of agreement greater than 0.6. The OKS showed test and retest reliability as follows: OKS, 0.848; Factor 1, 0.867; and Factor 2, 0.819. Internal consistency of Cronbach’s alpha was as follows: OKS, 0.932; Factor 1, 0.907; Factor 2, 0.867. The OKS correlated (r = 0.692) with the VAS. The Korean version of the OKS correlated with the SF-36 total and individual domain (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain) scores.

Conclusions

The adapted Korean version of the OKS was translated and showed acceptable measurement properties. The data suggest it is suitable for assessing outcomes in Korean-speaking patients having TKAs.

Keywords

Kappa Statistic Retest Reliability Divergent Validity Oxford Knee Score Korean Version 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff from the outpatient clinics, and the patients who participated in this study. We also thank Sang Sup Lee PhD, Jerry G. Gebhard PhD, Sam Cho MD, Shi Hwan Park MD, and Tae Sik Goh MD for help with the translation process.

References

  1. 1.
    Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3186–3191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Charoencholvanich K, Pongcharoen B. Oxford knee score and SF-36: translation & reliability for use with total knee arthroscopy patients in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88:1194–1202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:63–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L. Translation and validation of the Oxford-12 item knee score for use in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:268–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fayers PM, Machin D. Factor analysis. Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2000:91–116.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goncalves RS, Tomas AM, Martins DI. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Knee. 2012;19:344–347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Han CW, Lee EJ, Iwaya T, Kataoka H, Kohzuki M. Development of the Korean version of Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey: health related QOL of healthy elderly people and elderly patients in Korea. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2004;203:189–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haverkamp D, Breugem SJ, Sierevelt IN, Blankevoort L, van Dijk CN. Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire for knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:347–352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hochberg MC, Altman RD, Brandt KD, Clark BM, Dieppe PA, Griffin MR, Moskowitz RW, Schnitzer TJ. Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis: Part I. Osteoarthritis of the knee. American College of Rheumatology. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:1535–1540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hochberg MC, Altman RD, Brandt KD, Clark BM, Dieppe PA, Griffin MR, Moskowitz RW, Schnitzer TJ. Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis: Part II. Osteoarthritis of the knee. American College of Rheumatology. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:1541–1546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karlson EW, Katz JN, Liang MH. Chronic rheumatic disorders. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1996:1029–1037.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liang MH, Jette AM. Measuring functional ability in chronic arthritis: a critical review. Arthritis Rheum. 1981;24:80–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Sieverding M, Loibl M, von Knoch F, Mannion AF, Leunig M, Munzinger U. The 12-item Oxford Knee Score: cross-cultural adaptation into German and assessment of its psychometric properties in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17:49–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Reilly S, Doherty M. Signs, symptoms laboratory tests. In: Brandt KD, Doherty M, Lohmander LS, eds. Osteoarthritis. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003:197–210.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Padua R, Zanoli G, Ceccarelli E, Romanini E, Bondi R, Campi A. The Italian version of the Oxford 12-item Knee Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Int Orthop. 2003;27:214–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Takeuchi R, Sawaguchi T, Nakamura N, Ishikawa H, Saito T, Goldhahn S. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Oxford 12-item knee score in Japanese. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:247–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xie F, Li SC, Lo NN, Yeo SJ, Yang KY, Yeo W, Chong HC, Fong KY, Thumboo J. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Singapore English and Chinese versions of the Oxford knee score (OKS) in knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15:1019–1024.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xie F, Ye H, Zhang Y, Liu X, Lei T, Li S. Extension from inpatients to outpatients: validity and reliability of the Oxford Knee Score in measuring health outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2011;14:206–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Il Soo Eun
    • 1
  • Ok Gul Kim
    • 1
  • Chang Kyu Kim
    • 1
  • Hong Seok Lee
    • 2
  • Jung Sub Lee
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryBusan Medical CenterBusanSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Research InstitutePusan National University School of MedicineBusanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations