Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 470, Issue 12, pp 3375–3382

Coxa Profunda: Is the Deep Acetabulum Overcovered?

  • Lucas A. Anderson
  • Ashley L. Kapron
  • Stephen K. Aoki
  • Christopher L. Peters
Symposium: ABJS Carl T. Brighton Workshop on Hip Preservation Surgery

Abstract

Background

Coxa profunda, or a deep acetabular socket, is often used to diagnose pincer femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Radiographically, coxa profunda is the finding of an acetabular fossa medial to the ilioischial line. However, the relative position of the acetabular fossa to the pelvis may not be indicative of acetabular coverage.

Questions/purposes

We therefore determined the incidence of coxa profunda and evaluated associations between coxa profunda and other radiographic parameters of acetabular coverage commonly used to diagnose pincer FAI and acetabular dysplasia.

Methods

We evaluated the radiographs of three cohorts for coxa profunda, lateral center edge (LCE) angle, acetabular index, posterior wall sign, and crossover sign. Data from 67 collegiate football players were collected prospectively (Cohort 1). We identified two patient cohorts through retrospective review of all 179 hips undergoing hip preservation surgery from 2002 to 2008 (83 periacetabular osteotomies [Cohort 2] and 96 surgical dislocation and osteochondroplasties [Cohort 3]).

Results

In all three cohorts, we detected no difference in the LCE angle or acetabular index between hips with and without coxa profunda. Coxa profunda existed in hips representing the spectrum of acetabular coverage measured by LCE angle (−18° to 60°) and acetabular orientation determined by the crossover sign.

Conclusions

Coxa profunda was a common radiographic finding in both symptomatic patients and asymptomatic football players. Coxa profunda existed in hips representing the spectrum of acetabular coverage and was not associated with an overcovered acetabulum. We conclude coxa profunda is unrelated to overcoverage and suggest its use in diagnosis of pincer FAI be abandoned in favor of other determinants of focal or general overcoverage.

Level of Evidence

Level III, diagnostic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson LA, Peters CL, Park BB, Stoddard GJ, Erickson JA, Crim JR. Acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular impingement: risk factors and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:305–313.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bardakos NV, Villar RN. Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement: a radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:162–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1012–1018.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beck M, Leunig M, Parvizi J, Boutier V, Wyss D, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement. Part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:67–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaule PE, Kim YJ, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ, Leunig M, Schoenecker PL, Millis MB. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(suppl 4):47–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Trousdale R, Kim YJ, Beaule PE, Morgan P, Steger-May K, Schoenecker PL, Millis M. Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:666–675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fadul DA, Carrino JA. Imaging of femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(suppl 1):138–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, Ganz K, Krugel N, Berlemann U. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip: a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1119–1124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh TS, Mast JW. A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias: technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;232:26–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:264–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Giori NJ, Trousdale R. Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:263–269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Palm H, Troelsen A. Prevalence of malformations of the hip joint and their relationship to sex, groin pain, and risk of osteoarthritis: a population-based survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1162–1169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Søballe K, Gebuhr P, Lund B. Radiographic case definitions and prevalence of osteoarthrosis of the hip: a survey of 4 151 subjects in the Osteoarthritis Substudy of the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:713–720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kang AC, Gooding AJ, Coates MH, Goh TD, Armour P, Rietveld J. Computed tomography assessment of hip joints in asymptomatic individuals in relation to femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1160–1165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kapron AL, Anderson AE, Aoki SK, Phillips LG, Petron DJ, Toth R, Peters CL. Radiographic prevalence of femoracetabular impingement in collegiate football players. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:e111(1–10).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kubiak-Langer M, Tannast M, Murphy SB, Siebenrock KA, Langlotz F. Range of motion in anterior femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;458:117–124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lequesne M, Malghem J, Dion E. The normal hip joint space: variations in width, shape, and architecture on 223 pelvic radiographs. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:1145–1151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martin RL, Kelly BT, Philippon MJ. Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:1304–1311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martin RL, Philippon MJ. Evidence of reliability and responsiveness for the hip outcome score. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:676–682.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mast JW, Brunner RL, Zebrack J. Recognizing acetabular version in the radiographic presentation of hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:48–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Neumann M, Cui Q, Siebenrock KA, Beck M. Impingement-free hip motion: the “normal” angle alpha after osteochondroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:699–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ochoa LM, Dawson L, Patzkowski JC, Hsu JR. Radiographic prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in a young population with hip complaints is high. Clinical Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2710–2714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parvizi J, Leunig M, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:561–570.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peters C, Erickson J, Hines J. Early results of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: the learning curve at an academic medical center. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1920–1926.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peters CL, Erickson JA. Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement with surgical dislocation and debridement in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1735–1741.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peters CL, Schabel K, Anderson L, Erickson J. Open treatment of femoroacetabular impingement is associated with clinical improvement and low complication rate at short-term followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:504–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Philippon M, Schenker M, Briggs K, Kuppersmith D. Femoroacetabular impingement in 45 professional athletes: associated pathologies and return to sport following arthroscopic decompression. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:908–914.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Philippon MJ, Stubbs AJ, Schenker ML, Maxwell RB, Ganz R, Leunig M. Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: osteoplasty technique and literature review. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1571–1580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Philippon MJ, Weiss DR, Kuppersmith DA, Briggs KK, Hay CJ. Arthroscopic labral repair and treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in professional hockey players. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:99–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pollard TC, Villar RN, Norton MR, Fern ED, Williams MR, Murray DW, Carr AJ. Genetic influences in the aetiology of femoroacetabular impingement: a sibling study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:209–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K. Retroversion of the acetabulum: a cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:281–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ruelle M, Dubois JL. [Protrusive malformation and its arthrotic complication. II. The arthrotic complication] [in French]. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1962;29:646–654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Siebenrock K, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;407:241–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis—what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1540–1552.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C, Burckhardt K, Langlotz F, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:182–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Weir A, de Vos RJ, Moen M, Holmich P, Tol JL. Prevalence of radiological signs of femoroacetabular impingement in patients presenting with long-standing adductor-related groin pain. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:6–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Werner CM, Copeland CE, Ruckstuhl T, Stromberg J, Turen CH, Kalberer F, Zingg PO. Radiographic markers of acetabular retroversion: correlation of the cross-over sign, ischial spine sign and posterior wall sign. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76:166–173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zebala LP, Schoenecker P, Clohisy J. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: a diverse disease with evolving treatment options. Iowa Orthop J. 2007;27:71–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucas A. Anderson
    • 1
  • Ashley L. Kapron
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stephen K. Aoki
    • 1
  • Christopher L. Peters
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiomechanicsUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations