Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 471, Issue 1, pp 181–188 | Cite as

The ACL in the Arthritic Knee: How Often Is It Present and Can Preoperative Tests Predict Its Presence?

  • Aaron J. Johnson
  • Stephen M. Howell
  • Christopher R. Costa
  • Michael A. Mont
Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society

Abstract

Background

TKA with retention of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) may improve kinematics and function. However, conflicting reports exist concerning the prevalence of intact ACLs at the time of TKA.

Questions/purposes

Therefore, we asked: (1) what was the ACL status at TKA; (2) what was the sensitivity and specificity of the Lachman test; (3) did MRI ACL integrity correlate with intraoperative observation; (4) did MRI tibial wear patterns correlate with ACL integrity; and (5) did ACL status depend on age or sex?

Methods

We evaluated 200 patients for ACL integrity at the time of TKA. All patients underwent a Lachman test under anesthesia. Intraoperatively, the ACL was characterized as intact, frayed, disrupted, or absent. In 100 patients, MRIs were performed, from which the ACL was graded as intact, indeterminate, or disrupted, and the AP location of tibial wear was categorized.

Results

The ACL was intact in 155 patients (78%). The Lachman test alone had poor diagnostic ability. The MRI predicted a tear, but we observed two ACLs with indeterminate status that were disrupted. All knees with anterior wear on the medial tibial condyle had an intact ACL (n = 45), and all knees with posterior wear on the medial tibial condyle had a disrupted ACL (n = 8).

Conclusions

Although the Lachman test alone had poor sensitivity, when combined with MRI they together provide a sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 99%, which we believe makes these reasonable tests for assessing ACL status in the arthritic knee.

References

  1. 1.
    Aglietti P, Buzzi R, De Felice R, Giron F. The Insall-Burstein total knee replacement in osteoarthritis: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:560–565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW. The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1328–1335.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Attfield SF, Wilton TJ, Pratt DJ, Sambatakakis A. Soft-tissue balance and recovery of proprioception after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:540–545.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bellemans J. Bicruciate-substituting and bicruciate-replacing arthroplasty of the knee: technique and results. In: Scuderi GR, Tria AJ Jr, eds. The Knee: A Comprehensive Review. Hackensack, NJ, USA: World Scientific; 2010.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Finlay JB, Nott L. Kinematic I and Oxford knee arthroplasty. A 5-8-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2:285–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:45–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. Long-term survivorship analysis of cruciate-sparing versus cruciate-sacrificing knee prostheses using meniscal bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;260:162–169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, Laan RF, Veth RP. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:740–747.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cash RM, Gonzalez MH, Garst J, Barmada R, Stern SH. Proprioception after arthroplasty: role of the posterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:172–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cloutier JM. Results of total knee arthroplasty with a non-constrained prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:906–919.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cloutier JM. Long-term results after nonconstrained total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:63–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cloutier JM, Sabouret P, Deghrar A. Total knee arthroplasty with retention of both cruciate ligaments. A nine to eleven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:697–702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cushner FD, La Rosa DF, Vigorita VJ, Scuderi GR, Scott WN, Insall JN. A quantitative histologic comparison: ACL degeneration in the osteoarthritic knee. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:687–692.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Daniel DM, Akeson WH, O’Connor JJ. Knee Ligaments: Structure, Function, Injury, and Repair. New York, NY, USA: Raven Press; 1990.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:114–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dickstein R, Heffes Y, Shabtai EI, Markowitz E. Total knee arthroplasty in the elderly: patients’ self-appraisal 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Gerontology. 1998;44:204–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dodd M, Trompeter A, Harrison T, Palmer S. The pivot shift test is of limited clinical relevance in the arthritic anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. J Knee Surg. 2010;23:131–135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hagena FW, Hofmann GO, Mittlmeier T, Wasmer G, Bergmann M. The cruciate ligaments in knee replacement. Int Orthop. 1989;13:13–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hallen LG, Lindahl O. The ‘screw-home’ movement in the knee-joint. Acta Orthop Scand. 1966;37:97–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harman MK, Markovich GD, Banks SA, Hodge WA. Wear patterns on tibial plateaus from varus and valgus osteoarthritic knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;352:149–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jenny JY, Jenny G. Preservation of anterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;118:145–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lafortune MA, Cavanagh PR, Sommer HJ 3rd, Kalenak A. Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking. J Biomech. 1992;25:347–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:151–156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee GC, Cushner FD, Vigoritta V, Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Scott WN. Evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament integrity and degenerative arthritic patterns in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:59–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Migaud H, Gougeon F, Diop A, Lavaste F, Duquennoy A. [Cinematic in vivo analysis of the knee: a comparative study of 4 types of total knee prostheses] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1995;81:198–210.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Montoy M, Euvrard T, Moyen B, Roy P, Rollier JC, Cotton F. Inter-observer agreement in the identification of the two bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Radiol Anat. 2008;30:557–562.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Noble PC, Gordon MJ, Weiss JM, Reddix RN, Conditt MA, Mathis KB. Does total knee replacement restore normal knee function? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;431:157–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Puloski SK, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Tibial post wear in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. An unrecognized source of polyethylene debris. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:390–397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Simmons S, Lephart S, Rubash H, Borsa P, Barrack RL. Proprioception following total knee arthroplasty with and without the posterior cruciate ligament. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:763–768.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Starman JS, Vanbeek C, Armfield DR, Sahasrabudhe A, Baker CL 3rd, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH. Assessment of normal ACL double bundle anatomy in standard viewing planes by magnetic resonance imaging. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:493–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Cloutier JM, Dennis DA. The cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty: a kinematic analysis of 2 total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:545–550.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Suda AJ, Seeger JB, Bitsch RG, Krueger M, Clarius M. Are patients’ expectations of hip and knee arthroplasty fulfilled? A prospective study of 130 patients. Orthopedics. 2010;33:76–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Todo S, Kadoya Y, Moilanen T, Kobayashi A, Yamano Y, Iwaki H, Freeman MA. Anteroposterior and rotational movement of femur during knee flexion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;362:162–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Torg JS, Conrad W, Kalen V. Clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament instability in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1976;4:84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wiertsema SH, van Hooff HJ, Migchelsen LA, Steultjens MP. Reliability of the KT1000 arthrometer and the Lachman test in patients with an ACL rupture. Knee. 2008;15:107–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aaron J. Johnson
    • 1
  • Stephen M. Howell
    • 2
  • Christopher R. Costa
    • 1
  • Michael A. Mont
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Joint Preservation and Reconstruction, Rubin Institute for Advanced OrthopedicsSinai Hospital of BaltimoreBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of California at DavisSacramentoUSA
  3. 3.Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, The Rubin Institute for Advanced OrthopedicsSinai Hospital of BaltimoreBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations