Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 471, Issue 1, pp 201–205

Is Administratively Coded Comorbidity and Complication Data in Total Joint Arthroplasty Valid?

  • Kevin J. Bozic
  • Ravi K. Bashyal
  • Shawn G. Anthony
  • Vanessa Chiu
  • Brandon Shulman
  • Harry E. Rubash
Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society

Abstract

Background

Administrative claims data are increasingly being used in public reporting of provider performance and health services research. However, the concordance between administrative claims data and the clinical record in lower extremity total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is unknown.

Questions/purposes

We evaluated the concordance between administrative claims and the clinical record for 13 commonly reported comorbidities and complications in patients undergoing TJA.

Methods

We compared 13 administratively coded comorbidities and complications derived from hospital billing records with clinical documentation from a consecutive series of 1350 primary and revision TJAs performed at three high-volume institutions during 2009.

Results

Concordance between administrative claims and the clinical record varied across comorbidities and complications. Concordance between diabetes and postoperative myocardial infarction was reflected by a kappa value > 0.80; chronic lung disease, coronary artery disease, and postoperative venous thromboembolic events by kappa values between 0.60 and 0.79; and for congestive heart failure, obesity, prior myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease, bleeding complications, history of venous thromboembolism, prosthetic-related complications, and postoperative renal failure by kappa values between 0.40 and 0.59. All comorbidities and complications had a high degree of specificity (> 92%) but lower sensitivity (29%–100%).

Conclusions

The data suggest administratively coded comorbidities and complications correlate reasonably well with the clinical record. However, the specificity of administrative claims is much higher than the sensitivity, indicating that comorbidities and complications coded in the administrative record were accurate but often incomplete.

Level of Evidence

Level II, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

References

  1. 1.
    Bozic KJ, Lau E, Kurtz S, Ong K, Berry DJ. Patient-related risk factors for postoperative mortality and periprosthetic joint infection in Medicare patients undergoing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:130–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bozic KJ, Lau E, Kurtz S, Ong K, Berry DJ. Patient-related risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection and postoperative mortality following total hip arthroplasty in Medicare patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.00072 [Epub ahead of print].
  3. 3.
    Daneshvar P, Forster AJ, Dervin GF. Accuracy of administrative coding in identifying hip and knee primary replacements and revisions. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011; doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01622.x [Epub ahead of print].
  4. 4.
    Fox KM, Reuland M, Hawkes WG, Hebel JR, Hudson J, Zimmerman SI, Kenzora J, Magaziner J. Accuracy of medical records in hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:745–750.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Furlan JC, Fehlings MG. The National Trauma Registry as a Canadian spine trauma database: a validation study using an institutional clinical database. Neuroepidemiology. 2011;37:96–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J, Mowat F, Saleh K, Dybvik E, Karrholm J, Garellick G, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Malchau H, Lau E. Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(Suppl 3):144–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lai K, Bohm ER, Burnell C, Hedden DR. Presence of medical comorbidities in patients with infected primary hip or knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:651–656.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mears SC, Bawa M, Pietryak P, Jones LC, Rajadhyaksha AD, Hungerford DS, Mont MA. Coding of diagnoses, comorbidities, and complications of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;402:164–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Romano PS, Roos LL, Luft HS, Jollis JG, Doliszny K. A comparison of administrative versus clinical data: coronary artery bypass surgery as an example. Ischemic Heart Disease Patient Outcomes Research Team. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:249–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Romano PS, Schembri ME, Rainwater JA. Can administrative data be used to ascertain clinically significant postoperative complications? Am J Med Qual. 2002;17:145–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stickler DE, Royer JA, Hardin JW. Accuracy and usefulness of ICD-10 death certificate coding for the identification of patients with ALS: results from the South Carolina ALS Surveillance Pilot Project. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2012;13:69–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin J. Bozic
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ravi K. Bashyal
    • 4
  • Shawn G. Anthony
    • 3
  • Vanessa Chiu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Brandon Shulman
    • 5
  • Harry E. Rubash
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy StudiesUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNorthShore University HealthSystemEvanstonUSA
  5. 5.Perlman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations