Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures: Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
- 1.4k Downloads
Most patients with displaced femoral neck fractures are treated by THA and hemiarthroplasty, but it remains uncertain which if either is associated with better function and lower risks of complications.
We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine whether THA was associated with lower rates of reoperations, mortality, complications, and better function compared with hemiarthroplasty.
We searched the PubMed, Embase, Chinese Biomedicine Literature, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials databases and identified 12 RCTs (including a total of 1320 patients) for meta-analysis. Risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) from each trial were pooled using random-effects or fixed-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies.
THA was associated with a lower risk of subsequent reoperations compared with hemiarthroplasty (RR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34–0.84). There was no difference in mortality between patients undergoing THA and hemiarthroplasty (RR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.60–1.09). For complications, there was a higher risk of dislocation in patients undergoing THA (RR = 1.99; 95% CI, 1.26–3.15), but there were no differences in local infections (RR = 1.60; 95% CI, 0.74–3.46) and general complications (RR = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.91–1.45). Patients with THA had higher Harris hip scores at 1 year (WMD = 3.81; 95% CI, 0.87–6.74) and at 3 or 4 years (WMD = 10.07; 95% CI, 6.92–13.21).
Despite more dislocations, THA can benefit patients with displaced femoral neck fractures with a lower reoperation rate and higher functional scores.
KeywordsGeneral Complication Displace Femoral Neck Fracture Eligible RCTs Lower Reoperation Rate Sequential Omission
We thank Zhang Guoqiang MD, Department of Orthopedics, Chinese General Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, for valuable statistic advice concerning this study.
- 2.Avery PP, Baker RP, Walton MJ, Rooker JC, Squires B, Gargan MF, Bannister GC. Total hip replacement and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck: a seven- to ten-year follow-up report of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1045–1048.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Blomfeldt R, Törnkvist H, Eriksson K, Söderqvist A, Ponzer S, Tidermark J. A randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:160–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Butler M, Forte M, Kane RL, Joglekar S, Duval SJ, Swiontkowski M, Wilt T. Treatment of common hip fractures. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009;184:1–85, v.Google Scholar
- 9.Deng R, Zhu J, Hong L, Cui H, Huang Z. [Total hip replacement and femoral head replacement in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients] [in Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine. 2009;32(suppl):81–83.Google Scholar
- 13.Enocson A, Hedbeck CJ, Törnkvist H, Tidermark J, Lapidus LJ. Unipolar versus bipolar Exeter hip hemiarthroplasty: a prospective cohort study on 830 consecutive hips in patients with femoral neck fractures. Int Orthop. 2011 July 26. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
- 16.Hedbeck CJ, Enocson A, Lapidus G, Blomfeldt R, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S, Tidermark J. Comparison of bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a concise four-year follow-up of a randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:445–450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA; Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Keating JF, Grant A, Masson M, Scott NW, Forbes JF. Displaced intracapsular hip fractures in fit, older people: a randomised comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9:iii–iv, ix–x, 1–65.Google Scholar
- 24.Lai M. [Hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients] [in Chinese]. Chinese Journal of New Clinical Medicine. 2010;3:41–44.Google Scholar
- 25.Li L, Nie Z, Niu J. [Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients] [in Chinese]. China Foreign Medical Treatment. 2011;19:52–55.Google Scholar
- 27.Macaulay W, Nellans KW, Garvin KL, Iorio R, Healy WL, Rosenwasser MP; other members of the DFACTO Consortium. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: winner of the Dorr Award. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(6 suppl 1):2–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Pang H. [Total hip arthroplasty and bipolar hemiarthroplasty for treatment of femoral neck fractures] [in Chinese]. China Prac Med. 2011;6:81–83.Google Scholar
- 35.Parker MJ, Gurusamy KS, Azegami S. Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;6:CD001706.Google Scholar
- 41.van den Bekerom MP, Hilverdink EF, Sierevelt IN, Reuling EM, Schnater JM, Bonke H, Goslings JC, van Dijk CN, Raaymakers EL. A comparison of hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck: a randomised controlled multicentre trial in patients aged 70 years and over. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:1422–1428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar