Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 470, Issue 10, pp 2690–2694 | Cite as

Operating Room Traffic is a Major Concern During Total Joint Arthroplasty

  • Pedram Panahi
  • Mitchell Stroh
  • David S. Casper
  • Javad Parvizi
  • Matthew S. Austin
Symposium: 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society

Abstract

Background

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a challenging complication associated with total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Traffic in the operating room (OR) increases bacterial counts in the OR, and may lead to increased rates of infection.

Question/purposes

Our purposes were to (1) define the incidence of door opening during primary and revision TJA, providing a comparison between the two types of procedures, and (2) identify the causes of door opening in order to develop a strategy to reduce traffic in the operating room.

Methods

An observer collected data during 80 primary and 36 revision TJAs. Surgeries were performed under vertical, laminar flow. Operating room personnel were unaware of the observer, thus removing bias from traffic. The observer documented the number, reason, and personnel involved in the event of a door opening from time of tray opening to closure of the surgical site.

Results

The average operating time for primary and revision procedures was 92 and 161 minutes, respectively. Average door openings were 60 in primary cases and 135 in revisions, yielding per minute rates of 0.65 and 0.84, respectively. The circulating nurse and surgical implant representatives constituted the majority of OR traffic.

Conclusions

Traffic in the OR is a major concern during TJA. Revision cases demonstrated a particularly high rate of traffic. Implementation of strategies, such as storage of instruments and components in the operating room and education of OR personnel, is required to reduce door openings in the OR.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ranna Jaraha for her help with data collection.

References

  1. 1.
    Bozic KJ, Ries MD. The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1746–1751.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cataldo MA, Petrosillo N, Cipriani M, Cauda R, Tacconelli E. Prosthetic joint infection: recent developments in diagnosis and management. J Infect. 2010;61:443–448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dowsey MM, Choong PFM. Obesity is a major risk factor for prosthetic infection after primary hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:153–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Evans RP. Current concepts for clean air and total joint arthroplasty: laminar airflow and ultraviolet radiation: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:945–953.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hanssen AD. Prophylactic use of antibiotic bone cement: an emerging standard in opposition. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(Suppl. 1):73–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson AJ, Daley JA, Zywiel MG, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Preoperative chlorhexidine preparation and the incidence of surgical site infections after hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(Suppl. 6):98–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaltsas DS. Infection after total hip arthroplasty. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2004;86:267–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katthagen BD, Zamani P, Jung W. [Effect of surgical draping on bacterial contamination in the surgical field] [In German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1992;130:230–235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lynch RJ, Englesbe MJ, Sturm L, Bitar A, Budhiraj K, Kolla S, Polyachenko Y, Duck MG, Campbell DA Jr. Measurement of foot traffic in the operating room: implications for infection control. Am J Med Qual. 2009;24:45–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ong KL, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Bozic KJ, Berry DJ, Parvizi J. Prosthetic joint infection risk after total hip arthroplasty in the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(Suppl. 6):105–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parikh SN, Grice SS, Schnell BM, Salisbury SR. Operating room traffic: is there any role of monitoring it? J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30:617–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, Peterson M. Infection in total knee replacement: a retrospective review of 6489 total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:15–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pryor F, Messmer PR. The effect of traffic patterns in the OR on surgical site infections. AORN J. 1998;68:649–660.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1710–1715.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sendi P, Zumstein MA, Zimmerli W. [Periprosthetic joint infections - a review for general practitioners] [In German]. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2011;100:787–792.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tjade OH, Gabor I. Evaluation of airborne operating room bacteria with a Biap slit sampler. J Hyg (Lond). 1980;84:37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Young RS, O’Regan DJ. Cardiac surgical theatre traffic: time for traffic calming measures? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10:526–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedram Panahi
    • 1
  • Mitchell Stroh
    • 1
  • David S. Casper
    • 1
  • Javad Parvizi
    • 1
  • Matthew S. Austin
    • 1
  1. 1.The Rothman Institute of OrthopaedicsThomas Jefferson University HospitalPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations