Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 470, Issue 7, pp 1980–1986 | Cite as

High Revision and Reoperation Rates Using the AgilityTM Total Ankle System

  • Braden J. Criswell
  • Keith Douglas
  • Rishi Naik
  • A. Brian Thomson
Clinical Research

Abstract

Background

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an evolving treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis, however, there is controversy regarding its longevity.

Questions/purposes

We determined survival of the Agility™ TAA, the overall reoperation rate, and function in patients who retained their implant.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 64 patients who had 65 TAAs between June 1999 and May 2001. Information was gathered through chart reviews, mailed-in questionnaires, and telephone interviews. Nine patients had died; data were available for 41 of the remaining 55 patients. Survival was based on revision as an end point. The minimum followup was 0.5 years (median, 8 years; range, 0.5–11 years).

Results

Sixteen of the 41 patients (39%) needed revisions. The average time to revision surgery was 4 years with six of the revisions (38%) occurring within 1 year of the TAA. Of the 25 patients who retained their implants, 12 required secondary surgery for an overall reoperation rate of 28 of 41 (68%) at an average of 8 years followup. The average VAS pain score was 4, the average Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) sports subscale score was 33, and the average FAAM activities of daily living subscale score was 57.

Conclusion

TAA had high revision and reoperation rates. Patients who retained their implant had only moderate pain relief and function. TAA must be approached with caution. More research is needed to elucidate the role of contemporary TAA.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

References

  1. 1.
    Baños JE, Bosch F, Cañellas M, Bassols A, Ortega F, Bigorra J. Acceptability of visual analogue scales in the clinical setting: a comparison with verbal rating scales in postoperative pain. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1989;11;123–127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buckwalter JA, Saltzman C, Brown T. The impact of osteoarthritis: implications for research. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;427(suppl):S6–S15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. Survivorship and clinical evaluation of cementless, meniscal-bearing total ankle replacements. Semin Arthroplasty. 1992;3:43–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dini AA, Bassett FH 3rd. Evaluation of the early result of Smith total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;146:228–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doets HC, Brand R, Nelissen RG. Total ankle arthroplasty in inflammatory joint disease with use of two mobile-bearing designs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1272–1284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Helm R, Stevens J. Long-term results of total ankle replacement. J Arthroplasty. 1986;1:271–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jager KJ, van Dijk PC, Zoccali C, Dekker FW. The analysis of survival data: the Kaplan-Meier method. Kidney Int. 2008;74:560–565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karantana A, Hobson S, Dhar S. The Scandinavian total ankle replacement: survivorship at 5 and 8 years comparable to other series. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:951–957.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL. Clinical results of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1658–1664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knecht SI, Estin M, Callaghan JJ, Zimmerman MB, Alliman KJ, Alvine FG, Saltzman CL. The Agility total ankle arthroplasty: seven to sixteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1161–1171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kofoed H, Sorensen TS. Ankle arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: prospective long-term study of cemented replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:328–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lachiewicz PF, Inglis AE, Ranawat CS. Total ankle replacement in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:340–343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lynch AF, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH. The long-term results of ankle arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:113–116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:968–983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Newton SE 3rd. Total ankle arthroplasty: clinical study of fifty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:104–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pyevich MT, Saltzman CL, Callaghan JJ, Alvine FG. Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to twelve-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1410–1420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saltzman CL, Mann RA, Ahrens JE, Amendola A, Anderson RB, Berlet GC, Brodsky JW, Chou LB, Clanton TO, Deland JT, Deorio JK, Horton GA, Lee TH, Mann JA, Nunley JA, Thordarson DB, Walling AK, Wapner KL, Coughlin MJ. Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:579–596.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    SooHoo NF, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Comparison of reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2143–2149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spirt AA, Assal M, Hansen ST Jr. Complications and failure after total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1172–1178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stauffer RN, Segal NM. Total ankle arthroplasty: four years’ experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;160:217–221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Su EP, Kahn B, Figgie MP. Total ankle replacement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:32–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Sugimoto K, Akiyama K, Tamai S. Long-term results of arthrodesis for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;361:178–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van den Heuvel A, Van Bouwel SV, Dereymaeker G. Total ankle replacement: design evolution and results. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76:150–161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van der Heide HJ, Schutte B, Louwerens JW, van den Hoogen FH, Malefijt MC. Total ankle prostheses in rheumatoid arthropathy: outcome in 52 patients followed for 1-9 years. Acta Orthop. 2009;80:440–444.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Braden J. Criswell
    • 1
  • Keith Douglas
    • 1
  • Rishi Naik
    • 1
  • A. Brian Thomson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedics and RehabilitationVanderbilt Orthopedic InstituteNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations