Using Financial Incentives to Improve Value in Orthopaedics
- 551 Downloads
A variety of reforms to traditional approaches to provider payment and benefit design are being implemented in the United States. There is increasing interest in applying these financial incentives to orthopaedics, although it is unclear whether and to what extent they have been implemented and whether they increase quality or reduce costs.
We reviewed and discussed physician- and patient-oriented financial incentives being implemented in orthopaedics, key challenges, and prerequisites to payment reform and value-driven payment policy in orthopaedics.
We searched the MEDLINE database using as search terms various provider payment and consumer incentive models. We retrieved a total of 169 articles; none of these studies met the inclusion criteria. For incentive models known to the authors to be in use in orthopaedics but for which no peer-reviewed literature was found, we searched Google for further information.
Provider financial incentives reviewed include payments for reporting, performance, and patient safety and episode payment. Patient incentives include tiered networks, value-based benefit design, reference pricing, and value-based purchasing. Reform of financial incentives for orthopaedic surgery is challenged by (1) lack of a payment/incentive model that has demonstrated reductions in cost trends and (2) the complex interrelation of current pay schemes in today’s fragmented environment. Prerequisites to reform include (1) a reliable and complete data infrastructure; (2) new business structures to support cost sharing; and (3) a retooling of patient expectations.
There is insufficient literature reporting the effects of various financial incentive models under implementation in orthopaedics to know whether they increase quality or reduce costs. National concerns about cost will continue to drive experimentation, and all anticipated innovations will require improved collaboration and data collection and reporting.
KeywordsFinancial Incentive Cost Sharing Reference Price Comparative Effectiveness Research Payment Model
The authors thank Vanessa Chiu for her assistance in preparing and editing this article.
- 1.Aetna Inc. Aexcel® Specialist Designation in Aetna Performance Network Methodology Guide. Available at: http://www.aetna.com/plansandproducts/health/medical/Aexcel_Methodology_v3_2010.pdf. Accessed January 2011.
- 2.American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Orthopaedic practice in the U.S. 2008. 2009. Available at: http://www3.aaos.org/product/productpage.cfm?code=05151. Accessed September 6, 2011.
- 3.American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). 2010. Available at: http://www.aaos.org/research/committee/evidence/pqri_measures.asp. Accessed February 21, 2011.
- 7.Boxall A. Should we expand the use of pay-for-performance in health care? 2009. Available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/Library/pubs/rp/2009-10/10rp12.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2011.
- 10.CalPERS. 2011 premium comparison. 2011. Available at: http://www.calpers.ca.gov/eip-docs/about/board-cal-agenda/agendas/hbc/201006/item-3a-attach-1.pdf. Accessed January 2011.
- 11.Casale A, Michalak DM. ProvenCare CAB. 2010. Available at: http://www.geisinger.org/info/innov_conf/careDeliveryConf/august2010_conf_presentations/pcacute.pdf. Accessed January 2011.
- 13.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation. Partnership for Patients. 2011. Available at: http://innovations.cms.gov/areas-of-focus/patient-care-models/partnerships-for-patients/. Accessed August 4, 2011.
- 14.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Hospital-acquired conditions (present on admission indicator). 2008. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/HospitalAcqCond/06_Hospital-Acquired_Conditions.asp#TopOfPage. Accessed July 2011.
- 15.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Decision memo for surgery on the wrong patient. 2009. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo.aspx?NCAId=221&ver=17&NcaName=Surgery+on+the+Wrong+Patient&bc=BEAAAAAAEAAA&&fromdb=true. Accessed July 2011.
- 16.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Medicare demonstrations illustrate benefits in paying for quality health care. 2010. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/apps/media/press/release.asp?Counter=3882&intNumPerPage=10&checkDate=&checkKey=&srchType=1&numDays=3500&srchOpt=0&srchData=&keywordType=All&chkNewsType=1%2C+2%2C+3%2C+4%2C+5&intPage=&showAll=&pYear=&year=&desc=&cboOrder=date. Accessed January 8, 2011.
- 17.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). 2011 Physician Quality Reporting System (Physician Quality Reporting) Measures List. 2010. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/PQRS/Downloads/2011_PhysQualRptg_MeasuresList_033111.pdf. Accessed July 13, 2011.
- 20.CJRR Steering Committee. The California Joint Replacement Registry: selecting a tool for evaluating patient reported outcomes (draft) 2010. Available at: http://www.caljrr.org/pdf/PatientReportedOutcomesBrief.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2011.
- 21.Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Massachusetts Division of Health Care Finance and Policy. Recommendations of the Special Commission on the Health Care Payment System. 2009. Available at: http://www.mass.gov/dhcfp/paymentcommission. Accessed February 15, 2011.
- 22.Consumer-Purchaser Disclosure Project. Patient charter for physician performance measurement, reporting and tiering program: ensuring transparency, fairness and independent review. 2008. Available at: http://healthcaredisclosure.org/docs/files/PatientCharter.pdf. Accessed January 2011.
- 24.Darr K. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services proposal to pay for performance. Hosp Top. 2003;81:30–32.Google Scholar
- 26.Department of Health and Human Services. Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Value-Based Purchasing Program. 2011. Available at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-01-13/pdf/2011-454.pdf. Accessed February 23, 2011.
- 27.Dudley RA, Rosenthal MB. Pay for performance: a decision guide for purchasers (final contract report) 2006. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/p4pguide.pdf. Accessed January 15, 2011.
- 37.Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute. Prometheus in practice. 2010. Available at: http://www.prometheuspayment.org/Documents/Prometheus-Karen-Insert-L4.pdf. Accessed January 2011.
- 42.Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. The Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine. Learning healthcare system concepts v. 2008. Annual report. 2008. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/Quality/VSRT/Learning%20Healthcare%20System%20Concepts%20v2008.pdf. Accessed September 6, 2011.
- 43.Integrated Healthcare Association (IHA). Value-based purchasing of medical devices. 2010. Available at: http://www.iha.org/medical_device_vbp.html. Accessed January 2011.
- 44.Integrated Healthcare Association (IHA). IHA Bundled Episode Payment and Gainsharing Demonstration: Project Description March 14, 2011. 2011. Available at: http://www.iha.org/pdfs_documents/BundledEpisodePaymentPilotProjectDescription_March2011.pdf. Accessed August 4, 2011.
- 50.Medicare. Physician Compare Web site. 2011. Available at: http://www.medicare.gov/find-a-doctor/provider-search.aspx. Accessed July 2011.
- 53.Premier Healthcare Alliance. Hospitals in demonstration project continue to improve patient outcomes, provide lessons learned for health reform value-based purchasing program. 2010. Available at: http://www.premierinc.com/about/news/10-dec/hqid121710.jsp. Accessed July 12, 2011.
- 59.US Congress. Section 3001, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. HR 3590. 2010. Available at: http://democrats.senate.gov/reform/patient-protection-affordable-care-act-as-passed.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2011.
- 61.Willensky GR. Health economics. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;153:179–193.Google Scholar