Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 470, Issue 4, pp 1079–1089 | Cite as

Is Hip Arthroscopy Cost-effective for Femoroacetabular Impingement?

  • David W. Shearer
  • Jonathan Kramer
  • Kevin J. Bozic
  • Brian T. FeeleyEmail author
Symposium: Value Based Healthcare



The impact of hip arthroscopy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among younger patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is unknown, but with increasing recognition of the condition there is likely to be increasing demand for arthroscopy.


We describe an approach to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of hip arthroscopy compared with observation in patients with FAI; we also identified variables that influence its cost-effectiveness.

Patients and Methods

We constructed a Markov model including possible health states for 36-year-old patients with FAI using decision analysis software and compared two strategies: (1) observation and (2) hip arthroscopy, followed by THA with disease progression. We estimated the ratio of the incremental cost to the incremental benefit (reflected by HRQoL) of both strategies. We identified studies reporting Harris hip scores and complications after arthroscopy to estimate health state preferences and their probabilities. We performed sensitivity analyses on 30 input variables over a plausible range of estimates to determine the influence of uncertainty on the ICER with particular emphasis on the magnitude and duration of benefit.


Among patients with FAI but no radiographic evidence of arthritis, the estimated ICER of hip arthroscopy was $21,700/QALY while the ICER for patients with preoperative arthritis was $79,500/QALY. Alteration of the natural history of arthritis by hip arthroscopy improved the ICER to $19,200/QALY and resulted in cost savings if THA was not performed until at least 16 years after arthroscopy.


Although limited by available data, our model suggests hip arthroscopy in patients with FAI without arthritis may result in a favorable ICER compared with other health interventions considered cost-effective. Further studies of hip arthroscopy are needed to determine the impact on quality of life, duration of symptomatic relief, and the effect on the need for subsequent THA.


Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Femoroacetabular Impingement Annual Failure Rate Discrete Health State Postoperative Utility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We thank Eula McKinney and Skye Ramos for their assistance in preparing the manuscript.


  1. 1.
    Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. HCUPnet: A tool for identifying, tracking, and analyzing national hospital statistics. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Available at: Accessed December 23, 2010.
  2. 2.
    Australian Orthopaedic Association. National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA; 2009.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bardakos NV, Vasconcelos JC, Villar RN. Early outcome of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: the role of femoral osteoplasty in symptomatic improvement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1570–1575.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bardakos NV, Villar RN. Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement: a radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:162–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bozic KJ, Ries MD. The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1746–1751.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Byrd JW, Jones KS. Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:578–587.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Byrd JW, Jones KS. Arthroscopic femoroplasty in the management of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:739–746.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Byrd JW, Jones KS. Hip arthroscopy for labral pathology: prospective analysis with 10-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:365–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Byrd JW, Jones KS. Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:741–746.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Byrd JWT. Operative Hip Arthroscopy. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005:xvi.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chang RW, Pellisier JM, Hazen GB. A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip. JAMA. 1996;275:858–865.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cummins JS, Tomek IM, Kantor SR, Furnes O, Engesaeter LB, Finlayson SR. Cost-effectiveness of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement used in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:634–641.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ethgen O, Bruyère O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:963–974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farjo LA, Glick JM, Sampson TG. Hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears. Arthroscopy. 1999;15:132–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garellick G, Karrholm J, Rogmark C, Herberts P. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: Annual Report. Goteborg: Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics; 2008.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gold M. Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Med Care. 1996;34(Suppl):DS197–199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737–755.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haviv B, Singh PJ, Takla A, O’Donnell J. Arthroscopic femoral osteochondroplasty for cam lesions with isolated acetabular chondral damage. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:629–633.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hunink M. Decision Making in Health and Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ilizaliturri VM Jr. Complications of arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement treatment: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:760–768.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ilizaliturri VM Jr, Orozco-Rodriguez L, Acosta-Rodríguez E, Camacho-Galindo J. Arthroscopic treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement: preliminary report at 2 years minimum follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:226–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kamath AF, Componovo R, Baldwin K, Israelite CL, Nelson CL. Hip arthroscopy for labral tears: review of clinical outcomes with 4.8-year mean follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1721–1727.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Larson CM, Giveans MR. Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: early outcomes measures. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:540–546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Larson CM, Giveans MR. Arthroscopic débridement versus refixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:369–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lincoln M, Johnston K, Muldoon M, Santore R. Combined arthroscopic and modified open approach for cam femoroacetabular impingement: a preliminary experience. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:392–399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Yen YM, Kuppersmith DA. Outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with associated chondrolabral dysfunction: minimum two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:16–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Philippon MJ, Schenker ML, Briggs KK, Maxwell RB. Can microfracture produce repair tissue in acetabular chondral defects? Arthroscopy. 2008;24:46–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Philippon MJ, Weiss DR, Kuppersmith DA, Briggs KK, Hay CJ. Arthroscopic labral repair and treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in professional hockey players. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:99–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Potter BK, Freedman BA, Andersen RC, Bojescul JA, Kuklo TR, Murphy KP. Correlation of Short Form-36 and disability status with outcomes of arthroscopic acetabular labral débridement. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:864–870.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Robertson WJ, Kadrmas WR, Kelly BT. Arthroscopic management of labral tears in the hip: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;455:88–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sampson TG. Complications of hip arthroscopy. Clin Sports Med. 2001;20:831–835.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sampson TG. Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2005;20:56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Santori N, Villar RN. Acetabular labral tears: result of arthroscopic partial limbectomy. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:11–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sharifi E, Sharifi H, Morshed S, Bozic K, Diab M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1447–1456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Siegel JE, Weinstein MC, Russell LB, Gold MR. Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA. 1996;276:1339–1341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Singh PJ, O’Donnell JM. The outcome of hip arthroscopy in Australian football league players: a review of 27 hips. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:743–749.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Steiner C, Elixhauser A, Schnaier J. The healthcare cost and utilization project: an overview. Eff Clin Pract. 2002;5:143–151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB. Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA. 1996;276:1253–1258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhan C, Kaczmarek R, Loyo-Berrios N, Sangl J, Bright RA Incidence and short-term outcomes of primary and revision hip replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:526–533.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zumstein M, Hahn F, Sukthankar A, Sussmann PS, Dora C. How accurately can the acetabular rim be trimmed in hip arthroscopy for pincer-type femoral acetabular impingement: a cadaveric investigation. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:164–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • David W. Shearer
    • 1
  • Jonathan Kramer
    • 1
  • Kevin J. Bozic
    • 1
  • Brian T. Feeley
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations