Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 469, Issue 7, pp 1829–1837 | Cite as

Patient Gender Affects the Referral and Recommendation for Total Joint Arthroplasty

  • Cornelia M. Borkhoff
  • Gillian A. Hawker
  • James G. Wright
Symposium: AAOS/ORS/ABJS Musculoskeletal Healthcare Disparities Research Symposium



Rates of use of total joint arthroplasty among appropriate and willing candidates are lower in women than in men. A number of factors may explain this gender disparity, including patients’ preferences for surgery, gender bias influencing physicians’ clinical decision-making, and the patient-physician interaction.


We propose a framework of how patient gender affects the patient and physician decision-making process of referral and recommendation for total joint arthroplasty and consider potential interventions to close the gender gap in total joint arthroplasty utilization.


The process involved in the referral and recommendation for total joint arthroplasty involves eight discrete steps. A systematic review is used to describe the influence of patient gender and related clinical and nonclinical factors at each step.

Where are we now?

Patient gender plays an important role in the process of referral and recommendation for total joint arthroplasty. Female gender primarily affects Steps 3 through 8, suggesting barriers unique to women exist in the patient-physician interaction.

Where do we need to go?

Developing and evaluating interventions that improve the quality of the patient-physician interaction should be the focus of future research.

How do we get there?

Potential interventions include using decision support tools that facilitate shared decision-making between patients and their physicians and promoting cultural competency and shared decision-making skills programs as a core component of medical education. Increasing physicians’ acceptance and awareness of the unconscious biases that may be influencing their clinical decision-making may require additional skills programs.


  1. 1.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services. 2004 National Healthcare Disparities Report. December 2004. AHRQ Publication Number 05-0014. Available at: Accessed November 29, 2010.
  2. 2.
    Beach MC, Gary TL, Robinson KA, Gozu A, Palacio A, Smarth C, Jenckes MW, Feuerstein C, Bass EB, Powe NR, Cooper LA. Cultural competence: a systematic review of health care provider educational interventions. Med Care. 2005;43:356–373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beach MC, Rosner M, Cooper LA, Duggan PS, Shatzer J. Can patient-centered attitudes reduce racial and ethnic disparities in care? Acad Med. 2007;82:193–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bertakis KD, Azari R, Helms LJ, Callahan EJ, Robbins JA. Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:147–152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Birdwell BG, Herbers JE, Kroenke K. Evaluating chest pain: the patient’s presentation style alters the physician’s diagnostic approach. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:1991–1995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borkhoff CM, Hawker GA, Kreder HJ, Glazier RH, Mohamed NN, Wright JG. The effect of patients’ sex on physicians’ recommendations for total knee arthroplasty. CMAJ. 2008;178:681–687.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borkhoff CM, Hawker GA, Kreder HJ, Glazier RH, Mohamed NN, Wright JG. The influence of patients’ gender on physicians’ interpersonal behaviour regarding total knee arthroplasty: what if your physician doesn’t ask you to dance? Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16(Suppl 4):S140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borkhoff CM, Wieland ML, Myasoedova E, Ahmad Z, Welch V, Hawker GA, Li LC, Buchbinder R, Ueffing E, Beaton D, Cardiel MH, Gabriel SE, Guillemin F, Adebajo AO, Bombardier C, Hajjaj-Hassouni N, Tugwell P. Reaching those most in need: a scoping review of interventions to improve health care quality for disadvantaged populations with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63:39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bourne RB, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Mokete L, Guerin L. Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5 to 11 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:27–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Braddock CH, Edwards KA, Hasenber NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282:2313–2320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buchbinder R. Self-management education en masse: effectiveness of the Back Pain: Don’t Take It Lying Down mass media campaign. Med J Aust. 2008;189:S29–S32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carrillo JE, Green AR, Betancourt JR. Cross-cultural primary care: a patient-based approach. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:829–834.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chang HJ, Mehta PS, Rosenberg A, Scrimshaw SC. Concerns of patients actively contemplating total knee replacement: differences by race and gender. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:117–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681–692.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clark JP, Hudak PL, Hawker GA, Coyte PC, Mahomed NN, Kreder HJ, Wright JG. The moving target: a qualitative study of elderly patients’ decision-making regarding total joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1366–1374.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Coyte PC, Hawker GA, Croxford R, Attard C, Wright JG. Variation in rheumatologists’ and family physicians’ perceptions of the indications for and outcomes of knee replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 1996;23:730–738.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coyte PC, Hawker GA, Croxford R, Wright JG. Rates of revision knee replacement in Ontario, Canada. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:773–782.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Devine PG. Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;56:5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Einbinder LC, Schulman KA. The effect of race on the referral process for invasive cardiac procedures. Med Care Res Rev. 2000;57(Suppl 1):162–180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Elderkin-Thompson V, Waitzkin H. Differences in clinical communication by gender. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:112–121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L, Liang MH, Tanzer M, Ferland D, Phillips C, Partridge AJ, Belisle P, Fossel AH, Mahomed NN, Sledge CB, Katz JN. Outcomes of total hip replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:1722–1728.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fowler RA, Sabur N, Li P, Juurlink DN, Pinto R, Hladunewich MA, Adhikari NK, Sibbald WJ, Martin CM. Sex- and age-based differences in the delivery and outcomes of critical care. CMAJ. 2007;177:1513–1519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Franks P, Clancy CM. Referrals of adult patients from primary care: demographic disparities and their relationship to HMO insurance. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:47–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gandhi R, Razak F, Davey JR, Rampersaud YR, Mahomed NN. Effect of sex and living arrangement on the timing and outcome of joint replacement surgery. Can J Surg. 2010;53:37–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Giacomini MK. Gender and ethnic differences in hospital-based procedure utilization in California. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1217–1224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Glazier RH, Dalby DM, Badley EM, Hawker GA, Bell MJ, Buchbinder R, Lineker SC. Management of common musculoskeletal problems: a survey of Ontario primary care physicians. CMAJ. 1998;158:1037–1040.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hall JA, Roter DL, Katz NR. Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med Care. 1988;26:657–675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hawker GA. Who, when, and why total joint replacement surgery? The patient’s perspective. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2006;18:526–530.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hawker GA, Guan J, Croxford R, Coyte PC, Glazier RH, Harvey BJ, Wright JG, Williams JI, Badley EM. A prospective population-based study of the predictors of undergoing total joint arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:3212–3220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hawker GA, Wright JG, Badley EM, Coyte PC. Perceptions of, and willingness to consider, total joint arthroplasty in a population-based cohort of individuals with disabling hip and knee arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:635–641.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Paul J, Dittus R, Croxford R, Katz B, Bombardier C, Heck D, Freund D. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement surgery: results of the knee replacement patient outcomes research team study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:163–173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Williams JI, Harvey B, Glazier R, Badley EM. Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1016–1022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Williams JI, Harvey B, Glazier R, Wilkins A, Badley EM. Determining the need for hip and knee arthroplasty: the role of clinical severity and patients’ preferences. Med Care. 2001;39:206–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Heck DA, Melfi CA, Mamlin LA, Katz BP, Arthur DS, Dittus RS, Freund DA. Revision rates after knee replacement in the United States. Med Care. 1998;36:661–669.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Holtzman J, Saleh K, Kane R. Gender differences in functional status and pain in a Medicare population undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. Med Care. 2002;40:461–470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hudak PL, Clark JP, Hawker GA, Coyte PC, Mahomed NN, Kreder HJ, Wright JG. “You’re perfect for the procedure! Why don’t you want it?” Elderly arthritis patients’ unwillingness to consider total joint arthroplasty surgery: a qualitative study. Med Decis Making. 2002;22:272–278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hudak PL, Grassau P, Glazier RH, Hawker G, Kreder H, Coyte P, Mahomed N, Wright JG. “Not everyone who needs one is going to get one”: the influence of medical brokering on patient candidacy for total joint arthroplasty. Med Decis Making. 2008;28:773–780.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hughes D, Griffiths L. “Ruling in” and “ruling out”: two approaches to the micro-rationing of health care. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:589–599.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Juni P, Low N, Reichenbach S, Villiger PM, Williams S, Dieppe PA. Gender inequity in the provision of care for hip disease: population-based cross-sectional study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18:640–645.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kaplan SH, Gandek B, Greenfield S, Rogers W, Ware JE. Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians’ participatory decision-making style: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care. 1995;33:1176–1187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Karlson EW, Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Eaton HE, Katz JN. Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery. Am J Med. 1997;102:524–530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Katz BP, Freund DA, Heck DA, Dittus RS, Paul JE, Wright JG, Coyte P, Holleman E, Hawker GA. Demographic variation in the rate of knee replacement: a multi-year analysis. Health Serv Res. 1996;31:125–140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Katz JN. Patient preferences and health disparities. JAMA. 2001;286:1506–1509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Katz JN, Wright EA, Guadagnoli E, Liang MH, Karlson EW, Cleary PD. Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopaedic surgery for degenerative arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37:687–694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Levinson W, Hudak PL, Feldman JJ, Frankel RM, Kuby A, Bereknyei S, Braddock CH. “It’s not what you say…”: racial disparities in communication between orthopaedic surgeons and patients. Med Care. 2008:46:410–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making: a national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:531–535.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lewis MI. An economic profile of American older women. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1997;52:107–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    MacDonald SJ, Charron KD, Bourne RB, Naudie DD, McCalden RW, Rorabeck CH. The John Insall Award. Gender-specific total knee replacement: prospectively collected clinical outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2612–2616.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:1273–1279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Monteith MJ. Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: implications for progress in prejudice reduction efforts. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;65:469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    NIH Consensus Panel. NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement December 8–10, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1328–1335.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care Wait Times Health Initiative. Available at: Accessed November 29, 2010.
  54. 54.
    Parsley BS, Bertolusso R, Harrington M, Brekke A, Noble PC. Influence of gender on age of treatment with TKA and functional outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1759–1764.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Reynolds DL, Chambers LW, Badley EM, Bennett KJ, Goldsmith CH, Jamieson E, Torrance GW, Tugwell P. Physical disability among Canadians reporting musculoskeletal diseases. J Rheumatol. 1992;19:1020–1030.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ritter MA, Wing JT, Berend ME, Davis KE, Meding JB. The clinical effect of gender on outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:331–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ross S, Moffat K, McConnachie A, Gordon J, Wilson P. Sex and attitude: a randomized vignette study of the management of depression by general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49:17–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Roter D, Lipkin M Jr, Korsgaard A. Sex differences in patients’ and physicians’ communication during primary care medical visits. Med Care. 1991;29:1083–1093.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sale JE, Gignac M, Hawker GA. The relationship between disease symptoms, life events, coping and treatment, and depression among older adults with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:335–342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Santaguida PL, Hawker GA, Hudak PL, Glazier R, Mahomed NN, Kreder HJ, Coyte PC, Wright JG. Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Can J Surg. 2008;51:428–436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Schulman KA, Berlin JA, Harless W, Kerner JF, Sistrunk S, Gersh BJ, Dubé R, Taleghani CK, Burke JE, Williams S, Eisenberg JM, Escarce JJ. The effect of race and sex on physicians’ recommendations for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:618–626.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Seils DM, Friedman JY, Schulman KA. Sex differences in the referral process for invasive cardiac procedures. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2001;56:151–154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Soohoo NF, Farng E, Lieberman JR, Chambers L, Zingmond DS. Factors that predict short-term complication rates after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2363–2371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Stacey D, Hawker GA, Dervin G, Tomek I, Cochran N, Tugwell P, O’Connor A. Improving shared decision making in osteoarthritis. BMJ. 2008;336:954–955.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Suarez-Almazor ME. Unraveling gender and ethnic variation in the utilization of elective procedures: the case of total joint replacement. Med Care. 2002;40:447–450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Toye FM, Barlow J, Wright C, Lamb SE. Personal meanings in the construction of need for total knee replacement surgery. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63:43–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Unruh AM. Gender variations in clinical pain experience. Pain. 1996;65:123–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wodak R. Women relate, men report: sex differences in language behavior in a therapeutic group. J Pragmatics. 1981;5:261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zimmer, Inc. Back in the Groove™ Community Healthcare Program. Available at: Accessed February 2010.

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cornelia M. Borkhoff
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gillian A. Hawker
    • 3
    • 4
  • James G. Wright
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Centre for Global Health, Institute of Population HealthUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Canadian Osteoarthritis Research ProgramWomen’s College HospitalTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of Health PolicyManagement and Evaluation, University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of MedicineWomen’s College HospitalTorontoCanada
  5. 5.Departments of Public Health Sciences and Health Policy, Management and EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  6. 6.Department of SurgeryThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations