Patient Gender Affects the Referral and Recommendation for Total Joint Arthroplasty
- First Online:
- 276 Downloads
Rates of use of total joint arthroplasty among appropriate and willing candidates are lower in women than in men. A number of factors may explain this gender disparity, including patients’ preferences for surgery, gender bias influencing physicians’ clinical decision-making, and the patient-physician interaction.
We propose a framework of how patient gender affects the patient and physician decision-making process of referral and recommendation for total joint arthroplasty and consider potential interventions to close the gender gap in total joint arthroplasty utilization.
The process involved in the referral and recommendation for total joint arthroplasty involves eight discrete steps. A systematic review is used to describe the influence of patient gender and related clinical and nonclinical factors at each step.
Where are we now?
Patient gender plays an important role in the process of referral and recommendation for total joint arthroplasty. Female gender primarily affects Steps 3 through 8, suggesting barriers unique to women exist in the patient-physician interaction.
Where do we need to go?
Developing and evaluating interventions that improve the quality of the patient-physician interaction should be the focus of future research.
How do we get there?
Potential interventions include using decision support tools that facilitate shared decision-making between patients and their physicians and promoting cultural competency and shared decision-making skills programs as a core component of medical education. Increasing physicians’ acceptance and awareness of the unconscious biases that may be influencing their clinical decision-making may require additional skills programs.
- 1.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services. 2004 National Healthcare Disparities Report. December 2004. AHRQ Publication Number 05-0014. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nhdr04/nhdr2004.pdf. Accessed November 29, 2010.
- 8.Borkhoff CM, Wieland ML, Myasoedova E, Ahmad Z, Welch V, Hawker GA, Li LC, Buchbinder R, Ueffing E, Beaton D, Cardiel MH, Gabriel SE, Guillemin F, Adebajo AO, Bombardier C, Hajjaj-Hassouni N, Tugwell P. Reaching those most in need: a scoping review of interventions to improve health care quality for disadvantaged populations with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63:39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L, Liang MH, Tanzer M, Ferland D, Phillips C, Partridge AJ, Belisle P, Fossel AH, Mahomed NN, Sledge CB, Katz JN. Outcomes of total hip replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:1722–1728.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.NIH Consensus Panel. NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement December 8–10, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1328–1335.Google Scholar
- 53.Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care Wait Times Health Initiative. Available at: http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/public/programs/waittimes/surgery. Accessed November 29, 2010.
- 69.Zimmer, Inc. Back in the Groove™ Community Healthcare Program. Available at: http://backinthegroove.zimmer.com/micro/z/ctl/op/global/action/1/id/3/template/MN/navid/28. Accessed February 2010.