Nonoperative versus Prophylactic Treatment of Bisphosphonate-associated Femoral Stress Fractures
Several studies have identified a specific fracture in the proximal diaphysis of the femur in patients treated with bisphosphonates. The fractures typically are sustained after a low-energy mechanism with the presence of an existing characteristic stress fracture. However, it is unclear whether these patients are best treated nonoperatively or operatively.
What is the likelihood of nonoperatively treated bisphosphonate-associated femoral stress fractures progressing to completion and during what time period? If prophylactic fixation is performed, do patients have a shorter hospital length-of-stay compared with patients having surgical fixation after fracture completion?
Patients and Methods
We retrospectively searched for patients older than 50 years receiving bisphosphonate therapy, with either incomplete, nondisplaced stress fractures or completed, displaced fractures in the proximal diaphysis of the femur between July 2002 and April 2009. After applying exclusion criteria, we identified 34 patients with a total of 40 bisphosphonate-associated fractures. The average duration of bisphosphonate use was 77 months. Twenty-eight of 40 (70%) fractures were completed, displaced fractures. Six of the 12 nondisplaced stress fractures initially were treated nonoperatively. The remaining six stress fractures were treated with prophylactic cephalomedullary nail fixation. The minimum followup was 12 months (mean, 36.5 months; range, 12–72 months).
Five of the six stress fractures treated nonoperatively progressed to fracture completion and displacement at an average of 10 months (range, 3–18 months). The average hospital stay was 3.7 days for patients treated prophylactically and 6.0 days for patients treated after fracture completion.
Our data suggest nonoperative treatment of bisphosphonate-related femoral stress fractures is not a reliable way to treat these fractures as the majority progress to fracture completion. Prophylactic fixation of femoral stress fractures also reduces total hospital admission time.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Bisphosphonate medications are indicated for patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis and for patients with metastatic disease to the skeleton [16, 19, 20]. By decreasing the rate of bone resorption, bisphosphonate use causes increases in bone mineral density and stabilization of osteolytic lesions . As alendronate has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 1995, long-term use of bisphosphonates is becoming common in these patient populations.
Nonoperative treatment of femoral neck fractures generally is limited to stress fractures in the compressive trabeculae, while operative fixation has been recommended for fractures on the tension side of the femoral neck . Whether bisphosphonate-related stress fractures in the femoral subtrochanteric or high diaphyseal region should be treated nonoperatively or operatively is unclear. Nonoperative treatment includes modification of activities with partial weightbearing on the affected extremity using assistive devices and discontinuation of bisphosphonate use. Although this avoids surgical risks, the impact on quality of life and the costs associated with temporary disability need to be considered. Some surgeons at our institution anecdotally recommend prophylactic fixation as they believe this will prevent patient suffering, completion of the fracture, and related morbidities. However, prophylactic fixation requires a surgical procedure with associated risks.
Some studies of bisphosphonate-associated femoral stress fractures describe patients presenting with acute fractures after low-energy mechanisms [7, 10, 11, 14, 20]. These studies have been case reports or retrospective reviews of two to 25 patients that correlate the use of bisphosphonates, particularly alendronate, with the presence of the characteristic fracture. Taken together, these studies do not provide adequate information to suggest the best management practices for patients with bisphosphonate-associated stress fractures that have not yet completely fractured.
We therefore addressed the following questions: (1) What is the likelihood of nonoperatively treated bisphosphonate-associated femoral stress fractures progressing to fracture completion and during what time period? (2) If prophylactic fixation is performed, do patients have a shorter hospital length-of-stay compared with patients having surgical fixation after fracture completion?
Patients and Methods
Number of patients
Duration of bisphosphonate use†
< 5 years
> 5 years
Twenty-four patients (28 of the 40 fractures [70%]) presented with completed fractures and had no prior documentation of a stress fracture. The mechanism of injury in all of these patients was a fall from standing. Two of the 28 patients reported a “snap” in the affected extremity while ambulating just before the fall. None of the patients presented with bilateral completed bisphosphonate-associated femur fractures. Nine patients (12 of the 40 fractures [30%]) presented with bisphosphonate-associated femoral stress fractures. Six of these 12 fractures (50%) initially were treated nonoperatively, and six were treated with prophylactic cephalomedullary nailing.
Nonoperative management consisted of partial weightbearing with assistive devices (crutches) on the affected extremity until resolution of pain and radiographic documentation of fracture line disappearance. Patients were considered to have nonoperative treatment only if they were actively being followed for the stress fracture. Leg pain alone in the ipsilateral leg before presentation with a fracture was not considered nonoperative treatment.
All patients were allowed weightbearing as tolerated after the procedure and began mobilization with physical therapy on postoperative Day 1. Patients received physical therapy twice daily for approximately 30 minutes during their hospital admission. Assistive devices were curtailed based on patients’ needs, typically beginning with a walker and progressing to crutches. Bisphosphonate therapy was not continued.
Data collected included fracture type, mechanism of injury, presence of contralateral stress fracture, incidence/dose/duration of bisphosphonate use, medical history, course of nonoperative treatment if a known stress fracture was present, type of fixation, and length of hospital stay. Statistical analysis was performed with Student’s t test to compare the length of hospital stay between the two groups. Normality of data was assessed with skewness and kurtosis values (SPSS 19.0, Chicago, IL, USA).
Of the six bisphosphonate-associated femoral stress fractures treated nonoperatively, five progressed to fracture completion. The time to fracture completion in this group occurred at an average of 10 months (range, 3–18 months). Only one stress fracture did not have fracture completion after 1 year of nonoperative treatment.
For the six patients with six stress fractures prophylactically nailed before fracture completion, the average postoperative hospital stay was 3.7 days (range, 3–5 days; SD, 0.81 days; skewness, 0.9; kurtosis, −0.3). The 30 patients with 34 acute completed bisphosphonate-associated femur fractures had an average hospital stay of 6.0 days (range, 3–17 days; SD, 3.1 days; skewness, 1.9; kurtosis, 4.6), which was longer (p < 0.001) than that of patients who had prophylactic nailing of their stress fractures. Looking at only the four patients (five stress fractures) treated nonoperatively with fractures that progressed to fracture completion, the average length of hospital stay was 6.0 days (range, 5–7 days; SD, 0.83 days; skewness, .512; kurtosis, −0.612), which was longer (p < 0.003) than that of the patients who had prophylactic nailing of their stress fractures.
Of the 39 fractures (33 patients) treated with surgical fixation, radiographic union was evident in six of six (100%) prophylactically nailed stress fractures, five of five (100%) failed nonoperative displaced stress fractures, and 27 of 28 (96%) completed stress fractures. No patients who received prophylactic nailing experienced complications. Among patients presenting after fracture completion, one had a nonunion develop after surgery requiring a subsequent surgical procedure whereas another had a delayed union, which healed via nonoperative measures by 26 months followup. Two patients had hardware removed for symptomatic reasons after completion of fracture healing. There were no infections documented in any of the study patients.
Bisphosphonates have become the first-line therapy for patients with osteoporosis, with use of alendronate in women reducing the risk of clinical hip fractures by 36% and vertebral fractures by 44% . It is estimated approximately 190 million prescriptions for bisphosphonates have been made worldwide . Studies have described a specific fracture pattern that occurs in patients receiving long-term bisphosphonate therapy [7, 10, 11, 14, 20]. Neviaser et al.  performed a retrospective review of patients presenting with low-energy femoral shaft fractures. Of patients taking alendronate, 76% had a characteristic fracture in the femoral diaphysis. They describe this characteristic fracture as a “simple transverse fracture with a unicortical beak in an area of cortical hypertrophy.” The true mechanism of this bisphosphonate-related stress fracture is unknown, but it is believed bisphosphonate-related decreased bone turnover can lead to an accumulation of microtrauma, which may precipitate the generation of an insufficiency fracture that does not heal . Recognition of these femoral stress fractures after long-term bisphosphonate use is critical for orthopaedic surgeons given the widespread use of bisphosphonates. There are no current recommendations for the duration of treatment with bisphosphonates . Furthermore, the natural history and optimal management of bisphosphonate-associated fractures have not been well described. In this retrospective review, we addressed two questions: (1) What is the likelihood of nonoperatively treated bisphosphonate-associated femoral stress fractures progressing to completion and during what time period? (2) If prophylactic fixation is performed, do patients have a shorter hospital length-of-stay compared with patients having surgical fixation after fracture completion?
There are limitations to this study. First, with the retrospective study design some information was missing. In 19 of the 34 patients, there was clear evidence providing the precise duration of bisphosphonate use; the remaining patients had documented current use of bisphosphonates without known duration. In addition, not all patients had bilateral radiographs. It is our current practice to obtain bilateral radiographs for all patients presenting with possible bisphosphonate-related fractures. Second, the sample size of our study is small, particularly for patients presenting with nondisplaced femoral stress fractures. One explanation for the low number in this subgroup could be sampling bias as our patients were selected retrospectively from a fracture database with potential for underreporting of nondisplaced stress fractures. Third, our study did not aim to address what percentage of patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy had femoral stress fractures; this question would be better suited for large-scale epidemiologic studies. Likewise, there was no risk/benefit assessment of how many fractures may have been prevented by bisphosphonates compared with how many fractures might have been caused. Finally, our study was not randomized and potential confounders could have affected length of stay (age, comorbidities). A prospective randomized trial ultimately is needed to compare nonoperative versus prophylactic management.
Our observations suggest nonoperative management (partial weightbearing) of bisphosphonate-associated stress fractures has a high likelihood of failure with the majority of fractures progressing to fracture completion. Unlike femoral neck stress fractures, the clinical course and treatment algorithm for stress fractures in the subtrochanteric or high diaphyseal region are not well described. Ha et al.  recently reviewed the clinical course of 11 patients (14 fractures) with bisphosphonate-associated femoral stress fractures and found that five of the 14 fractures progressed to completion at a mean of 10 months. Five additional fractures were treated surgically owing to intractable pain even though secondary displacement did not develop. Although patients in our study had a higher rate of fracture completion, our study results are consistent with those of Ha et al. , in that the majority of the stress fractures required surgical intervention within 1 year.
We also observed that patients with stress fractures treated prophylactically with a cephalomedullary nail before fracture completion had a shorter postoperative hospital stay than patients who had surgical stabilization after fracture completion. One study suggests orthopaedic hospitalizations after hip fractures cost, on average, $391.93 per day . This number does not include the increased cost of intensive care unit stays, which one may speculate may be needed more frequently for patients who were not optimized for surgery in the elective setting.
Our review also suggests bisphosphonates other than alendronate are associated with bisphosphonate-associated proximal diaphyseal fractures. Current studies in the literature documenting bisphosphonate-associated femur fractures cite only alendronate as the bisphosphonate that patients were taking chronically [7, 10, 14]. Alendronate has been the most available bisphosphonate as it was the first approved by the FDA. The effects of alendronate continue for 5 years even after its discontinuation . The half-life of alendronate is reported as 126 months, whereas that of zoledronic acid is 146 hours and that of pamidronate is 28 hours . Despite the varying half-lives, the mechanism of action of these bisphosphonates is similar in that they all affect the osteoclast, leading to the accumulation of microtrauma and ultimately an insufficiency fracture [12, 13].
Our study adds to the literature of bisphosphonate-associated stress fractures and addresses a potential method of treatment. Given our observations, we recommend prophylactic fixation of bisphosphonate-associated stress fractures when identified. The number of patients who underwent prophylactic fixation in this study was small, but the high risk of stress fracture displacement and apparently more economic postoperative course for these patients suggest prophylactic fixation is a reasonable option.
- 1.Advisory Task Force on Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws, American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. American association of oral and maxillofacial surgeons position paper on bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;3:369–376.Google Scholar
- 2.Black DM, Kelly MP, Genant HK, Palermo L, Eastell R, Bucci-Rechtweg C, Cauley J, Leung PC, Boonen S, Santora A, de Papp A, Bauer DC; Fracture Intervention Trial Steering Committee; HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial Steering Committee. Bisphosphonates and fractures of the subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femur. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1761–1771.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Black DM, Schwartz AV, Ensrud KE, Cauley JA, Levis S, Quandt SA, Satterfield S, Wallace RB, Bauer DC, Palermo L, Wehren LE, Lombardi A, Santora AC, Cummings SR; FLEX Research Group. Effects of continuing or stopping alendronate after 5 years of treatment: the Fracture Intervention Trial Long-term Extension (FLEX): a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006;296:2927–2938.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, Applegate WB, Barrett-Connor E, Musliner TA, Palermo L, Prineas R, Rubin SM, Scott JC, Vogt T, Wallace R, Yates AJ, LaCroix AZ. Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. JAMA. 1998;280:2077–2082.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Haentjens P, Autier P, Barette M, Boonen S; Belgian Hip Fracture Study Group. The economic cost of hip fractures among elderly women: a one-year, prospective, observational cohort study with matched-pair analysis. Belgian Hip Fracture Study Group. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:493–500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Odvina CV, Zerwekh JE, Rao DS, Maalouf N, Gottschalk FA, Pak CY. Severely suppressed bone turnover: a potential complication of alendronate therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:1897–1899.Google Scholar
- 17.Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification. Fracture and dislocation compendium. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(suppl 1):v–ix, 1–154.Google Scholar
- 18.Physicians’ Desk Reference. 63rd Ed. Montvale, NJ: Thomson Reuters; 2009: 2005, 2341.Google Scholar