Advertisement

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 469, Issue 9, pp 2538–2543 | Cite as

Two-stage Reimplantation for Treating Prosthetic Shoulder Infections

  • Vani J. Sabesan
  • Jason C. Ho
  • David Kovacevic
  • Joseph P. Iannotti
Symposium: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Abstract

Background

Two-stage reimplantation for prosthetic joint infection reportedly has the lowest risk for recurrent infection. Most studies to date have evaluated revision surgery for infection using an anatomic prosthetic. As compared with anatomic prostheses, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is reported to have a higher rate of infection.

Questions/purposes

We determined reinfection rates, functional improvement, types and rates of complications, and influence of rotator cuff tissue on function for two-stage reimplantation for prosthetic joint infection treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 27 patients treated with a two-stage reimplantation for prosthetic shoulder infection using a uniform protocol for management of infection; of these, 17 had reverse shoulder arthroplasty at second-stage surgery. Types of organisms cultured, recurrence rates, complications, function, and radiographic followup were reviewed for all patients.

Results

One of the 17 patients had recurrence of infection. The mean (± SD) Penn shoulder scores for patients treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty improved from 24.9 ± 22.3 to 66.4 ± 20.8. The average motion at last followup was 123° ± 33° of forward flexion and 26° ± 8° of external rotation in patients treated with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The major complication rate was 35% in reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with five dislocations and one reinfection. There was no difference in final Penn score between patients with and without external rotation weakness.

Conclusions

Shoulder function and pain improved in patients treated with a second-stage reimplantation of a reverse prosthesis and the reinfection rate was low.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, case series. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Keywords

Rotator Cuff Shoulder Arthroplasty Prosthetic Joint Infection Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Braman JP, Sprague M, Bishop J, Lo IK, Lee EW, Flatow EL. The outcome of resection shoulder arthroplasty for recalcitrant shoulder infections. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15:549–553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheung EV, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Infection associated with hematoma formation after shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1363–1367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coste JS, Reig S, Trojani C, Berg M, Walch G, Boileau P. The management of infection in arthroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:65–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cuff DJ, Virani NA, Levy J, Frankle MA, Derasari A, Hines B, Pupello DR, Cancio M, Mighell M. The treatment of deep shoulder infection and glenohumeral instability with debridement, reverse shoulder arthroplasty and postoperative antibiotics. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:336–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dodson CC, Craig EV, Cordasco FA, Dines DM, Dines JS, Dicarlo E, Brause BD, Warren RF. Propionibacterium acnes infection after shoulder arthroplasty: a diagnostic challenge. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:303–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frankle M, Siegal S, Pupello D, Saleem A, Mighell M, Vasey M. The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency: a minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1697–1705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ince A, Seemann K, Frommelt L, Katzer A, Loehr JF. One-stage exchange shoulder arthroplasty for peri-prosthetic infection. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:814–818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kelly JD, Hobgood ER. Positive culture rate in revision shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2343–2348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leggin BG, Michener LA, Shaffer MA, Brenneman SK, Iannotti JP, Williams GR. The Penn shoulder score: reliability and validity. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36:138–151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mileti J, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of postinfectious glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:609–614.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ramsey ML, Fenlin JM. Use of an antibiotic-impregnated bone cement block in the revision of an infected shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996;5:479–482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rispoli DM, Sperling JW, Athwal GS, Schleck CD, Cofield RH. Pain relief and functional results after resection arthroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1184–1187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sperling JW, Kozak TK, Hanssen AD, Cofield RH. Infection after shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;382:206–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Strickland JP, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. The results of two-stage re-implantation for infected shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:460–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vani J. Sabesan
    • 1
  • Jason C. Ho
    • 2
  • David Kovacevic
    • 1
  • Joseph P. Iannotti
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, A-41The Cleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations