Examining Sex and Gender Disparities in Total Joint Arthroplasty
- 229 Downloads
Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is remarkably successful for treating osteoarthritis: most patients see substantial gains in function. However, there are considerable geographic, racial, and gender variations in the utilization of these procedures. The reasons for these differences are complex.
We examined sex and gender disparities in TJA.
Through Medline/PubMed searches, we identified 632 articles and from these selected 61 for our review.
Where are we now?
A number of factors might explain sex and gender disparities in TJA: underrepresentation in clinical trials, differences in willingness to undergo surgery, pain responses to underlying disease and treatment, patient-physician relationships, treatment preferences, provider-level factors such as physician-patient communication style, and system-level factors such as access to specialist care. Since women have a higher prevalence of arthritis and degenerative joint diseases and overall demand for these procedures will continue to grow, the need to understand why there is a gap in utilization based on gender is imperative.
Where do we need to go?
Understanding what exactly is meant by “disparity” is essential because it is possible anatomic factors may have different impacts on utilization from cultural factors. Ideally, information about these factors should be integrated into the decision-making process so that patients and providers can make the most informed choice about whether or not to undergo the procedure.
How do we get there?
To better understand all of the potential reasons for how anatomic and cultural factors related to sex and gender might impact decision-making and overall utilization of TJA, more research focusing on these factors must be designed and carried out.
- 1.Akhter N, Milford-Beland S, Roe MT, Piana RN, Kao J, Shroff A. Gender differences among patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR). Am Heart J. 2009;157:141–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The Burden of Musculoskeletal Diseases in the United States. Rosemont, IL: AAOS; 2008.Google Scholar
- 4.Anderson RE, Crespo CJ, Ling SM, Bathon JM, Bartlett SJ. Prevalence of significant knee pain among older Americans: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47:1435–1438.Google Scholar
- 15.Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L, Liang MH, Tanzer M, Ferland D, Phillips C, Partridge AJ, Bélisle P, Fossel AH, Mahomed N, Sledge CB, Katz JN. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:1722–1728.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Hanna FS, Teichtahl AJ, Wluka AE, Wang Y, Urquhart DM, English DR, Giles GG, Cicuttini FM. Women have increased rates of cartilage loss and progression of cartilage defects at the knee than men: a gender study of adults without clinical knee osteoarthritis. Menopause. 2009;16:16:666–670.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health Interview Survey, Adult Sample, 2005. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/nhis_2005_data_release.htm. Accessed December 13, 2010.
- 34.National Institutes of Health. NIH guidelines on the inclusion of women and minorities as subjects in clinical research. Fed Regist. 1994;59:14508–14513.Google Scholar
- 35.National Institutes of Health. NIH consensus statement on total knee replacement. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2003;20:1–34.Google Scholar
- 56.Tsang A, Korff MV, Less S, Alonso J, Karam E, Angermeyer MC, Borges GL, Bromet EJ, De GG, De GR, Gureje O, Lepine JP, Haro JM, Levinson D, Browne MA, Posada-Villa J, Seedat S, Watanabe M. Common chronic pain conditions in developed and developing countries: gender and age difference and comorbidity with depression-anxiety disorders. J Pain. 2008;9:883–891.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar