A History of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
- 1.3k Downloads
Management of the cuff-deficient arthritic shoulder has long been challenging. Early unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty systems were associated with high complication and implant failure rates. The evolution toward the modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty includes many variables of constrained shoulder arthroplasty designs.
This review explores the development of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, specifically describing (1) the evolution of reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs, (2) the biomechanical variations in the evolution of this arthroplasty, and (3) the current issues relevant to reverse shoulder arthroplasty today.
Using a PubMed search, the literature was explored for articles addressing reverse shoulder arthroplasty, focusing on those papers with historical context.
Results of the early designs were apparently poor, although they were not subjected to rigorous clinical research and usually reported only in secondary literature. We identified a trend of glenoid component failure in the early reverse designs. This trend was recognized and reported by authors as the reverse shoulder evolved. Authors reported greater pain relief and better function in reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the fundamental change of Grammont’s design (moving the center of rotation medially and distally). However, current reports suggest lingering concerns and challenges with today’s designs.
The history of reverse shoulder arthroplasty involves the designs of many forward-thinking surgeons. Many of these highly constrained systems failed, although more recent designs have demonstrated improved longevity and implant performance. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty requires ongoing study, with challenges and controversies remaining around present-day designs.
KeywordsRotator Cuff Shoulder Arthroplasty Rotator Cuff Repair Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
- 8.Burkhead WZ. History and development of prosthetic replacement of the glenohumeral joint. In: Williams GR, Yamaguchi K, Ramsey ML, Galatz LM, eds. Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005:3–10.Google Scholar
- 10.Cofield RH, Stauffer RN. The Bickel glenohumeral arthroplasty. In: Morrey BF, ed. Conference on Joint Replacement in the Upper Limb. London, UK: Institute of Mechanical Engineering; 1977:15–25.Google Scholar
- 12.Emery RJ, Bankes MJ. Shoulder replacement: historical perspectives. In: Walch G, Boileau P, eds. Shoulder Arthroplasty. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1999:3–9.Google Scholar
- 14.Fenlin JM Jr. Semi-constrained prosthesis for the rotator cuff deficient patient. Orthop Trans. 1985;9:55.Google Scholar
- 16.Grammont P, Trouilloud P, Laffay J, Deries X. Concept study and realization of a new total shoulder prosthesis. Rhumatologie. 1987;39:407–418.Google Scholar
- 17.Gristina AG, Webb LX. The Trispherical total shoulder replacement. In: Bayley I, Kessel L, eds. Shoulder Surgery. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1982:153–157.Google Scholar
- 24.Khazzam M, Fealy S. History and development of shoulder arthroplasty. In: Fealy S, Sperling JW, Warren RF, Craig EV, eds. Shoulder Arthroplasty. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc; 2008:1–9.Google Scholar
- 34.Neer CS 2nd. Shoulder Reconstruction. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1990.Google Scholar
- 40.Redfern TR, Wallace WA. History of shoulder replacement surgery. In: Wallace WA, ed. Joint Replacement in the Shoulder and Elbow. Oxford, UK: Butterworth and Heinemann; 1998:6–16.Google Scholar
- 45.Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff: results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:388–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Wolff R, Kölbel R. The history of shoulder joint replacement. In: Kölbel R, Helbig B, Blauth W, eds. Shoulder Replacement. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1987:3–13.Google Scholar