Direct Anterior Approach for Hip Resurfacing: Surgical Technique and Complications
- First Online:
The direct anterior approach (DAA) for hip resurfacing arthroplasty is a technically difficult approach but theoretically reduces the soft tissue trauma to the hip because it does not require muscle detachments from the bone. Furthermore, the patient is in the supine position facilitating fluoroscopy to control component placement. However, the complications associated with the learning curve and functional outcome scores are not well defined in the literature.
We therefore asked how our first 57 operations using the anterior approach and special table extension compared with that in the literature with regard to (1) complication rate; (2) functional outcome scores; (3) component placement; and (4) length of stay.
We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients who underwent 57 hip resurfacing procedures using a DAA. There were 45 men and six women with an average age of 51 years (range, 31–63 years) and a body mass index of 28.7 kg/m2 (range, 19.7–42.0 kg/m2). The minimum followup was 0.3 months (mean, 8.7 months; range, 0.3–24.9 months).
There were three atraumatic (5%) and one posttraumatic (1.8%) femoral neck fractures. Average HOOS scores were equal to or better than averages reported for total hip arthroplasty. Average cup inclination was 36.5° (range, 25°–48°). The average length of stay was 2.11 days (range, 1–4 days).
The surgical approach for anterior hip resurfacing is technically difficult but may have some clinical benefits. Surgeons interested in using the DAA for hip resurfacing should be very familiar with the DAA for total hip arthroplasty and with hip resurfacing.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, retrospective study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
- 7.Kapandji IA. The Physiology of the Joints. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1987.Google Scholar
- 8.Kreuzer SW, Matta J. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen approach. Monogram of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2007:1–14.Google Scholar
- 10.Le Duff MJ, Wisk LE, Amstutz HC. Range of Motion after stemmed total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing. Bull NYU Hosp Joint Dis. 2009;67:177–181.Google Scholar
- 24.Steffen RT, De Smet KA, Murray DW, Gill HS. A modified posterior approach preserves femoral head oxgenation during hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Mar 22 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
- 25.Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:167–170.Google Scholar