What Are the Instability and Infection Rates After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty?
- 608 Downloads
A concern regarding reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is the possibly higher complication rate compared with conventional unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty.
We determined (1) the rate of instability and infection; (2) whether diagnosis influenced instability and infection rates; and (3) whether these complications affect ASES, Constant, and WOOS scores after RSA.
A prospective database, clinical charts, and radiographs of 284 patients who had undergone primary (n = 212 patients) or revision (n = 72 patients) RSA were reviewed to identify patients whose postoperative course was complicated by instability or infection.
The rate of instability was similar in patients with primary (eleven of 212 [5%)] and revision (six of 72 [8%]) reverse arthroplasty. The rate of infection was higher in the revision (five of 72 [7%]) than in the primary (three of 212 [1%]) group. Patients with an irreparable subscapularis tendon had a higher rate of instability (14 of 123 [12%]) compared with patients with a repairable subscapularis tendon (one of 161 [less than 1%]). The fracture sequelae group had the highest rate of instability (seven of 25 [28%]) among diagnoses within the primary group. The rates of infection were similar between the diagnoses within the primary group. The improvements in the ASES score, the Constant score, and the WOOS score from preoperatively to postoperatively were better in the no instability/infection group as compared with the instability/infection group.
This information confirms the available literature allowing surgeons to give patients realistic expectations regarding the infection and instability rates after RSA.
Level of Evidence
Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
KeywordsRotator Cuff Arthropathy Constant Score Instability Rate Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
- 1.Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM, Balg F. Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(Suppl S):147S–161S.Google Scholar
- 7.Gartsman GM, Edwards TB. Shoulder Arthroplasty. 1st ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Elsevier; 2008.Google Scholar
- 14.Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huguet D, Lautman S. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive and nonrepairable cuff rupture. In: Walch G, Boileau P, Mole D, eds. Shoulder Prosthesis: Two to Ten Year Follow-up. Montpellier, France: Sauramps Medical; 2001:247–252.Google Scholar
- 15.Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:388–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Valenti PH, Boutens D, Nerot C. Delta 3 reversed prosthesis for osteoarthritis with massive rotator cuff tear: long-term results (> 5 years). In: Walch G, Boileau P, Mole D, eds. Shoulder Prosthesis: Two to Ten Year Follow-up. Montpellier, France: Sauramps Medical; 2001:253–259.Google Scholar