Outcomes of Nonoperatively Treated Displaced Scapular Body Fractures
- 372 Downloads
Displaced scapular body fractures most commonly are treated conservatively. However there is conflicting evidence in the literature regarding the outcomes owing to retrospective design of studies, different classification systems, and diverse outcome tools.
The functional outcome after nonoperative management of displaced scapular body fractures was assessed by change in the DASH (Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score; (2) the radiographic outcome was assessed by the change of the glenopolar angle (GPA); and (3) associated scapular and extrascapular injuries that may affect outcome were identified.
Patients and Methods
Forty-nine consecutive patients were treated with early passive and active ROM exercises for a displaced scapular body fracture. We followed 32 of these patients (65.3%) for a minimum of 6 months (mean, 15 months; range, 6–33 months). Mean age of the patients was 46.9 years (range, 21–84 years) and the mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 21.5 (range, 5–50). Subjective functional results (DASH score) and radiographic assessment (fracture union, glenopolar angle) were measured.
All fractures healed uneventfully. The mean change of glenopolar angle was 9° (range, 0°–20°). The mean change of the DASH score was 10.2, which is a change with minimal clinical importance. There was a correlation between the change in this score with the ISS and presence of rib fractures.
Satisfactory outcomes are reported with nonoperative treatment of displaced scapular body fractures. We have shown that the severity of ISS and the presence of rib fractures adversely affect the clinical outcome.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
KeywordsRotator Cuff Injury Severity Score Nonoperative Management Clavicle Fracture Dash Score
We thank Lauren O’Keefe, Research Assistant, and Yiota Louka, BS, for technical support during preparation of the manuscript.
- 6.Bestard EA, Schoene SH, Bestard EH. Glenoplasty in the management of recurrent shoulder dislocation. Contemp Orthop. 1986;12:47–55.Google Scholar
- 9.Cole PA. Scapula fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002;33:1–18, vii.Google Scholar
- 13.Getahun TY, MacDermid JC, Patterson SD. Concurrent validity of patient rating scales in assessment of outcome after rotator cuff repair. J Musculoskelet Res. 2000;4:114–127.Google Scholar
- 24.Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, Prokuski L, Sirkin MS, Ziran B, Henley B, Audigé L. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database, and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(10 suppl):S1–S133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Pape HC, Auf’m’Kolk M, Paffrath T, regel G, Sturm JA, Tscherne H. Primary intramedullary fixation in polytrauma patients with associated lung contusion: a cause of posttraumatic ARDS? J Trauma. 1993;34:540–547; discussion 547–548.Google Scholar
- 33.Reynolds MA, Richardson JD, Spain DA, Seligson D, Wilson MA, Miller FB. Is timing of fracture fixation important for the patient with multiple trauma? Ann Surg. 1995;222:470–478; discussion 478–481.Google Scholar