Advertisement

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 469, Issue 6, pp 1677–1682 | Cite as

Preoperative Radiographic Assessment of Limb-length Discrepancy in Total Hip Arthroplasty

  • Geert MeermansEmail author
  • Ahmad Malik
  • Johan Witt
  • Fares Haddad
Clinical Research

Abstract

Background

Pelvic radiographs are helpful in assessing limb-length discrepancy (LLD) before and after THA but are subject to variation. Different methods are used to determine LLDs. As a pelvic reference, both ischial tuberosities and the teardrops are used, and as a femoral reference, the lesser trochanter and center of the femoral head are used.

Questions/purposes

We validated the different methods for preoperative radiographic measurement of LLDs and evaluated their reliability.

Patients and Methods

LLDs were measured on full-leg radiographs for 52 patients (29 men, 23 women) with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and compared with different methods for measuring LLDs on AP radiographs of the pelvis.

Results

The true LLD varied from −8.0 to 9.1 mm. When the biischial line was used as a pelvic reference, the LLD measured on AP pelvis radiographs was different from the true LLD. No difference was found when the interteardrop line was used as a pelvic reference. There was substantial interobserver agreement when the lesser trochanter was used as a femoral reference (kappa = 0.66–0.70) and excellent interobserver and intraobserver agreement for all other measurements (kappa = 0.84–0.93).

Conclusions

Our data show use of the biischial line as a pelvic reference should be discouraged and the interteardrop line is a better alternative. The center of the femoral head is a more reliable femoral landmark compared with the lesser trochanter.

Level of Evidence

Level I, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Keywords

Femoral Head Limb Length Ischial Tuberosity Pelvic Radiograph Femoral Reference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Abraham WD, Dimon JH 3rd. Leg length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992;23:201–209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Austin MS, Hozack WJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH. Stability and leg length equality in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(3 suppl 1):88–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bal BS. A technique for comparison of leg lengths during total hip replacement. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1996;25:61–62.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blackley HR, Howell GE, Rorabeck CH. Planning and management of the difficult primary hip replacement: preoperative planning and technical considerations. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:3–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bono JV. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(suppl 2):118–122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bose WJ. Accurate limb-length equalization during total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2000;23:433–436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH. Soft tissue balancing: the hip. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4 suppl 1):17–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clark CR, Huddleston HD, Schoch EP 3rd, Thomas BJ. Leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:38–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cummings G, Scholz JP, Barnes K. The effect of imposed leg length difference on pelvic bone symmetry. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18:368–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dolhain P, Tsigaras H, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Mac Donald S, Mc Calden R. The effectiveness of dual offset stems in restoring offset during total hip replacement. Acta Orthop Belg. 2002;68:490–499.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edeen J, Sharkey PF, Alexander AH. Clinical significance of leg-length inequality after total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1995;24:347–351.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eggli S, Pisan M, Müller ME. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:382–390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Friberg O. Clinical symptoms and biomechanics of lumbar spine and hip joint in leg length inequality. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983;8:643–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giles LG, Taylor JR. Low-back pain associated with leg length inequality. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981;6:510–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gonzalez Della Valle A, Slullitel G, Piccaluga F, Salvati EA. The precision and usefulness of preoperative planning for cemented and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:51–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goodman SB, Adler SJ, Fyhrie DP, Schurman DJ. The acetabular teardrop and its relevance to acetabular migration. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;236:199–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gurney B, Mermier C, Robergs R, Gibson A, Rivero D. Effects of limb-length discrepancy on gait economy and lower-extremity muscle activity in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:907–915.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hananouchi T, Sugano N, Nakamura N, Nishii T, Miki H, Yamamura M, Yoshikawa H. Preoperative templating of femoral components on plain X-rays: rotational evaluation with synthetic X-rays on ORTHODOC. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127:381–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hofmann AA, Skrzynski MC. Leg-length inequality and nerve palsy in total hip arthroplasty: a lawyer awaits! Orthopedics. 2000;23:943–944.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hoikka V, Santavirta S, Eskola A, Paavilainen T, Wirta J, Lindholm TS. Methodology for restoring functional leg length in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1991;6:189–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huddleston HD. An accurate method for measuring leg length and hip offset in hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1997;20:331–332.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jasty M, Webster W, Harris W. Management of limb length inequality during total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;333:165–171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khanduja V, Tek V, Scott G. The effect of a neck-retaining femoral implant on leg-length inequality following total hip arthroplasty: a radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:712–715.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Konyves A, Bannister GC. The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:155–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krishnan SP, Carrington RW, Mohiyaddin S, Garlick N. Common misconceptions of normal hip joint relations on pelvic radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:409–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lai KA, Lin CJ, Jou IM, Su FC. Gait analysis after total hip arthroplasty with leg-length equalization in women with unilateral congenital complete dislocation of the hip: comparison with untreated patients. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:1147–1152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Machen MS, Stevens PM. Should full-length standing anteroposterior radiographs replace the scanogram for measurement of limb length discrepancy? J Pediatr Orthop B. 2005;14:30–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Maloney WJ, Keeney JA. Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(4 suppl 1):108–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Matsuda K, Nakamura S, Matsushita T. A simple method to minimize limb-length discrepancy after hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:375–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McGee HM, Scott JH. A simple method of obtaining equal leg length in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;194:269–270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mihalko WM, Phillips MJ, Krackow KA. Acute sciatic and femoral neuritis following total hip arthroplasty: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:589–592.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Murphy SB, Ecker TM. Evaluation of a new leg length measurement algorithm in hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;463:85–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nercessian OA, Piccoluga F, Eftekhar NS. Postoperative sciatic and femoral nerve palsy with reference to leg lengthening and medialization/lateralization of the hip joint following total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;304:165–171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Bissett GA, Rothman RH, Hozack WJ. Surgical treatment of limb-length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2310–2317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ranawat CS. The pants too short, the leg too long! Orthopedics. 1999;22:845–846.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ranawat CS, Rao RR, Rodriguez JA, Bhende HS. Correction of limb-length inequality during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:715–720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ranawat CS, Rodriguez JA. Functional leg-length inequality following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:359–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rand JA, Ilstrup DM. Comparison of Charnley and T-28 total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;180:201–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rösler J, Perka C. The effect of anatomical positional relationships on kinetic parameters after total hip replacement. Int Orthop. 2000;24:23–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sarin VK, Pratt WR, Bradley GW. Accurate femur repositioning is critical during intraoperative total hip arthroplasty length and offset assessment. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:887–891.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sathappan SS, Ginat D, Patel V, Walsh M, Jaffe WL, Di Cesare PE. Effect of anesthesia type on limb length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:203–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schmalzried TP. Preoperative templating and biomechanics in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2005;28(8 suppl):s849–851.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shiramizu K, Naito M, Shitama T, Nakamura Y, Shitama H. L-shaped caliper for limb length measurement during total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:966–969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;407:241–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Stone RG, Weeks LE, Hajdu M, Stinchfield FE. Evaluation of sciatic nerve compromise during total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;201:26–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Suh KT, Cheon SJ, Kim DW. Comparison of preoperative templating with postoperative assessment in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:40–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C, Burckhardt K, Langlotz F, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:182–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Unnanuntana A, Wagner D, Goodman SB. The accuracy of preoperative templating in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:180–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Weber ER, Daube JR, Coventry MB. Peripheral neuropathies associated with total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:66–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wedemeyer C, Quitmann H, Xu J, Heep H, von Knoch M, Saxler G. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty with the Mayo stem. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:1023–1029.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    White AB. AAOS Committee on Professional Liability: Study of 119 closed malpractice claims involving hip replacement. AAOS Bulletin. July 1994.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    White TO, Dougall TW. Arthroplasty of the hip: leg length is not important. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:335–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Williamson JA, Reckling FW. Limb length discrepancy and related problems following total hip joint replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;134:135–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wixson RL, MacDonald MA. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(7 suppl 3):51–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1295–1306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Woolson ST. Leg length equalization during total hip replacement. Orthopedics. 1990;13:17–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Woolson ST, Hartford JM, Sawyer A. Results of a method of leg-length equalization for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:159–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geert Meermans
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ahmad Malik
    • 1
  • Johan Witt
    • 1
  • Fares Haddad
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsUniversity College London HospitalLondonUK
  2. 2.BerchemBelgium

Personalised recommendations