Algorithm for Femoral and Periacetabular Osteotomies in Complex Hip Deformities
- 778 Downloads
Residual acetabular dysplasia of the hip in most patients can be corrected by periacetabular osteotomy. However, some patients have intraarticular abnormalities causing insufficient coverage, containment or congruency after periacetabular osteotomy, or extraarticular abnormalities that limit either acetabular correction or hip motion. For these patients, we believe an additional proximal femoral osteotomy can improve coverage, containment, congruency and/or motion.
We provide algorithms for (1) identifying patients we believe will benefit from proximal femoral osteotomy, (2) selecting the appropriate osteotomy, and (3) choosing the sequence of these osteotomies.
Anteroposterior, false-profile and functional radiographs and MR can identify most patients we believe will benefit from periacetabular and femoral osteotomies. Recently described techniques, including relative femoral neck lengthening, femoral neck osteotomy and femoral head osteotomy have expanded indications for a combined procedure. Historically performed first, periacetabular osteotomy is now frequently performed following femoral osteotomy.
The rate of intertrochanteric osteotomy performed with periacetabular osteotomy has decreased from approximately 10% in the first 500 surgeries to about 2% currently. Among 151 relative neck lengthenings (23 with PAO), 53 femoral neck osteotomies (4 with PAO) and 14 femoral head osteotomies (11 with PAO), eleven complications occurred including osteonecrosis in two and delayed unions in eight. No complication occurred following a combined procedure.
Although isolated periacetabular osteotomy can provide sufficient coverage, containment and congruency for most patients with residual hip dysplasia, some may benefit from an additional proximal femoral osteotomy. Knowing the appropriate indications, selection, and sequencing of these osteotomies is critical for enhancing patient outcomes.
Level of Evidence
Level V, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
- 9.Ganz R, MacDonald SJ. Indications and modern techniques of proximal femoral osteotomies in the adult. Sem Arthroplasty. 1997;8:38–50.Google Scholar
- 29.Schatzker J. The intertrochnateric osteotomy. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1984.Google Scholar
- 35.Tönnis D. Congenital Dysplasia and Dislocation of the Hip in Children and Adults. New York, NY: Springer; 1987.Google Scholar
- 36.Tönnis D, Itoh K, Heinecke A, Behrens K. The management of congenital hip luxation with arthrographic control, an individual risk-reducing and time-saving method. I. Choice of method and risk assessment based on arthrographic findings [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1984;122:50–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.Tönnis D, Kasperczyk W. Acetabulum reorientation osteotomies: acetabuloplasty, spherical osteotomy, triple osteotomy of the pelvis. In: Reynolds D, Freeman M, eds. Osteoarthritis in the Young Adult Hip. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 1989:85–119.Google Scholar
- 40.Wagner H. Femoral osteotomies for congenital hip dislocation. In: Weil UH, ed. Acetabular Dysplasia, Skeletal Dysplasias in Childhood. Vol 2. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1978:85–105.Google Scholar