Second-generation Highly Cross-linked X3™ Polyethylene Wear: A Preliminary Radiostereometric Analysis Study
First-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene liners have reduced the incidence of wear particle-induced osteolysis. However, failed acetabular liners have shown evidence of surface cracking, mechanical failure, and oxidative damage. This has led to the development of second-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene, which has improved wear and mechanical properties and resistance to oxidation in vitro. Owing to its recent introduction, there are no publications describing its clinical performance.
We assessed early clinical wear of a second-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene liner and compared its clinical performance with the published results of hip simulator tests and with first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene annealed liners.
Patients and Methods
Twenty-one patients were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Clinical outcome and femoral head penetration were measured for 19 patients at 6 months and 1 and 2 years postoperatively.
The median proximal head penetration was 0.009 mm and 0.024 mm at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The median two-dimensional (2-D) head penetration was 0.083 mm and 0.060 mm at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The median proximal wear rate between 1 and 2 years was 0.015 mm/year.
The wear rate calculated was similar to the in vitro wear rate reported for this material; however, it was less than the detection threshold for this technique. Although longer followup is required for wear to reach a clinically quantifiable level, this low level of wear is encouraging for the future clinical performance of this material.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
- 1.Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1991.Google Scholar
- 2.Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide, Australia: AOA; 2008.Google Scholar
- 3.Avery J, Dal Grande E, Taylor A. Quality Of Life in South Australia as Measured by the SF12 Health Status Questionnaire Population Norms For 2003 Trends From 1997–2003. Population Research and Outcome Studies Unit Department of Human Services, Adelaide, South Australia; 2004.Google Scholar
- 9.Campbell D, Mercer G, Nilsson K, Wells V, Field JR, Callary SA. Wear of a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner: a preliminary RSA study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2009; DOI 10.1007/s00590-009-0486-y.
- 20.Engh CA Jr, Stepniewski AS, Ginn SD, Beykirch SE, Sychterz-Terefenko CJ, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA. A randomized prospective evaluation of outcomes after total hip arthroplasty using cross-linked marathon and non-cross-linked Enduron polyethylene liners. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(6 suppl 2):17–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 46.Schmalzried TP, Kwong LM, Jasty M, Sedlacek RC, Haire TC, O’Connor DO, Bragdon CR, Kabo JM, Malcolm AJ, Harris WH. The mechanism of loosening of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty: analysis of specimens retrieved at autopsy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;274:60–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 50.von Schewelov T, Onsten I, Markusson P, Carlsson A. Weight bearing radiographs are not necessary for measurement of polyethylene penetration in total hip prostheses: a radiostereometric study of 111 patients examined in weight-bearing and supine position. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:104–108.Google Scholar
- 51.von Schewelov T, Sanzen L, Borlin N, Markusson P, Onsten I. Accuracy of radiographic and radiostereometric wear measurement of different hip prostheses: an experimental study. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:691–700.Google Scholar