Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 468, Issue 2, pp 581–589 | Cite as

Surgical Treatment of Grade I Central Chondrosarcoma

  • Davide DonatiEmail author
  • Simone Colangeli
  • Marco Colangeli
  • Claudia Di Bella
  • Franco Bertoni
Clinical Research


The grade of chondrosarcoma relates to the likelihood of local recurrence and metastases. Many Grade I chondrosarcomas behave benignly if aggressively, and the question arises regarding whether wide resection is essential to control the disease. We therefore asked whether intralesional surgery also could be extended to Grade I chondrosarcomas without an increase in recurrence. We retrospectively reviewed 31 patients with Grade I chondrosarcomas of the limbs. The minimum followup was 66 months (mean, 157 months; range, 66–296 months). None of the 16 patients treated by resection had recurrences during the followup and two of the 15 patients with intralesional excision had recurrences, both of which resolved with resection of the site involved by the recurrence without progression of the disease. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores averaged 72% in patients treated with wide resection compared with 89% in the 15 patients treated by intralesional surgery. The two recurrences occurred in patients whose radiographs showed thinning of the cortex combined with bone enlargement and marked endosteal scalloping; histologic examination in these two patients also showed a correlation between radiographic aggressiveness and the presence of myxoid areas and hypercellularity.

Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Local Recurrence Wide Resection Intralesional Curettage Bone Enlargement Myxoid Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Ayala G, Liu C, Nicosia R, Horowitz S, Lackman R. Microvasculature and VEGF expression in cartilage tumors. Hum Pathol. 2000;31:341–346.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauer HC, Brosjo O, Kreicbergs A, Lindholm J. Low risk of recurrence of enchondroma and low grade chondrosarcoma in extremities: 80 patients followed for 2–25 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995;66:283–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brien EW, Mirra JM, Kerr R. Benign and malignant cartilage tumors of bone and joint: their anatomic and theoretical basis with emphasis on radiology, pathology and clinical biology: I The intramedullary cartilage tumors. Skeletal Radiol. 1997;26:325–353.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Campanacci M. Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors. Ed 2. Wien, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1999.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Beuckeleer LH, De Schepper AM, Ramon F, Somville J. Magnetic resonance imaging of cartilaginous tumors: a retrospective study of 79 patients. Eur J Radiol. 1995;21:34–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Enneking W, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:241–246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eriksson AI, Schiller A, Mankin HJ. The management of chondrosarcoma of bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;153:44–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geirnaerdt MJ, Hermans J, Bloem JL, Kroon HM, Pope TL, Taminiau AH, Hogendoorn PC. Usefulness of radiography in differentiating enchondroma from central grade 1 chondrosarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1097–1104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Helfenstein A, Frahm SO, Krams M, Drescher W, Parwaresch R, Hassenpflug J. Minichromosome maintenance protein (MCM6) in low-grade chondrosarcoma: distinction from enchondroma and identification of progressive tumors. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;122:912–918.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Higuchi T, Taki J, Sumiya H, Kinuya S, Nakajima K, Namura M, Tonami N. Characterization of cartilaginous tumors with 201Tl scintigraphy. Ann Nucl Med. 2005;19:95–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jelthi A, Forest M, Tomeno B, Abelanet R. [Bone reabsorption and remodeling in chondrosarcomas of the limbs and pelvis: diagnostic value in 84 cases] [in French]. Ann Pathol. 1987;7:198–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee FY, Mankin HJ, Fondren G, Gebhardt MC, Springfield DS, Rosenberg AE, Jennings LC. Chondrosarcoma of bone: an assessment of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:326–338.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leerapun T, Hugate RR, Inwards CY, Scully SP, Sim FH. Surgical management of conventional grade I chondrosarcoma of long bones. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;463:166–172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Littrell LA, Wenger DE, Wold LE, Bertoni F, Unni KK, White LM, Kandel R, Sundaram M. Radiographic, CT, and MR imaging features of dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas: a retrospective review of 174 de novo cases. Radiographics. 2004;24:1397–1409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marco RA, Gitelis S, Brebach GT, Healey JH. Cartilage tumors: evaluation and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:292–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mirra JM, Gold R, Downs J, Eckardt JJ. A new histologic approach to the differentiation of enchondroma and chondrosarcoma of the bones: a clinicopathologic analysis of 51 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;201:214–237.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, Boyea SR, Bojescul JA, Sweet DE, Temple HT. Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features. Radiographics. 1998;18:1213–1237; quiz 1244–1245.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reith JD, Horodyski MB, Scarborough MT. Grade 2 chondrosarcoma: stage I or stage II tumor? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;415:45–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rizzo M, Ghert MA, Harrelson JM, Scully SP. Chondrosarcoma of bone: analysis of 108 cases and evaluation for predictors of outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;391:224–233.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sanerkin NG. The diagnosis and grading of chondrosarcoma of bone: a combined cytologic and histologic approach. Cancer. 1980;45:582–594.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schiller AL. Diagnosis of borderline cartilage lesions of bone. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1985;2:42–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Springfield DS, Gebhardt MC, McGuire MH. Chondrosarcoma: a review. Instr Course Lect. 1996;45:417–424.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Unni KK. Cartilaginous lesions of bone. J Orthop Sci. 2001;6:457–472.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weiner SD. Enchondroma and chondrosarcoma of bone: clinical, radiologic, and histologic differentiation. Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:645–649.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Davide Donati
    • 1
    Email author
  • Simone Colangeli
    • 1
  • Marco Colangeli
    • 1
  • Claudia Di Bella
    • 1
  • Franco Bertoni
    • 2
  1. 1.Musculoskeletal Oncology DepartmentRizzoli Orthopaedic InstituteBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Pathology of the Department of Musculoskeletal OncologyRizzoli Orthopaedic InstituteBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations