Periacetabular Reconstruction with a New Endoprosthesis

  • Lawrence R. Menendez
  • Elke R. Ahlmann
  • Yuri Falkinstein
  • Daniel C. Allison
Symposium: Selected Papers Presented at the 2008 Meeting of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society

Abstract

Reconstruction of the Type II pelvic resection is challenging. Currently available reconstructive options have inherent problems including graft and implant failure, pain, poor function, and high major complication rates. The periacetabular reconstruction (PAR) endoprosthesis was designed to be secured with internal fixation and bone cement to the remaining ilium and support a reconstructed acetabulum. This construct potentially avoids the complications of graft or hardware failure, while maintaining early mobilization, comfort, limb lengths, and function. We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients who underwent Type II pelvic resection and reconstruction with the PAR endoprosthesis, analyzing function, complications, and survivorship. The minimum followup was 13 months (mean, 29.4 months; range, 13 to 108 months). We compared the PAR data with the literature for the Mark II saddle endoprosthesis. The PAR’s average MSTS score was 20.8 (67%), major complications occurred in 14 (56%), and implant survivorship was 84% at 2 years and 60% at 5 years. The rate of failure at the ilium-saddle interface was lower and implant survivorship higher than those in the published literature for the Mark II saddle. We recommend use of the PAR endoprosthesis for reconstruction of large defects following Type II pelvic resection. The modified saddle design provides greater inherent stability, allowing for faster rehabilitation and improved longevity without increased complications and is an improvement over the currently available saddle prostheses.

Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective case series. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

References

  1. 1.
    Aboulafia AJ, Buch R, Mathews J, Li W, Malawer MM. Reconstruction using the saddle prosthesis following excision of primary and metastatic periacetabular tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;314:203–213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abudu A, Grimer RJ, Cannon SR, Carter SR, Sneath RS. Reconstruction of the hemipelvis after the excision of malignant tumours. Complications and functional outcome of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:773–779.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aljassir F, Beadel GP, Turcotte RE, Griffin AM, Bell RS, Wunder JS, Isler MH. Outcome after pelvic sarcoma resection reconstructed with saddle prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:36–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Apffelstaedt JP, Driscoll DL, Spellman JE, Velez AF, Gibbs JF, Karakousis CP. Complications and outcome of external hemipelvectomy in the management of pelvic tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 1996;3:304–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beck LA, Einertson MJ, Winemiller MH, DePompolo RW, Hoppe KM, Sim FF. Functional outcomes and quality of life after tumor-related hemipelvectomy. Phys Ther. 2008;88:916–927.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bell RS, Davis AM, Wunder JS, Buconjic T, McGoveran B, Gross AE. Allograft reconstruction of the acetabulum after resection of stage-IIB sarcoma. Intermediate-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1663–1674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campanacci M, Capanna R. Pelvic resections: the Rizzoli Institute experience. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991;22:65–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Capanna R, Manfrini M, Pignatti G, Martelli C, Gamberini G, Campanacci M. Hemipelvectomy in malignant neoplasms of the hip region. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1990;16:425–437.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cottias P, Jeanrot C, Vinh TS, Tomeno B, Anract P. Complications and functional evaluation of 17 saddle prostheses for resection of periacetabular tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2001;78:90–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Delloye C, Banse X, Brichard B, Docquier PL, Cornu O. Pelvic reconstruction with a structural pelvic allograft after resection of a malignant bone tumor. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:579–587.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Enneking WF, Dunham WK. Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:731–746.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:241–246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Falkinstein Y, Ahlmann ER, Menendez LR. Reconstruction of type II pelvic resection with a new peri-acetabular reconstruction endoprosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:371–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fuchs B, O’Connor MI, Kaufman KR, Padgett DJ, Sim FH. Iliofemoral arthrodesis and pseudarthrosis: a long-term functional outcome evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;397:29–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gradinger R, Rechl H, Ascherl R, Plötz W, Hipp E. Partial endoprosthetic reconstruction of the pelvis in malignant tumors. Orthopade. 1993;22:167–173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guo W, Li D, Tang X, Yang Y, Ji T. Reconstruction with modular hemipelvic prostheses for periacetabular tumor. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;461:180–188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harrington KD. The use of hemipelvic allografts or autoclaved grafts for reconstruction after wide resections of malignant tumors of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:331–341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hillmann A, Hoffmann C, Gosheger G, Rödl R, Winkelmann W, Ozaki T. Tumors of the pelvis: complications after reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;123:340–344.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hillmann A, Rosenbaum D, Gosheger G, Hoffmann C, Rödl R, Winkelmann W. Rotationplasty Type B IIIa According to Winkelmann: Electromyography and Gait Analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;384:224–231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jaiswal PK, Aston WJ, Grimer RJ, Abudu A, Carter S, Blunn G, Briggs TW, Cannon S. Peri-acetabular resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction for tumours of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1222–1227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim HS, Kim KJ, Han I, Oh JH, Lee SH. The use of pasteurized autologous grafts for periacetabular reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:217–223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kitagawa Y, Ek ET, Choong PF. Pelvic reconstruction using saddle prosthesis following limb salvage operation for periacetabular tumour. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2006;14:155–162.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kotzar GM, Davy DT, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Berilla J, Heiple KG Jr, Brown RH, Burstein AH. Telemeterized in vivo hip joint force data: a report on two patients after total hip surgery. J Orthop Res. 1991;9:621–633.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Langlais F, Lambotte JC, Thomazeau H. Long-term results of hemipelvis reconstruction with allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:178–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marco RA, Sheth DS, Boland PJ, Wunder JS, Siegel JA, Healey JH. Functional and oncological outcome of acetabular reconstruction for the treatment of metastatic disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:642–651.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nieder E, Elson RA, Engelbrecht E, Kasselt MR, Keller A, Steinbrink K. The saddle prosthesis for salvage of the destroyed acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:1014–1022.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ozaki T, Hoffmann C, Hillmann A, Gosheger G, Lindner N, Winkelmann W. Implantation of hemipelvic prosthesis after resection of sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;396:197–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Renard AJ, Veth RP, Schreuder HW, Pruszczynski M, Keller A, van Hoesel Q, Bökkerink JP. The saddle prosthesis in pelvic primary and secondary musculoskeletal tumors: functional results at several postoperative intervals. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:188–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Satcher RL Jr, O’Donnell RJ, Johnston JO. Reconstruction of the pelvis after resection of tumors about the acetabulum. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;409:209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Takami M, Ieguchi M, Takamatsu K, Kitano T, Aono M, Ishida T, Yamano Y. Functional evaluation of flail hip joint after periacetabular resection of the pelvis. Osaka City Med J. 1997;43:173–183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Windhager R, Karner J, Kutschera HP, Polterauer P, Salzer-Kuntschik M, Kotz R. Limb salvage in periacetabular sarcomas: review of 21 consecutive cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:265–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yoshida Y, Osaka S, Mankin HJ. Hemipelvic allograft reconstruction after periacetabular bone tumor resection. J Orthop Sci. 2000;5:198–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence R. Menendez
    • 1
  • Elke R. Ahlmann
    • 2
  • Yuri Falkinstein
    • 3
  • Daniel C. Allison
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedics, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern California + Los Angeles County Medical Center, USC University HospitalLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of OrthopedicsUniversity of Southern California + Los Angeles County Medical CenterLos Angeles USA
  3. 3.Department of Orthopedics, Division of Spine SurgeryProvidence Saint Joseph Medical CenterBurbank USA
  4. 4.Department of Orthopedics, Division of Musculoskeletal OncologySouthern California Permanente Medical GroupBaldwin ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations