Advertisement

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 468, Issue 3, pp 717–722 | Cite as

Shoulder Arthroplasties have Fewer Complications than Hip or Knee Arthroplasties in US Veterans

  • Edward V. Fehringer
  • Ted R. Mikuls
  • Kaleb D. Michaud
  • William G. Henderson
  • James R. O’Dell
Clinical Research

Abstract

Total shoulder arthroplasties (TSA) are being performed more commonly for treatment of arthritis, although fewer than either hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasties. Total shoulder arthroplasty also provides general health improvements that are comparable to THA. One study suggests TSAs are associated with lower morbidity and mortality than THAs and TKAs. To confirm and extend that study, we therefore examined the association of patient characteristics (sociodemographics, comorbid illness, and other risk factors) with 30-day complications for patients undergoing TSAs, THAs, or TKAs. We used data from the Veterans Administration (VA) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) for fiscal years 1999 to 2006. Sociodemographics, comorbidities, health behaviors, operative factors, and complications (mortality, return to the operating room, readmission within 14 days, cardiovascular events, and infections) were available for 10,407 THAs, 23,042 TKAs, and 793 TSAs. Sociodemographic features were comparable among groups. The mean operative time was greater for TSAs (3.0 hours) than for TKAs (2.2 hours) and THAs (2.4 hours). The 30-day mortality rates were 1.2%, 1.1%, and 0.4% for THAs, TKAs, and TSAs, respectively. The corresponding postoperative complication rates were 7.6%, 6.8%, and 2.8%. Adjusting for multiple risk factors, complications, readmissions, and postoperative stays were less for TSAs versus THAs and TKAs. In a VA population, TSAs required more operative time but resulted in shorter stays, fewer complications, and fewer readmissions than THAs and TKAs.

Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Keywords

Veteran Health Administration Total Joint Arthroplasty Total Shoulder Arthroplasties Veteran Health Administration Veteran Health Administration Hospital 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams JE, Sperling JW, Hoskin TL, Melton LJ 3rd, Cofield RH. Shoulder arthroplasty in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976–2000: a population-based study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15:50–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allison PD. Logistic Regression Using SAS System: Theory and Application. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1999.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boorman RS, Kopjar B, Fehringer E, Churchill RS, Smith K, Matsen FA 3rd. The effect of total shoulder arthroplasty on self-assessed health status is comparable to that of total hip arthroplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12:158–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bryant D, Litchfield R, Sandow M, Gartsman GM, Guyatt G, Kirkley A. A comparison of pain, strength, range of motion, and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1947–1956.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cowper DC, Kubal JD, Maynard C, Hynes DM. A primer and comparative review of major US mortality databases. Ann Epidemiol. 2002;12:462–468.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daley J, Forbes MG, Young GJ, Charns MP, Gibbs JO, Hur K, Henderson W, Khuri SF. Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: site visit assessment of process and structure. National VA Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:341–351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Farmer KW, Hammond JW, Queale WS, Keyurapan E, McFarland EG. Shoulder arthroplasty versus hip and knee arthroplasties: a comparison of outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;455:183–189.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fehringer EV, Kopjar B, Boorman RS, Churchill RS, Smith KL, Matsen FA 3rd. Characterizing the functional improvement after total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1349–1353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Franta AK, Lenters TR, Mounce D, Neradilek B, Matsen FA 3rd. The complex characteristics of 282 unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:555–562.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ibrahim SA, Stone RA, Han X, Cohen P, Fine MJ, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Kwoh CK. Racial/ethnic differences in surgical outcomes in veterans following knee or hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:3143–3151.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jain NB, Guller U, Pietrobon R, Bond TK, Higgins LD. Co-morbidities increase complication rates in patients having arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;435:232–238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Barbour G, Lowry P, Irvin G, Gibbs J, Grover F, Hammermeister K, Stremple JF, et al. The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:519–531.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Demakis J, Aust JB, Chong V, Fabri PJ, Gibbs JO, Grover F, Hammermeister K, Irvin G 3rd, McDonald G, Passaro E Jr, Phillips L, Scamman F, Spencer J, Stremple JF. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228:491–507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Gibbs JO, Barbour G, Demakis J, Irvin G 3rd, Stremple JF, Grover F, McDonald G, Passaro E Jr, Fabri PJ, Spencer J, Hammermeister K, Aust JB. Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:315–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Norris TR, Iannotti JP. Functional outcome after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:130–135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilson M, Perry S, Helba H, Hintze W, Wright M, Lee K, Greenlees J, Rockwell D, Deak MA, for the US Department of Veterans Affairs. 2001 National Survey of Veterans. 2006. Available at: http://www1.va.gov/vetdata/docs/NSV%20Final%20Report.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2009.

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward V. Fehringer
    • 1
    • 4
  • Ted R. Mikuls
    • 1
  • Kaleb D. Michaud
    • 1
  • William G. Henderson
    • 2
    • 3
  • James R. O’Dell
    • 1
  1. 1.Nebraska Arthritis Outcomes Research Center (NAORC)OmahaUSA
  2. 2.University of Colorado Health Outcomes Program UCD, AMCDenverUSA
  3. 3.Denver VA Medical CenterDenverUSA
  4. 4.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and RehabilitationUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations