The Linear Cutting Stapler May Reduce Surgical Time and Blood Loss with Muscle Transection: A Pilot Study
- 153 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
Because of skeletal muscle’s density and vascularity, its transection with standard electrocautery can be tedious. In a pilot study we asked whether a linear cutting stapling device decreased surgical time, blood loss, transfusion rates, and complications in patients undergoing above-knee amputation when compared to traditional electrocautery. We retrospectively reviewed 11 patients with above-knee amputation cases using a linear cutting stapling device over a 10-year period and compared those to 13 patients in whom we used electrocautery. The patients treated with the linear cutting stapling device had an average of 97 minutes of surgical time, 302 cc blood loss, and 1.55 units transfusion, compared to an average 119 minutes, 510 cc, and 2.15 units, respectively, with the electrocautery cases. Despite the trends, these parameters, as well as major complications, were similar in these two small groups. In skeletal muscle transection, we believe the linear cutting stapler is a reasonable and potentially cost-effective technical alternative to electrocautery, possibly resulting in less blood loss and shorter surgical time with similar rates of complications.
Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Keywords
Blood Loss Transfusion Rate Anesthesia Record Phantom Limb Pain Increase Blood LossReferences
- 1.American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Advanced Trauma and Life Support for Doctors: Instructor Course Manual. 6th Ed. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 1997.Google Scholar
- 2.Civil War Battlefield Surgery: A Description of Civil War Field Surgery. Available at: http://ehistory.osu.edu/ucsw/features/medicine/cwsurgeon/amputations.cfm. Accessed July 13, 2008.
- 3.Dalstrom DJ, Venkatarayappa, I, Manternach AL, Palcic MS, Heyse BA, Prayson MJ. Time-dependant contamination of opened sterile operating-room trays. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1022–1025.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Innerhofer P, Klingler A, Klimmer C, Fries D, Nussbaumer W. Risk for postoperative infection after transfusion of white blood cell-filtered allogeneic or autologous blood components in orthopedic patients undergoing primary arthroplasty. Transfusion. 2005;45:103–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Isaacs JH. GIA stapler in radical neck dissection. Laryngoscope. 1989;99:225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Levin DA, Bendo JA, Quirno M, Errico T, Goldstein J, Spivak J. Comparative charge analysis of one and two level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion. Spine. 2007;32:2905–2909.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Malone JM. Amputations in the dysvascular patient. In: Hobson RW, Wilson SE, Veith FJ, eds. Vascular Surgery Principles and Practice. 3rd Ed. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 2004:555.Google Scholar
- 8.Netter, FH. Atlas of Human Anatomy. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis; 1989.Google Scholar
- 9.Sitges-Serra A, Insenser JJ, Membrilla E. Blood transfusions and postoperative infections in patients undergoing elective surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2006;7(Suppl 2):S33–S35.Google Scholar
- 10.Sozio, RB, Riley EJ, Shklar G. A histologic and electronic evaluation of electrosurgical currents. J Prosthet Dent. 1975;33:300–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Sozio, RB, Riley EJ, Shklar G. A controlled study of electrosurgical currents and wound healing. Oral Surgery. 1976;41:709–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Turowski GA, Koshima I, Upton J. Muscle stapling technique for free muscle transfer to the face. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:1639–1641.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Zilberberg MD, Stern LS, Wiederkehr DP, Doyle JJ, Shorr AF. Anemia, transfusions and hospital outcomes among critically ill patients on prolonged acute mechanical ventilation: a retrospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2008;12:R60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar