Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

, Volume 468, Issue 3, pp 741–746 | Cite as

Prospective Analysis of Hip Arthroscopy with 10-year Followup

Original Article


Arthroscopic surgery of the hip is a well-established technique with numerous recognized indications. Despite the well-accepted nature of this procedure, there have been no outcomes studies with extended followup. We investigated the response to hip arthroscopy in a consecutive series of patients with 10 years followup. Since 1993, all patients undergoing hip arthroscopy have been assessed prospectively with a modified Harris hip score preoperatively and then postoperatively at 3, 12, 24, 60, and 120 months. A cohort of 50 patients (52 hips) was identified who had achieved 10-year followup and represent the substance of this study. There was 100% followup. The average age of the patients was 38 years (range, 14–84 years), with 27 males and 23 females. The median improvement was 25 points (preoperative, 56 points; postoperative, 81 points). Fourteen patients were converted to THA and two died. Four patients underwent repeat arthroscopy. There were two complications in one patient. The presence of arthritis at the time of the index procedure was an indicator of poor prognosis. This study substantiates the long-term effectiveness of arthroscopy in the hip as treatment for various disorders, including labral pathology, chondral damage, synovitis, and loose bodies. Arthritis is an indicator of poor long-term outcomes with these reported methods.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


  1. 1.
    Bynum CK, Tasto J. Arthroscopic treatment of synovial disorders in the shoulder, elbow, and ankle. J Knee Surg. 2002;15:57–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Byrd JW. Hip arthroscopy utilizing the supine position. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:275–280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Byrd JW. Hip arthroscopy for post-traumatic loose fragments in the young active adult: three case reports. Clin J Sport Med. 1996;6:129–133; discussion 133–134.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Byrd JW. Hip arthroscopy: patient assessment and indications. Instr Course Lect. 2003;52:701–709.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Byrd JW. Hip arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:433–444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Byrd JW, Jones KS. Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with two year followup. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:578–587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Byrd JW, Jones KS. Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with five year followup. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(6 suppl 1):88.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Byrd JW, Pappas JN, Pedley MJ. Hip arthroscopy: an anatomic study of portal placement and relationship to the extra-articular structures. Arthroscopy. 1995;11:418–423.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Byrd JWT. Hip arthroscopy: the supine position. In: McGinty J, Caspari R, Jackson R, Poehling G, eds. Operative Arthroscopy. 2nd Ed. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1995:1091–1099.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Byrd JWT. The supine position. In: Byrd JWT, ed. Operative Hip Arthroscopy. New York, NY: Thieme; 1998:123–128.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Byrd JWT. Arthroscopy of select hip lesions. In: Byrd JWT, ed. Operative Hip Arthroscopy. New York, NY: Thieme; 1998:153–170.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Byrd JWT. Indications and contraindications. In: Byrd JWT, ed. Operative Hip Arthroscopy. New York, NY: Thieme; 1998:7–24.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dienst M, Godde S, Seil R, Hammer D, Kohn D. Hip arthroscopy without traction: in vivo anatomy of the peripheral hip joint cavity. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:924–931.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farjo LA, Glick JM, Sampson TG. Hip arthroscopy for acetabular labrum tears. Arthroscopy. 1999;15:132–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Notzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737–755.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hunter DM, Ruch DS. Hip arthroscopy. J South Orthop Assoc. 1996;5:243–250.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kelly BT, Weiland DE, Schenker ML, Philippon MJ. Arthroscopic labral repair in the hip: surgical technique and review of the literature. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1496–1504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murphy KP, Ross AE, Javernick MA, Lehman RA Jr. Repair of the adult acetabular labrum. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:567.el 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Weisleder L. Arthroscopic synovectomy of the knee: is it helpful? Arthroscopy. 1995;11:91–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Outerbridge R. Etiology of chondromalacia patella. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43:752–754.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wenger DE, Kendell KR, Miner MR, Trousdale RT. Acetabular labral tears rarely occur in the absence of bony abnormalities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:145–150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wright JG, Young NL. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:239–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nashville Sports Medicine FoundationNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations