Prognostic Factors for Survival in Patients with Epithelioid Sarcoma: 441 Cases from the SEER Database
- 270 Downloads
Current stratification of prognosis in patients with epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is based largely on data reported by individual centers with a limited number of patients. We sought to identify the important prognostic parameters using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We identified 441 patients with ES in the database and extracted information regarding patient demographics and clinical characteristics. Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and Cox regression were used for analysis. Disease-specific survival declined until 100 months after diagnosis after which survival was unrelated to epithelioid sarcoma. The overall incidence of ES during 2005 was 0.041 per 100,000. The reported incidence has increased since 1973, with an annual percentage change of 5.217%. On multivariate analysis, only age younger than 16 years, local stage of disease, or negative nodes and surgical resection of the tumor predicted better disease-specific survival. We observed no increase in survival by comparing decades of diagnosis since 1986. The SEER database shows only age younger than 16 years, negative nodes, or local stage of disease and operability of primary disease independently predict survival in patients with ES.
Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
KeywordsSentinel Node Soft Tissue Sarcoma Distant Disease Annual Percentage Change Sentinel Node Dissection
- 1.American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2003.Google Scholar
- 2.Bach PB, Guadagnoli E, Schrag D, Schussler N, Warren JL. Patient demographic and socioeconomic characteristics in the SEER-Medicare database applications and limitations. Med Care. 2002;40(8 suppl):IV-19–25.Google Scholar
- 10.Cooper GS, Virnig B, Klabunde CN, Schussler N, Freeman J, Warren JL. Use of SEER-Medicare data for measuring cancer surgery. Med Care. 2002;40(8 suppl):IV-43–48.Google Scholar
- 12.Earle CC, Nattinger AB, Potosky AL, Lang K, Mallick R, Berger M, Warren JL. Identifying cancer relapse using SEER-Medicare data. Med Care. 2002;40(8 suppl):IV-75–81.Google Scholar
- 25.International Agency for Research on Cancer. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000.Google Scholar
- 26.Lee DJ, Voti L, Mackinnon J, Koniaris LG, Fleming LE, Huang Y, Wohler B, Franceschi D, Dietz NA, Sherman R, Soler-Vila H. Gender- and race-specific comparison of tobacco-associated cancer incidence trends in Florida with SEER regional cancer incidence data. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:711–723.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.National Cancer Institute. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2005/index.html. Accessed December 1, 2008.
- 34.Potosky AL, Warren JL, Riedel ER, Klabunde CN, Earle CC, Begg CB. Measuring complications of cancer treatment using the SEER-Medicare data. Med Care. 2002;40(8 suppl):IV-62–68.Google Scholar
- 37.Schrag D, Bach PB, Dahlman C, Warren JL. Identifying and measuring hospital characteristics using the SEER-Medicare data and other claims-based sources. Med Care. 2002;40(8 suppl):IV-96–103.Google Scholar
- 40.Virnig BA, Warren JL, Cooper GS, Klabunde CN, Schussler N, Freeman J. Studying radiation therapy using SEER-Medicare-linked data. Med Care. 2002;40(8 suppl):IV-49–54.Google Scholar
- 41.Warren JL, Harlan LC, Fahey A, Virnig BA, Freeman JL, Klabunde CN, Cooper GS, Knopf KB. Utility of the SEER-Medicare data to identify chemotherapy use. Med Care. 2002;40(8 suppl):IV-55–61.Google Scholar
- 42.Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, Bach PB, Riley GF. Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care. 2002;40(8 suppl):IV-3–18.Google Scholar
- 43.Wingo PA, Jamison PM, Hiatt RA, Weir HK, Gargiullo PM, Hutton M, Lee NC, Hall HI. Building the infrastructure for nationwide cancer surveillance and control: a comparison between the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2003;14:175-193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar