Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

, Volume 467, Issue 3, pp 717–723 | Cite as

Femoroacetabular Impingement: Do Outcomes Reliably Improve with Surgical Dislocations?

Symposium: Femoroacetabular Impingement: Current Status of Diagnosis and Treatment

Abstract

Femoroacetabular impingement is a motion-based concept of conflict that occurs secondary to morphologic abnormalities of the proximal femur and/or acetabulum. Creating impingement-free motion through restoration of normal morphology serves as the goal of joint-preserving procedures. We retrospectively reviewed the short-term functional and radiographic outcomes of 46 patients (48 hips) with femoroacetabular impingement treated with a surgical dislocation and restoration of offset. The average Merle D’Aubigné-Postel score improved from a preoperative of 13 (range, 7–16 ± 1.7) to a postoperative score of 16.8 (range, 12–18 ± 1.3). Creating impingement-free motion via a surgical dislocation improves symptoms in patients with limited radiographic signs of arthritis who are experiencing impingement-related hip pain.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

References

  1. 1.
    Beaule PE, Le Duff MJ, Zaragoza E. Quality of life following femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty for femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:773–779.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beck M, Leunig M, Parvizi J, Boutier V, Wyss D, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment. Clinical Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1629–1632.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eijer H, Myers SR, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement after femoral neck fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15:475–481.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Espinosa N, Rothenfluh DA, Beck M, Ganz R, Leunig M. Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement: preliminary results of labral refixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:925–935.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, Ganz K, Krugel N, Berlemann U. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1119–1124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:264–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Notzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harris WH. Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;213:20–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ito K, Minka MA, 2nd, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:171–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lavigne M, Parvizi J, Beck M, Siebenrock KA, Ganz R, Leunig M. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part I. Techniques of joint preserving surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:61–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    MacDonald SJ, Garbuz D, Ganz R. Clinical evaluation of the symptomatic young adult hip. Semin Arthroplasty. 1997;8:3–9.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maquet GJ. Biomechanics of the Hip. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1984.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Merle D’Aubigne R, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954;36:451–475.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murphy S, Tannast M, Kim YJ, Buly R, Millis MB. Debridement of the adult hip for femoroacetabular impingement: indications and preliminary clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:178–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parvizi J, Leunig M, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:561–570.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pauwels F. Biomechanics of the Normal and Diseased Hip. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1976.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Philippon MJ, Stubbs AJ, Schenker ML, Maxwell RB, Ganz R, Leunig M. Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: osteoplasty technique and literature review. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1571–1580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pierannunzii L, d’Imporzano M. Treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a modified resection osteoplasty technique through an anterior approach. Orthopedics. 2007;30:96–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K. Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:281–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;407:241–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tönnis D, Heinecke A. Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1747–1770.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and RehabilitationUniversity of Mississippi Medical CenterJacksonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of Nevada-Reno Medical CenterRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations