Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

, Volume 467, Issue 3, pp 666–675 | Cite as

Radiographic Evaluation of the Hip has Limited Reliability

  • John C. Clohisy
  • John C. Carlisle
  • Robert Trousdale
  • Young-Jo Kim
  • Paul E. Beaule
  • Patrick Morgan
  • Karen Steger-May
  • Perry L. Schoenecker
  • Michael Millis
Symposium: Femoroacetabular Impingement: Current Status of Diagnosis and Treatment

Abstract

Radiographic evaluation provides essential information regarding the diagnosis and treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. We evaluated the ability of hip specialists to reliably identify important radiographic features and to make a diagnosis based on plain radiographs alone. Five hip specialists and one fellow performed a blinded radiographic review of 25 control hips, 25 hips with developmental dysplasia (DDH), and 27 with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). On two separate occasions, readers assessed acetabular version, inclination and depth, position of the femoral head center, head sphericity, head-neck offset, Tönnis grade, and joint congruency. Observers made a diagnosis categorizing each hip as normal, dysplastic, FAI, or combined DDH and FAI (features of both). Reliability was determined using Cohen’s kappa coefficient. Intraobserver values were highest for acetabular inclination (κ = 0.72) and determination of femoral head center position (κ = 0.77). Interobserver reliability values were highest for acetabular inclination (κ = 0.61) and Tönnis osteoarthritis grade (κ = 0.59). All other measurements, including diagnosis, had kappa values less than 0.55. We concluded many of the standard radiographic parameters used to diagnose DDH and/or FAI are not reproducible. Accordingly, a more clear set of definitions and measurements must be developed to allow for more reliable diagnosis of early hip disease.

Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic study. See the guidelines for authors for a complete description of the levels of evidence.

References

  1. 1.
    Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Matta JM. Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1704–1709.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1012–1018.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boniforti FG, Fujii G, Angliss RD, Benson MK. The reliability of measurements of pelvic radiographs in infants. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:570–575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broughton NS, Brougham DI, Cole WG, Menelaus MB. Reliability of radiological measurements in the assessment of the child’s hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71:6–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carney BT, Rogers M, Minter CL. Reliability of acetabular measures in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2005;14:73–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clohisy JC, Keeney JA, Schoenecker PL. Preliminary assessment and treatment guidelines for hip disorders in young adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:168–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clohisy JC, Nunley RM, Otto RJ, Schoenecker PL. The frog-leg lateral radiograph accurately visualized hip cam impingement abnormalities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;462:115–121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eijer H, Leunig M, Mahomed M, Ganz R. Cross table lateral radiograph for screening of anterior femoral head-neck offset in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Hip Int. 2001;11:37–41.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Notzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Palm H, Sonne-Holm S, Magnusson E. A new radiological index for assessing asphericity of the femoral head in cam impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1309–1316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Halanski MA, Noonan KJ, Hebert M, Nemeth BA, Mann DC, Leverson G. Manual versus digital radiographic measurements in acetabular dysplasia. Orthopedics. 2006;29:724–726.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harris WH. Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;213:20–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heyman CH, Herndon CH. Legg-Perthes disease; a method for the measurement of the roentgenographic result. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1950;32:767–778.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kay RM, Watts HG, Dorey FJ. Variability in the assessment of acetabular index. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17:170–173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Klaue K, Durnin CW, Ganz R. The acetabular rim syndrome. A clinical presentation of dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:423–429.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lavigne M, Parvizi J, Beck M, Siebenrock KA, Ganz R, Leunig M. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part I. Techniques of joint preserving surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:61–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lequesne M, de Seze. False profile of the pelvis. A new radiographic incidence for the study of the hip. Its use in dysplasias and different coxopathies [in French]. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1961;28:643–652.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T, Ganz R, Leunig M. Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:181–185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Millis MB, Kim YJ. Rationale of osteotomy and related procedures for hip preservation: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:108–121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Murphy SB, Ganz R, Muller ME. The prognosis in untreated dysplasia of the hip. A study of radiographic factors that predict the outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:985–989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nelitz M, Guenther KP, Gunkel S, Puhl W. Reliability of radiological measurements in the assessment of hip dysplasia in adults. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:331–334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:556–560.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Omeroglu H, Bicimoglu A, Agus H, Tumer Y. Measurement of center-edge angle in developmental dysplasia of the hip: a comparison of two methods in patients under 20 years of age. Skeletal Radiol. 2002;31:25–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peelle MW, Della Rocca GJ, Maloney WJ, Curry MC, Clohisy JC. Acetabular and femoral radiographic abnormalities associated with labral tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:327–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K. Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:281–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Spatz DK, Reiger M, Klaumann M, Miller F, Stanton RP, Lipton GE. Measurement of acetabular index intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17:174–175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA. Mean 20-year followup of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1633–1644.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Werlen S, Siebenrock KA. Femoral morphology differs between deficient and excessive acetabular coverage. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:782–790.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tannast M, Mistry S, Steppacher SD, Reichenbach S, Langlotz F, Siebenrock KA, Zheng G. Radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement with Hip2Norm-reliable and validated. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:1199–1205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C, Burckhardt K, Langlotz F, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:182–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tönnis D. Congenital Dysplasia and Dislocation of the Hip in Children and Adults. Berlin, Germany, New York, NY: Springer; 1987.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital sybluxation of the hip joint. With special reference to the complication of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scand. 1939;58:7–38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • John C. Clohisy
    • 1
  • John C. Carlisle
    • 1
  • Robert Trousdale
    • 2
  • Young-Jo Kim
    • 3
  • Paul E. Beaule
    • 4
  • Patrick Morgan
    • 5
  • Karen Steger-May
    • 6
  • Perry L. Schoenecker
    • 7
  • Michael Millis
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryWashington University School of MedicineSt LouisUSA
  2. 2.The Mayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Adolescent/Young Adult Hip Unit, Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryChildren’s Hospital BostonBostonUSA
  4. 4.Ottawa General HospitalOttawaCanada
  5. 5.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryUniversity of Minnesota Medical SchoolMinneapolisUSA
  6. 6.Division of BiostatisticsWashington University School of MedicineSt LouisUSA
  7. 7.Shriner’s Hospital for ChildrenSt LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations