Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

, Volume 467, Issue 1, pp 206–212 | Cite as

Revision of the Deficient Proximal Femur With a Proximal Femoral Allograft

  • Oleg Safir
  • Catherine F. Kellett
  • Michael Flint
  • David Backstein
  • Allan E. Gross
Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008


Substantial bone loss is frequently encountered with revision hip arthroplasty. A proximal femoral allograft may be used to reconstitute bone stock in the multiply revised femur with segmental bone loss of greater than 5 cm. We retrospectively reviewed 92 patients (93 hips) who underwent such proximal femoral allografts. The average age at the surgery was 61 years. The average number of previous revision procedures was 2.5. Six patients were lost to followup. Thirty-four of 36 deceased patients had the original proximal femoral allograft at the time of death. The minimum followup for the 50 remaining patients was 15 years (average, 16.2 years; range, 15–22 years). Analysis included survivorship and radiographic assessment. Of the 50 patients reviewed, two had a failed reconstruction due to infection, six for aseptic loosening, three for nonunion, and four for dislocation. Revision of the proximal femoral allograft for all reasons excluding the acetabulum was performed in seven patients. At last followup, 42 patients (84%) had a well-functioning construct. Proximal femoral allograft for revision hip arthroplasty in femoral segmental bone loss is a durable alternative in most patients for a complex problem.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


  1. 1.
    Alexeeff M, Mahomed N, Morsi E, Garbuz D, Gross A. Structural allograft in two-stage revisions for failed septic hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:213–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blackley HR, Davis AM, Hutchison CR, Gross AE. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip: a nine to fifteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:346–354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chandler H, Clark J, Murphy S, McCarthy J, Penenberg B, Danylchuk K, Roehr B. Reconstruction of major segmental loss of the proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;298:67–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duncan CP, Masterson EL, Masri BA. Impaction allografting with cement for the management of femoral bone loss. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:297–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fox EJ, Hau MA, Gebhardt MC, Hornicek FJ, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ. Long-term follow up of proximal femoral allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;397:106–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gerrand CH, Bell RS, Griffin AM, Wunder JS. Instability after major tumor resection: prevention and treatment. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001;32:697–710, ix-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glassman AH, Engh CA, Bobyn JD. A technique of extensile exposure for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2:11–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goodman S, Pressman A, Saastamoinen H, Gross A. Modified sliding trochanteric osteotomy in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:1039–1041.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Graham NM, Stockley I. The use of structural proximal femoral allografts in complex revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:337–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gross AE, Blackley H, Wong P, Saleh K, Woodgate I. The role of allografts in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Instr Course Lect. 2002;51:103–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gross AE, Hutchison CR. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:313–317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gross AE, Hutchison CR. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1998;21:999–1001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;141:17–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haddad FS, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Structural proximal femoral allografts for failed total hip replacements: a minimum review of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:830–836.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haddad FS, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Hutchison CR, Gross AE. Instructional course lectures, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Femoral bone loss in patients managed with revision hip replacement: results of circumferential allograft replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:420–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haddad FS, Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. Circumferential allograft replacement of the proximal femur: a critical analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:98–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Halliday BR, English HW, Timperley AJ, Gie GA, Ling RS. Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement: evolution of the technique and results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:809–817.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Head WC, Hillyard JM, Emerson RH Jr, Peters PC Jr. Proximal femoral allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 1993;4:92–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kellett CF, Boscainos PJ, Maury A, Pressman A, Cayen B, Zalzal P, Backstein D, Gross A. Proximal femoral allograft treatment of Vancouver type-B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(Suppl 2, Pt 1):68–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Langlais F, Lambotte JC, Collin P, Thomazeau H. Long-term results of allograft composite total hip prostheses for tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;414:197–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lind M, Krarup N, Mikkelsen S, Horlyck E. Exchange impaction allografting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty: results in 87 cases after 3.6 years’ follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:158–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Linder L. Cancellous impaction grafting in the human femur: histological and radiographic observations in 6 autopsy femurs and 8 biopsies. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:543–552.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Malkani AL, Sim FH, Chao EY. Custom-made segmental femoral replacement prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:727–733.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Masterson EL, Duncan CP. Subsidence and the cement mantle in femoral impaction allografting. Orthopedics. 1997;20:821–822.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meding JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Impaction bone grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1834–1841.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Morgan HD, McCallister W, Cho MS, Casnellie MT, Leopold SS. Impaction allografting for femoral component revision: clinical update. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:160–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paprosky WG, Aribindi R. Hip replacement: treatment of femoral bone loss using distal bypass fixation. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:119–130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:230–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Parvizi J, Sim FH. Proximal femoral replacements with megaprostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:169–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni A, Saleh L, Davis A, Resig S, Gross AE. Reliability and intraoperative validity of preoperative assessment of standardized plain radiographs in predicting bone loss at revision hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1040–1046.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tomford WM. Disease transmission, sterilization and the clinical use of musculoskeletal tissue allografts. In: Tomford WM, ed. Musculoskeletal Tissue Banking. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1993:209–230.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    van Biezen FC, ten Have BL, Verhaar JA. Impaction bone-grafting of severely defective femora in revision total hip surgery: 21 hips followed for 41–85 months. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:135–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zehr RJ, Enneking WF, Scarborough MT. Allograft-prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;322:207–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zmolek JC, Dorr LD. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the use of solid allograft. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:361–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oleg Safir
    • 1
  • Catherine F. Kellett
    • 2
  • Michael Flint
    • 3
  • David Backstein
    • 1
  • Allan E. Gross
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai HospitalUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryNHS TaysideDundeeScotland, UK
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Middlemore OrthopaedicsMiddlemore HospitalAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations