Femoral Morphology Due to Impingement Influences the Range of Motion in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

  • Tallal C. MamischEmail author
  • Young-Jo Kim
  • Jens A. Richolt
  • Michael B. Millis
  • Jens Kordelle
Symposium: Femoroacetabular Impingement: Current Status of Diagnosis and Treatment


Femoroacetabular impingement due to metaphyseal prominence is associated with the slippage in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), but it is unclear whether the changes in femoral metaphysis morphology are associated with range of motion (ROM) changes or type of impingement. We asked whether the femoral head-neck junction morphology influences ROM analysis and type of impingement in addition to the slip angle and the acetabular version. We analyzed in 31 patients with SCFE the relationship between the proximal femoral morphology and limitation in ROM due to impingement based on simulated ROM of preoperative CT data. The ROM was analyzed in relation to degree of slippage, femoral metaphysis morphology, acetabular version, and pathomechanical terms of “impaction” and “inclusion.” The ROM in the affected hips was comparable to that in the unaffected hips for mild slippage and decreased for slippage of more than 30°. The limitation correlated with changes in the metaphysic morphology and changed acetabular version. Decreased head-neck offset in hips with slip angles between 30° and 50° had restricted ROM to nearly the same degree as in severe SCFE. Therefore, in addition to the slip angle, the femoral metaphysis morphology should be used as criteria for reconstructive surgery.


Slip Capital Femoral Epiphysis Slip Angle Femoroacetabular Impingement Femoral Metaphysis Acetabular Cartilage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We thank Christoph Zilkens, MD and Marcel Dudda, MD for their help editing the manuscript and Carl P. Kolvenbach, MD for support in analysis of the data.


  1. 1.
    Boles CA, el-Khoury GY. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Radiographics. 1997;17:809–823.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyer DW, Mickelson MR, Ponseti IV. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: long-term follow-up study of one hundred and twenty-one patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:85–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carney BT, Weinstein SL, Noble J. Long-term follow-up of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:667–674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Debrunner HU. Orthopädisches Diagnostikum. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1973.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Futami T, Kasahara Y, Suzuki S, Seto Y, Ushikubo S. Arthroscopy for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1992;12:592–597.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gelberman RH, Cohen MS, Shaw BA, Kasser JR, Griffin PP, Wilkinson RH. The association of femoral retroversion with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:1000–1007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hansen EH. Measurement and description of joint mobility by the neutral zero method [in Danish]. Ugeskr Laeger. 1975;137:2822–2825.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ito K, Minka MA 2nd, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect: a MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:171–176.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jones JR, Paterson DC, Hillier TM, Foster BK. Remodelling after pinning for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:568–573.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Key J. Epiphyseal coxa vara or displacement of the epiphysis of the femur in adolescence. J Bone Joint Surg. 1926;8:53–57.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kordelle J, Richolt JA, Millis M, Jolesz FA, Kikinis R. Development of the acetabulum in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a three-dimensional analysis based on computed tomography. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21:174–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leunig M, Casillas MM, Hamlet M, Hersche O, Notzli H, Slongo T, Ganz R. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: early mechanical damage to the acetabular cartilage by a prominent femoral metaphysis. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:370–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moreau MJ. Remodelling in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Can J Surg. 1987;30:440–442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murray RO. The aetiology of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. Br J Radiol. 1965;38:810–824.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ozonoff MB. The hip. In: Bralow L, ed. Pediatric Orthopedic Radiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1992:293–300.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rab GT. The geometry of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: implications for movement, impingement, and corrective osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop. 1999;19:419–424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Richolt JA, Teschner M, Everett PC, Millis MB, Kikinis R. Impingement simulation of the hip in SCFE using 3D models. Comput Aided Surg. 1999;4:144–151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schai PA, Exner GU, Hansch O. Prevention of secondary coxarthrosis in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a long-term follow-up study after corrective intertrochanteric osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996;5:135–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Southwick WO. Osteotomy through the lesser trochanter for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967;49:807–835.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stanitski CL, Woo R, Stanitski DF. Femoral version in acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996;5:74–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilson PD, Jacobs B, Schecter L. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an end-result study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1965;47:1128–1145.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tallal C. Mamisch
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Young-Jo Kim
    • 3
  • Jens A. Richolt
    • 2
    • 4
  • Michael B. Millis
    • 3
  • Jens Kordelle
    • 2
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital University BernBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.Surgical Planning Laboratory, Brigham and Women’s HospitalHarvard Medical School, RadiologyBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Children’s HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity FrankfurtFrankfurt am MainGermany
  5. 5.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryUniversity GiessenGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations