Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings 2008
Fifty years have passed since the first total hip arthroplasty of the modern era was performed. At this, the vantage point, it is reasonable to review these five decades, inquiring behind the single dominating observation that, in its current form, this operation is one of the most successful of all surgical procedures for the management of end-stage human disease. What are the generic lessons that can be derived from the experience? Succinctly, five major observations appear valuable. They are “skunk works,” “Pasteur’s motto,” “the totally unexpected,” “research solutions,” and “the role of alternatives.” “Skunk works,” an industrial management term, might be characterized as an innovative endeavor that is offline and off-budget resulting from the relentless pursuit of a vivid dream by creative zealots who eschew defeat. Pasteur’s motto dealt with serendipity, which was crucial to total hip arthroplasty progress. The totally unexpected is represented by an entirely new manmade disease, “periprosthetic osteolysis.” The research solutions are represented by the complex, sophisticated contemporary research that has unraveled periprosthetic osteolysis and suggested modes of correction. Finally, the application of “alternatives” has characterized major progress. Importantly, these, or similar generic observations, may provide insights into important progress in the future.
Femoral Component UHMWPE Massive Bone Loss Periprosthetic Osteolysis Alternate Bearing
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Bragdon CR, Kwon YM, Geller JA, Greene ME, Freiberg AA, Harris WH, Malchau H. Minimum 6-year followup of highly crosslinked polyethylene in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:122–127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Burroughs BR, Rubash HE, Harris WH. Femoral head sizes larger than 32 mm against highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:150–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnley J. The Man and the Hip. New York, NY: Springer; 1990:120–143.Google Scholar
Coventry MB, Nolan DR, Beckenbaugh RD. ‘Delayed’ prophylactic anticoagulation: a study of results and complications in 2,012 total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1487–1497.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Crawford WJ, Hillman F, Charnley J. A clinical trial of prophylactic anticoagulant therapy in elective hip surgery. In: Internal Publication 14. Wiggan, UK: Centre for Hip Surgery, Wrightington Hospital; 1968.Google Scholar
Galante J, Rostoker W, Lueck R, Ray RD. Sintered fiber metal composites as a basis for attachment of implants to bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53:101–114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hamadouche M, Boutin P, Daussange J, Bolander ME, Sedel L. Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:69–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Harris WH, Schiller AL, Scholler JM, Freiberg RA, Scott R. Extensive localized bone resorption in the femur following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:612–618.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Jacobs JJ, Roebuck KA, Archibeck M, Hallab NJ, Glant TT. Osteolysis: basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:71–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasty M, Goetz DD, Bragdon CR, Lee KR, Hanson AE, Elder JR, Harris WH. Wear of polyethylene acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of one hundred and twenty-eight components retrieved at autopsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:349–358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabo JM, Gebhard JS, Loren G, Amstutz HC. In vivo wear of polyethylene acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:254–258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Maloney WJ, Herzwurm P, Paprosky W, Rubash HE, Engh CE. Treatment of pelvic osteolysis association with a stable acetabular component inserted without cement as part of a total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1628–1634.PubMedGoogle Scholar
McKellop H, Shen FW, Lu B, Campbell P, Salovey R. Development of an extremely wear-resistant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene for total hip replacements. J Orthop Res. 1999;17:157–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, O’Connor DO, Jasty M, Harris WH. A novel method of cross-linking ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene to improve wear, reduce oxidation, and retain mechanical properties. Recipient of the HAP Paul Award. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:149–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehme A, Lewallen D, Hanssen AD. Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty. Clin OrthopRelat Res. 2004;429:201–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oral E, Christensen SD, Malhi AS, Wannomae KK, Muratoglu OK. Wear resistance and mechanical properties of highly crosslinked UHMWPE doped with vitamin E. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:58–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oral E, Wannomae KK, Hawkins N, Harris WH, Muratoglu OK. α-Tocopherol-doped irradiated UHMWPE for high fatigue resistance and low wear. Biomaterials. 2004;25:5515–5522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreurs BW, Bolder SBT, Gardeniers JMW, Verdonschot N, Sloof TJJH, Veth RPH. Acetabular revision with impacted morcellized cancellous bone grafting and a cemented cup. A fifteen to twenty year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:492–497.PubMedGoogle Scholar