Unicameral Bone Cyst: A Retrospective Study of Three Surgical Treatments
- 313 Downloads
Between 1979 and 2004, 167 patients younger than 20 years were treated surgically for humeral or femoral unicameral bone cysts with either injection of corticosteroids (steroids), curettage plus bone grafting (curettage), or a combination injection of steroids, demineralized bone matrix, and bone marrow aspirate (SDB) at Children’s Hospital of Boston and Massachusetts General Hospital (mean followup, 7.3 years; range, 1 month–27 years). Outcomes included treatment failure (defined clinically as subsequent pathologic fracture or need for retreatment to prevent pathologic fracture) and complications. Information was obtained from medical records and by telephone questionnaire. After one treatment, 84% of cysts treated with steroids experienced failed treatment versus 64% with curettage and 50% with SDB. For unicameral bone cysts requiring retreatment (regardless of first treatment), 76% retreated with steroids had failed treatment versus 63% with curettage and 71% with SDB. Curettage was associated with the lowest rate of posttreatment pathologic fractures and highest rate of pain and other complications. Multivariate logistic regression indicated treatment with steroids alone and younger age were independent predictors of failure. We believe SDB is a reasonable first treatment for unicameral bone cysts in the humerus and femur in patients younger than 20 years, being less invasive yet comparable to curettage in preventing recurrence.
Level of Evidence: Level IV, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
We thank Kevin A. Raskin, MD, and Henry J. Mankin, MD, for valuable help and assistance.
- 2.Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1991:371–384.Google Scholar
- 16.Harris EK, Albert A. Survivorship Analysis for Clinical Studies. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1991:29–49.Google Scholar
- 17.Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 2000:11–64.Google Scholar
- 18.Jaffe HL, Lichtenstein L. Solitary unicameral bone cyst: with emphasis on the roentgen picture, the pathologic appearance and the diagnosis. Arch Surg. 1942;4:1004–1025.Google Scholar
- 20.Katz MH. Multivariable Analysis: A Practical Guide for Clinicians. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2006:96–136.Google Scholar
- 24.Mackley JT, Joyce MJ. Unicameral bone cyst (simple bone cyst). Orthop Clin North Am. 1989;20(3):407–415.Google Scholar
- 26.Mirra JM, Bernard GW, Bullough PG, Johnston W, Mink G. Cementum-like bone production in solitary bone cysts (so-called “cementoma” of long bones): report of three cases. Electron microscopic observations supporting a synovial origin to the simple bone cyst. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;135:295–307.Google Scholar
- 28.Neer CS 2nd, Francis KC, Marcove RC, Terz J, Carbonara PN. Treatment of unicameral bone cyst: a follow-up study of one hundred seventy-five cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966;48:731–745.Google Scholar
- 40.Virchow R. Uber die Bildung von Knochencysten. Monatsberichte der Koniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschafen. 1876;Suppl:369–381.Google Scholar