Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

, Volume 466, Issue 10, pp 2513–2518 | Cite as

Systematic Review of Cemented and Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty Outcomes for Femoral Neck Fractures

  • Jaimo AhnEmail author
  • Li-Xing Man
  • SangDo Park
  • Jeffrey F. Sodl
  • John L. Esterhai
Original Article


Although hemiarthroplasties are an important treatment for femoral neck fractures, the literature does not provide a clear approach for selecting the implant fixation method. Therefore, we performed a systematic search of the medical literature and identified 11 prospective and retrospective studies that compared results between cemented and uncemented femoral implant fixation methods. After independent blind data extraction, we compared variables between cemented and uncemented cohorts using two different meta-analysis models. Pooled data represented 1632 cemented and 981 uncemented hemiarthroplasties (average age of patients, 78.9 and 77.5 years, respectively). The average operating room times and blood loss volumes were 95 minutes and 467 mL, respectively, for the cemented and 80 minutes and 338 mL for the uncemented cohorts. Postoperative mortality rates, overall complications, and pain were similar between the two cohorts. Despite a few potential trends, we found few statistical differences between cemented and uncemented techniques based on reported outcome measurements. In addition, inspection of this literature underscored the lack of and need for consistent and standardized reporting of outcome variables regarding these procedures.

Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Heterotopic Ossification Femoral Neck Fracture Pertrochanteric Fracture Femoral Head Fracture Uncemented Cohort 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

11999_2008_368_MOESM1_ESM.xls (16 kb)
ESM 1 (XLS 15 kb)
11999_2008_368_MOESM2_ESM.xls (29 kb)
ESM 2 (XLS 29 kb)


  1. 1.
    Baker RP, Squires B, Gargan MF, Bannister GC. Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck: a randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2583–2589.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P 3rd, Obremskey W, Koval KJ, Nork S, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH, Guyatt GH. Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1673–1681.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Fatalities and injuries from falls among older adults—United States, 1993–2003 and 2001–2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55:1221–1224.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dorr LD, Glousman R, Hoy AL, Vanis R, Chandler R. Treatment of femoral neck fractures with total hip replacement versus cemented and noncemented hemiarthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1986;1:21–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, eds. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in Context. London, England: BMJ; 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eiskjaer S, Gelineck J, Soballe K. Fractures of the femoral neck treated with cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1989;12:1545–1550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Emery RJ, Broughton NS, Desai K, Bulstrode CJ, Thomas TL. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for subcapital fracture of the femoral neck: a prospective randomised trial of cemented Thompson and uncemented Moore stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:322–324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foster AP, Thompson NW, Wong J, Charlwood AP. Periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparison between cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasties. Injury. 2005;36:424–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gebhard JS, Amstutz HC, Zinar DM, Dorey FJ. A comparison of total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for treatment of acute fracture of the femoral neck. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;282:123–131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gillespie WJ. Extracts from ‘clinical evidence’: hip fracture. BMJ. 2001;322:968–975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holt EM, Evans RA, Hindley CJ, Metcalfe JW. 1000 femoral neck fractures: the effect of pre-injury mobility and surgical experience on outcome. Injury. 1994;25:91–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keating JF, Grant A, Masson M, Scott NW, Forbes JF. Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty: treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:249–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khan RJ, MacDowell A, Crossman P, Datta A, Jallali N, Arch BN, Keene GS. Cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Int Orthop. 2002;26:229–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khan RJ, MacDowell A, Crossman P, Keene GS. Cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip: a systematic review. Injury. 2002;33:13–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lausten GS, Vedel P, Nielsen PM. Fractures of the femoral neck treated with a bipolar endoprosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;218:63–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lennox IA, McLauchlan J. Comparing the mortality and morbidity of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasties. Injury. 1993;24:185–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lo WH, Chen WM, Huang CK, Chen TH, Chiu FY, Chen CM. Bateman bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures: uncemented versus cemented. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;302:75–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moja LP, Telaro E, D’Amico R, Moschetti I, Coe L, Liberati A. Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study. BMJ. 2005;330:1053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parker MJ, Gurusamy K. Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD001706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sikorski JM, Barrington R. Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for the displaced subcapital fracture of the femur: a prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63:357–361.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sonne-Holm S, Walter S, Jensen JS. Moore hemi-arthroplasty with and without bone cement in femoral neck fractures: a clinical controlled trial. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53:953–956.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaimo Ahn
    • 1
    Email author
  • Li-Xing Man
    • 2
  • SangDo Park
    • 1
  • Jeffrey F. Sodl
    • 3
  • John L. Esterhai
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryThe University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of OtolaryngologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of Southern California HospitalLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations