The extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) is widely used for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). We describe a novel technique to reattach the extended trochanteric osteotomy using a suture cord. We retrospectively reviewed 20 patients who underwent revision by this technique with a minimum followup of 2 years (mean, 2.2 years; range, 2–4 years). Bony union of the osteotomy occurred in 19 patients and fibrous union in one patient who remained asymptomatic. We observed proximal migration of the osteotomy fragment in one patient (5 mm) who had bony union of the osteotomy. This technique of anchoring the osteotomy fragment directly onto the prosthetic stem using a suture cord provides a secure fixation and does not endanger the blood supply of the osteotomy. It also has the advantage of avoiding the morbidity associated with cerclage wires and the costs associated with cabling systems.
Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Aseptic Loosening Bony Union Breaking Strength Cerclage Wire Proximal Migration
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Chen W, McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH, Engh CA. Extended slide trochanteric osteotomy for revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1215–1219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG. Classification and algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(suppl 4):1–6.Google Scholar
Landsmeer R, Khanduja V, New A, Suresh SP, Shah K, Loeffler M. Making strong cords from surgical sutures. Acta Orthop Belg. 2006;72:210–213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Mardones R, Gonzalez C, Cabanela ME, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Extended femoral osteotomy for revision of hip arthroplasty: results and complications. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:79–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy JC, Bono JV, Turner RH, Kremchek T, Lee J. The outcome of trochanteric reattachment in revision total hip arthroplasty with a Cable Grip System mean 6-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:810–814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald SJ, Cole C, Guerin J, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, McCalden RW. Extended trochanteric osteotomy via the direct lateral approach in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:210–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Miner TM, Momberger NG, Chong D, Paprosky WL. The extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a clinical review of 166 cases at mean 3-year, 9-month follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(8 suppl 1):188–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najima H, Gagey O, Cottias P, Huten D. Blood supply of the greater trochanter after trochanterotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;349:235–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paprosky WG, Weeden SH, Bowling JW Jr. Component removal in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:181–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutzer SF, Harris WH. Trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip arthroplasty: 97% union rate using a comprehensive approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;227:172–183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Wagner H. Revision prosthesis for the hip joint in severe bone loss [in German]. Orthopade. 1987;16:295–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Younger TI, Bradford MS, Magnus RE, Paprosky WG. Extended proximal femoral osteotomy: a new technique for femoral revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:329–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar