Advertisement

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

, Volume 466, Issue 2, pp 353–358 | Cite as

Retroacetabular Stress-shielding in THA

  • Rocco P. PittoEmail author
  • Akanksha Bhargava
  • Salil Pandit
  • Jacob T. Munro
International Hip Society Symposium

Abstract

We conducted a randomized clinical trial to compare periacetabular bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty using press-fit components with soft and hard liner materials. Bone density changes were assessed using quantitative computed tomography-assisted osteodensitometry. Twenty press-fit cups with alumina ceramic liners and 20 press-fit cups with highly cross-linked polyethylene liners were included; the nonoperated contralateral side was used as the control. Computed tomography scans were performed postoperatively and 1 year after the index operation. At the 1-year followup, we found no differences of periacetabular bone density changes between the alumina and polyethylene liner cohorts. However, we observed marked periacetabular cancellous bone density loss (up to −34%) in both cohorts. In contrast, we observed only moderate cortical bone density changes. The decrease of periacetabular cancellous bone density with retention of cortical bone density after THA suggests stress transfer to the cortical bone.

Keywords

Bone Density Cancellous Bone Acetabular Component Bone Remodel Process Cortical Bone Density 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Garnet Tregonning, Dr. Lyndon Bradley, Dr. Godwyn Choy, Dr. Keryn Reilly, and Dr. Melissa Rossaak for their assistance during the clinical followups. We express our gratitude to Cameron Walker, PhD, for statistical analysis of this study. We also thank Dr. Lutz Mueller and Dr. Rainer Schmidt for advice in implementing quantitative computed tomography research at the University of Auckland.

References

  1. 1.
    Bloebaum RD, Liau DW, Lester DK, Rosenbaum TG. Ambulatory activities maintain cortical bone after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;450:129–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Digas G, Karrholm J, Thanner J. Different loss of BMD using uncemented press-fit and whole polyethylene cups fixed with cement: repeated DXA studies in 96 hips randomized to 3 types of fixation. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:218–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Engh CA Jr, McAuley J, Sychterz CJ, Sacco ME, Engh CA Sr. The accuracy and reproducibility of radiographic assessment of stress-shielding. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1414–1420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hendrich C, Kaddich C, Pfaff HG, Willmann G. Do ceramic liners alter the load transmission of modular hip sockets? In: Willmann G, Zweymuller K, eds. Bioceramics in Hip Joint Replacement: Proceedings of the 5th Ceram Tec Symposium 2000. Stuttgart, Germany/New York, NY: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2000:54–63.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huiskes R. Finite element analysis of acetabular reconstruction. Noncemented threaded cups. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;58:620–625.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huiskes R, Weinans H, Dalstra M. Adaptive bone remodeling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1989;12:1255–1267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH, Harris WH, Poss R, Mueller ME, Sledge CB. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:161–168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kalender WA. A phantom for standardization, quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by QCT and DXA: design considerations and specifications. Med Phys. 1992;19:583–586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kalender WA. Effective dose values in bone mineral measurements by photon absorptiometry and computed tomography. Osteoporosis Int. 1992;2:82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mirsky EC, Einhorn TA. Bone densitometry in orthopaedic practice. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1687–1698.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moore MS, McAuley JP, Young AM, Engh CA Sr. Radiographic signs of osseointegration in porous-coated acetabular components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;444:176–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mueller LA, Kress A, Nowak T, Pfander D, Pitto RP, Forst R, Schmidt R. Periacetabular bone changes after uncemented total hip arthroplasty evaluated by quantitative computed tomography. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:380–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mueller LA, Voelk M, Kress A, Pitto RP, Schmidt R. Progressive loss of bone density after alumina-alumina total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pedersen DR, Crowninshield RD, Brand RA, Johnston RC. An axisymmetric model of acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. J Biomechanics. 1982;15:305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pitto RP, Mueller L, Reilly K, Schmidt R, Munro J. Quantitative computer assisted osteodensitometry in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2007;31:431–438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schmidt R, Muller L, Kress A, Hirschfelder H, Aplas A, Pitto RP. A computed tomography assessment of femoral and acetabular bone changes after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2002;26:299–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schmidt R, Pitto RP, Kress A, Ehremann C, Nowak TE, Reulbach U, Forst R, Muller L. Inter- and intraobserver assessment of periacetabular osteodensitometry after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125:291–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schmidt R, Willmann G, Pitto RP. Uncemented acetabular components with polyethylene and alumina liners. Int Orthop. 2003;27:85–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shim V, Pitto RP, Streicher RM, Hunter PJ, Anderson IA. The use of sparse CT datasets for auto-generating FE models of the femur and pelvis. J Biomech. 2007;40:26–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini PS. Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:457–467.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Viceconti M, Davinelli M, Taddei F, Cappello A. Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies. J Biomech. 2004;37:1597–1605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wilkinson JM, Peel NFA, Elson RA, Stockley I, Eastell R. Measuring bone mineral density of the pelvis and proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:283–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wright JM, Pellicci PM, Salvati EA, Ghelman B, Roberts MM, Koh JL. Bone density adjacent to press-fit acetabular components: a prospective analysis with quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:529–536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rocco P. Pitto
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Akanksha Bhargava
    • 1
  • Salil Pandit
    • 1
  • Jacob T. Munro
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Middlemore HospitalSouth Auckland Clinical School, University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Bioengineering InstituteUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations