Initiated chemical vapor deposition of poly(hexafluorobutyl acrylate) thin films for superhydrophobic surface modification of nanostructured textile surfaces

  • Büşra Şimşek
  • Mustafa KaramanEmail author


This study demonstrates the synthesis of poly(hexafluorobutyl acrylate) (PHFBA) thin films on textile substrates using initiated chemical vapor deposition (iCVD) method. Owing to its short perfluoroalkyl functional group, PHFBA is a suitable low-surface-energy finish that can be used for hydrophobic functionalization of textile surfaces. During iCVD of PHFBA, the use of initiator helped to achieve deposition rates up to 83 nm/min, which is nearly twice that achieved by PECVD. FTIR and XPS analyses of as-deposited films showed very high retention of carbonyl and perfluoroalkyl functionalities. Polyester and cotton fabrics were made superhydrophobic after conformal coating of PHFBA by iCVD. The decoration of fabric surfaces by SiO2 nanoparticles prior to the iCVD coating helped to create composite structures having dual-scale roughness. The final SiO2-treated and iCVD-PHFBA-coated textile fabrics showed very high water contact angles (> 165°).


Hexafluorobutyl acrylate iCVD Superhydrophobic surfaces Textile surface modification 


Supplementary material

11998_2019_282_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1139 kb)
11998_2019_282_MOESM2_ESM.mp4 (461 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (MP4 460 kb)
11998_2019_282_MOESM3_ESM.mp4 (1.4 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (MP4 1405 kb)


  1. 1.
    Song, J, Rojas, OJ, “Approaching Super-Hydrophobicity from Cellulosic Materials: A Review.” Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J, 28 216–238 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang, M, et al., “Preparation and Characterization of Cotton Fabric with Potential Use in UV Resistance and Oil Reclaim.” Carbohydr. Polym., 137 264–270 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Manakasettharn, S, Taylor, J, Krupenkin, T, “Superhydrophobicity at Micron and Submicron Scale.” In: Andrews, D, Scholes, G, Wiederrecht, G (eds.) Comprehensive Nanoscience and Technology, Vol. 4, pp. 383–411 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bahners, T, Textor, T, Opwis, K, Schollmeyer, E, “Recent Approaches to Highly Hydrophobic Textile Surfaces.” J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 22 285–309 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoefnagels, H, Wu, D, De With, G, Ming, W, “Biomimetic Superhydrophobic and Highly Oleophobic Cotton Textiles.” Langmuir, 23 13158–13163 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang, M, Wang, C, “Fabrication of Cotton Fabric with Superhydrophobicity and Flame Retardancy.” Carbohydr. Polym., 96 396–402 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu, L, Zhuang, W, Xu, B, Cai, Z, “Superhydrophobic Cotton Fabrics Prepared by One-Step Water-Based Sol–Gel Coating.” J. Text. Inst., 103 311–319 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bose, RK, Heming, AM, Lau, KK, “Microencapsulation of a Crop Protection Compound by Initiated Chemical Vapor Deposition.” Macromol. Rapid Commun., 33 1375–1380 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Breme, F, Buttstaedt, J, Emig, G, “Coating of Polymers with Titanium-Based Layers by a Novel Plasma-Assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition Process.” Thin Solid Films, 377 755–759 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gürsoy, M, Karaman, M, “Hydrophobic Coating of Expanded Perlite Particles by Plasma Polymerization.” Chem. Eng. J., 284 343–350 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karaman, M, Çabuk, N, Özyurt, D, Köysüren, Ö, “Self-Supporting Superhydrophobic Thin Polymer Sheets that Mimic the Nature’s Petal Effect.” Appl. Surf. Sci., 259 542–546 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bakker, R, et al., “Heat Transfer Model of an iCVD Reactor.” Thin Solid Films, 517 3555–3558 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Trujillo, NJ, Baxamusa, S, Gleason, KK, “Grafted Polymeric Nanostructures Patterned Bottom–Up by Colloidal Lithography and Initiated Chemical Vapor Deposition (iCVD).” Thin Solid Films, 517 3615–3618 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rezaei, S, Manoucheri, I, Moradian, R, Pourabbas, B, “One-Step Chemical Vapor Deposition and Modification of Silica Nanoparticles at the Lowest Possible Temperature and Superhydrophobic Surface Fabrication.” Chem. Eng. J., 252 11–16 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ma, M, Mao, Y, Gupta, M, Gleason, KK, Rutledge, GC, “Superhydrophobic Fabrics Produced by Electrospinning and Chemical Vapor Deposition.” Macromolecules, 38 9742–9748 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yu, M, Gu, G, Meng, W-D, Qing, F-L, “Superhydrophobic Cotton Fabric Coating Based on a Complex Layer of Silica Nanoparticles and Perfluorooctylated Quaternary Ammonium Silane Coupling Agent.” Appl. Surf. Sci., 253 3669–3673 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Graham, P, Stone, M, Thorpe, A, Nevell, TG, Tsibouklis, J, “Fluoropolymers with Very Low Surface Energy Characteristics.” J. Fluor. Chem., 104 29–36 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Di Mundo, R, Bottiglione, F, Palumbo, F, Notarnicola, M, Carbone, G, “Filamentary Superhydrophobic Teflon Surfaces: Moderate Apparent Contact Angle but Superior Air-Retaining Properties.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 482 175–182 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blum, A, et al., “The Madrid Statement on Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs).” Environ. Health Perspect., 123 A107–A111 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bowman, JS, “Fluorotechnology is Critical to Modern Life: The FluoroCouncil Counterpoint to the Madrid Statement.” Environ. Health Perspect., 123 A112–A113 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Soto, D, Ugur, A, Farnham, TA, Gleason, KK, Varanasi, KK, “Short-Fluorinated iCVD Coatings for Nonwetting Fabrics.” Adv. Funct. Mater., 28 1707355 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karaman, M, Yenice, E, “Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition of Poly(2,2,3,4,4,4-hexafluorobutyl acrylate) Thin Films.” Chem. Vap. Depos., 21 188–195 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stöber, W, Fink, A, Bohn, E, “Controlled Growth of Monodisperse Silica Spheres in the Micron Size Range.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 26 62–69 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hejda, F, Solar, P, Kousal, J, “Surface Free Energy Determination by Contact Angle Measurements—A Comparison of Various Approaches.” WDS, 25–30 (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Asatekin, A, et al., “Designing Polymer Surfaces via Vapor Deposition.” Mater. Today, 13 26–33 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gürsoy, M, Karaman, M, Surface Treatments for Biological, Chemical and Physical Applications. Wiley, New York (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lau, KK, Gleason, KK, “Initiated Chemical Vapor Deposition (iCVD) of Poly(alkyl acrylates): An Experimental Study.” Macromolecules, 39 3688–3694 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yu, M, et al., “Positive Effect of Polymeric Silane-Based Water Repellent Agents on the Durability of Superhydrophobic Fabrics.” Appl. Surf. Sci., 450 492–501 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhou, H, et al., “Fluoroalkyl Silane Modified Silicone Rubber/Nanoparticle Composite: A Super Durable, Robust Superhydrophobic Fabric Coating.” Adv. Mater., 24 2409–2412 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hamadi, F, Latrache, H, Zekraoui, M, Ellouali, M, Bengourram, J, “Effect of pH on Surface Energy of Glass and Teflon and Theoretical Prediction of Staphylococcus aureus Adhesion.” Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 29 1302–1305 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Coatings Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanotechnology and Advanced MaterialsSelcuk UniversityKonyaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringKonya Technical UniversityKonyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations