Advertisement

Journal of Coatings Technology and Research

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 69–79 | Cite as

Wet clay adhesion to antistick coatings: effects of binder type and surface roughness

  • Andrea Fasano
  • Liliana Madaleno
  • Svava Davidsdottir
  • Lars S. Jensen
  • Josep Palasi
  • Claus E. Weinell
  • Kim Dam-Johansen
  • Søren KiilEmail author
Article
  • 131 Downloads

Abstract

The handling of sticky raw material can cause problems during operation of process equipment in the cement production industry. These handling problems are generally observed when raw material (e.g., wet clay) sticks to machine walls and causes blockage of outlets. This leads to frequent production shutdowns and expensive cleaning operations. In this work, the effects of surface material and process parameters on the friction forces between wet clay and surface were investigated. Various surface materials and clay impact speeds were investigated. The results demonstrate that not only the equipment surface material but also the surface roughness influences the observed frictional behavior. The ranking of the materials in terms of effective static friction coefficients fell in two groups with equal performance within the group: (1) Two Teflon-based coatings (Accofal 2G54 and Accolan LB), polished AISI 304 stainless steel, Matrox lining, and a polyurethane-based coating (best performing surfaces), (2) Mild steel, a silicone-based coating, and AISI 304 stainless steel (worst performing surfaces). However, the friction coefficients of the two groups only varied by a factor of two, suggesting that adhesion of wet clay to surfaces is difficult to avoid by the use of coatings.

Keywords

Antistick coatings Steel Friction measurements Wet clay Cement industry 

List of symbols

F

Force (N)

g

Gravitational acceleration (m/s2)

m

Mass of clay lump (g)

N

Normal force (N)

DFT

Dry film thickness (m)

r

Radial position (m)

Ra

Arithmetic average roughness (m)

t

Time (s)

v

Impact velocity of clay lump (m/s)

XRD

X-ray diffraction

Greek

α

Constant angular acceleration (s−1)

ω

Angular velocity (s−1)

µs,eff

Effective static friction coefficient (dimensionless)

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Johan Scholl for his help with the contact angle measurements, Jakob Eltzholtz, for the ICP and XRF analyses of Slantzy Clay, and Kasper Skov Mørk and Ion Marius Sivebæk for discussions on the setup design and implementation. This work was part of the research platform ‘Minerals and Cement Process Technology – MiCeTech’ funded by Innovation Fund Denmark, FLSmidth A/S, Hempel A/S, The Hempel Foundation, and The Technical University of Denmark. The research was conducted at the Center for Coatings Science and Technology (CoaST) at DTU.

References

  1. 1.
    Fountaine, ER, “Investigations into the Mechanism of Soil Adhesion.” J. Soil Sci., 5 251–263 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mitarai, N, Nori, F, “Wet Granular Materials.” Adv. Phys., 55 1–45 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kooistra, A, Verhoef, PNW, Broere, W, Ngan-Tillard, DJM, van Tol, AF “Appraisal of stickiness of natural clays from laboratory tests.” Proceedings of the National Symposium of Engineering Geology and Infrastructure, pp. 101–113, Delft, Netherlands (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feligha, M, Hammoud, F, Belachia, M, Nouaouria, MS, “Experimental Investigation of Frictional Behavior Between Cohesive Soils and Solid Materials Using Direct Shear Apparatus.” Geotech. Geol. Eng., 34 567–578 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Littleton, I, “An Experimental Study of the Adhesion between Clay and Steel.” J. Terramech., 13 141–152 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tsubakihara, Y, Kishida, H, Nishiyama, T, “Friction Between Cohesive Soils and Steel.” Soils Found., 33 145–156 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zimnik, AR, van Baalen, LR, Verhoef, PNW, Ngan-Tillard, DJM “The Adherence of Clay to Steel Surfaces.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, pp. 1–6, Melbourne, Australia (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zumsteg, R, Puzrin, AM, “Stickiness and Adhesion of Conditioned Clay Pastes.” Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 31 86–96 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Popov, VL, Contact Mechanics and Friction, 1st ed. Springer, Berlin (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rabinowicz, E, Friction and Wear of Materials, 2nd ed. Wiley, Hoboken (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Svendsen, JR, Kontogeorgis, G, Kiil, S, Weinell, CE, Grønlund, M, “Adhesion Between Coating Layers Based on Epoxy and Silicone.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 316 678–686 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Coatings Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CoaST, Department of Chemical and Biochemical EngineeringTechnical University of Denmark, DTUKgs. LyngbyDenmark
  2. 2.Hempel A/SKgs. LyngbyDenmark
  3. 3.FLSmidth A/SValbyDenmark
  4. 4.Hempel A/SPolinyaSpain

Personalised recommendations