Advertisement

Journal of Coatings Technology and Research

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 25–30 | Cite as

Cu2O-clay composites with sub-micrometer-sized Cu2O particles for marine antifouling paints

  • Pengchong Li
  • Chao Cai
  • Yuhua Long
  • Tang Zhu
  • Haixia Dong
  • Caizhen ZhuEmail author
  • Ning ZhaoEmail author
  • Jian XuEmail author
Article
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

Microsized Cu2O particles are widely used in tin-free marine antifouling (AF) paints. Because of the enlarged specific surface area, utilization of Cu2O particles with smaller sizes is a potential way to improve the AF efficiency and lower the Cu2O content. In this paper, the clay, commonly applied as filler in the paint, was previously used to control the concentration of free Cu2+ during the synthesis of Cu2O. With the help of clay, the size of obtained Cu2O particles decreased from 750 to 460 nm. It has been shown that the smaller-sized Cu2O can work against the marine biofouling with a lower content (15 wt%) compared to the commercial microsized Cu2O (40 wt%) in the 260 days of marine AF field tests.

Keywords

Antifouling Clay Cu2Field test Particle size 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology (2013AA031802) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21421061, 21474117). The authors also thank Ningbo Haiteng New Materials Co., Ltd. for the supports in AF field tests.

References

  1. 1.
    Liu, L, Yang, W, Li, Q, Gao, S, Shang, JK, “Synthesis of Cu2O Nanospheres Decorated with TiO2 Nanoislands, Their Enhanced Photoactivity and Stability under Visible Light Illumination, and Their Post-illumination Catalytic Memory.” ACS Appl. Mater. & Interfaces, 6 (8) 5629–5639 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang, J, Ma, J, Li, X, Li, Y, Zhang, G, Zhang, F, Fan, X, “Cu2O Mesoporous Spheres with a High Internal Diffusion Capacity and Improved Catalytic Ability for the Aza-Henry Reaction Driven by Visible Light.” Chem. Commun., 50 (91) 14237–14240 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xu, J, Tang, Y-B, Zhang, W, Lee, C-S, Yang, Z, Lee, S-T, “Fabrication of Architectures with Dual Hollow Structures: Arrays of Cu2O Nanotubes Organized by Hollow Nanospheres.” Cryst. Growth Des., 9 (10) 4524–4528 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuo, CH, Chen, CH, Huang, MH, “Seed-Mediated Synthesis of Monodispersed Cu2O Nanocubes with Five Different Size Ranges from 40 to 420 nm.” Adv. Funct. Mater., 17 (18) 3773–3780 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang, H, Liu, Z-H, “Facile Synthesis, Shape Evolution, and Photocatalytic Activity of Truncated Cuprous Oxide Octahedron Microcrystals with Hollows.” Cryst. Growth Des., 10 (5) 2064–2067 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, W, Fan, Z, Lai, Z, “Synthesis of Core-Shell Heterostructured Cu/Cu2O Nanowires Monitored by In Situ XRD as Efficient Visible-Light Photocatalysts.” J. Mater. Chem. A, 1 (44) 13862–13868 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, H, Liu, R, Liu, Y, Huang, H, Yu, H, Ming, H, Lian, S, Lee, S-T, Kang, Z, “Carbon Quantum Dots/Cu2O Composites with Protruding Nanostructures and Their Highly Efficient (Near) Infrared Photocatalytic Behavior.” J. Mater. Chem., 22 (34) 17470–17475 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang, H, Zhu, Q, Zhang, Y, Wang, Y, Zhao, L, Yu, B, “One-Pot Synthesis and Hierarchical Assembly of Hollow Cu2O Microspheres with Nanocrystals-Composed Porous Multishell and Their Gas-Sensing Properties.” Adv. Funct. Mater., 17 (15) 2766–2771 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, J, Liu, J, Peng, Q, Wang, X, Li, Y, “Nearly Monodisperse Cu2O and CuO Nanospheres: Preparation and Applications for Sensitive Gas Sensors.” Chem. Mater., 18 (4) 867–871 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhou, L, Shen, F, Tian, X, Wang, D, Zhang, T, Chen, W, “Stable Cu2O Nanocrystals Grown on Functionalized Graphene Sheets and Room Temperature H2S Gas Sensing with Ultrahigh Sensitivity.” Nanoscale, 5 (4) 1564–1569 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu, L, Huang, Y, Zhang, F, Chen, Q, “CuO/Cu2O Composite Hollow Polyhedrons Fabricated from Metal-Organic Framework Templates for Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes with a Long Cycling Life.” Nanoscale, 5 (10) 4186–4190 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paolella, A, Brescia, R, Prato, M, Povia, M, Marras, S, De Trizio, L, Falqui, A, Manna, L, George, C, “Colloidal Synthesis of Cuprite (Cu2O) Octahedral Nanocrystals and Their Electrochemical Lithiation.” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 5 (7) 2745–2751 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    de Jongh, PE, Vanmaekelbergh, D, Kelly, JJ, “Cu2O: Catalyst for the Photochemical Decomposition of Water?” Chem. Commun., 12 1069–1070 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hara, M, Kondo, T, Komoda, M, Ikeda, S, Kondo, JN, Domen, K, Hara, M, Shinohara, K, Tanaka, A, “Cu2O as a Photocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting Under Visible Light Irradiation.” Chem. Commun., 3 357–358 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cao, H, Qian, X, Zai, J, Yin, J, Zhu, Z, “Conversion of Cu2O Nanocrystals into Hollow Cu2-xSe Nanocages with the Preservation of Morphologies.” Chemical Communications, 43 4548–4550 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sun, S, Yang, Z, “Cu2O-Templated Strategy for Synthesis of Definable Hollow Architectures.” Chem. Commun., 50 (56) 7403–7415 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, D-F, Zhang, H, Guo, L, Zheng, K, Han, X-D, Zhang, Z, “Delicate Control of Crystallographic Facet-oriented Cu2O Nanocrystals and the Correlated Adsorption Ability.” J. Mater. Chem., 19 (29) 5220–5225 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hua, Q, Shang, D, Zhang, W, Chen, K, Chang, S, Ma, Y, Jiang, Z, Yang, J, Huang, W, “Morphological Evolution of Cu2O Nanocrystals in an Acid Solution: Stability of Different Crystal Planes.” Langmuir, 27 (2) 665–671 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yebra, DM, Kiil, S, Dam-Johansen, K, “Antifouling Technology—Past, Present and Future Steps Towards Efficient and Environmentally Friendly Antifouling Coatings.” Prog. Org. Coat., 50 (2) 75–104 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Omae, I, “General Aspects of Tin-Free Antifouling Paints.” Chem. Rev., 103 (9) 3431–3448 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lejars, M, Margaillan, A, Bressy, C, “Fouling Release Coatings: A Nontoxic Alternative to Biocidal Antifouling Coatings.” Chem. Rev., 112 (8) 4347–4390 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ferry, JD, Carritt, DE, “Action of Antifouling Paints.” Ind. Eng. Chem., 38 (6) 612–617 (1946)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ferry, JD, Riley, GA, “Action of Antifouling Paints.” Ind. Eng. Chem., 38 (7) 699–701 (1946)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kiil, S, Weinell, CE, Pedersen, MS, Dam-Johansen, K, “Analysis of Self-Polishing Antifouling Paints Using Rotary Experiments and Mathematical Modeling.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40 (18) 3906–3920 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yu, X, Wang, K, Chen, Z, Yu, H, Xiao, L, Gui, T, “Research on Leaching Rate & Degradation Behavior of Cu2O Contained in Antifouling Paints.” Paint Coat. Ind., 42 (7) 45–52 (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kiil, S, Dam-Johansen, K, Weinell, CE, Pedersen, MS, “Seawater-Soluble Pigments and Their Potential Use in Self-Polishing Antifouling Paints: Simulation-Based Screening Tool.” Prog. Org. Coat., 45 (4) 423–434 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kiil, S, Dam-Johansen, K, Weinell, CE, Pedersen, MS, Codolar, SA, “Dynamic Simulations of a Self-Polishing Antifouling Paint Exposed to Seawater.” J. Coat. Technol., 74 (929) 45–54 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kiil, S, Weinell, CE, Pedersen, MS, Dam-Johansen, K, “Mathematical Modelling of a Self-Polishing Antifouling Paint Exposed to Seawater: A Parameter Study.” Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 80 (1) 45–52 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yebra, DM, Kiil, S, Weinell, CE, Dam-Johansen, K, “Dissolution Rate Measurements of Sea Water Soluble Pigments for Antifouling Paints: ZnO.” Prog. Org. Coat., 56 (4) 327–337 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kiil, S, Dam-Johansen, K, “Characterization of Pigment-Leached Antifouling Coatings Using BET Surface Area Measurements and Mercury Porosimetry.” Prog. Org. Coat., 60 (3) 238–247 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nikam, AV, Arulkashmir, A, Krishnamoorthy, K, Kulkarni, AA, Prasad, BLV, “pH-Dependent Single-Step Rapid Synthesis of CuO and Cu2O Nanoparticles from the Same Precursor.” Cryst. Growth Des., 14 (9) 4329–4334 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shevchenko, EV, Talapin, DV, Schnablegger, H, Kornowski, A, Festin, Ö, Svedlindh, P, Haase, M, Weller, H, “Study of Nucleation and Growth in the Organometallic Synthesis of Magnetic Alloy Nanocrystals: The Role of Nucleation Rate in Size Control of CoPt3 Nanocrystals.” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 125 (30) 9090–9101 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Coatings Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Low-Dimensional Materials Genome Initiative, College of Chemistry and Environmental EngineeringShenzhen UniversityShenzhenChina
  2. 2.Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of ChemistryChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations