Advertisement

Journal of Coatings Technology and Research

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 65–73 | Cite as

Fluid-dynamic properties and wetting behavior of coating inks for roll-to-roll production of polymer-based solar cells

  • L. Wengeler
  • K. Peters
  • M. Schmitt
  • T. Wenz
  • P. Scharfer
  • W. Schabel
Article

Abstract

In the last decade, semiconducting and conducting materials were developed that can be processed by solvent-based deposition to form functional layers or complete electronic devices. These materials are typically synthesized in laboratory scale quantities and tested on small spin-coated substrates, whereas the final goal is to produce them on flexible substrates in a continuous roll-to-roll process. To enable a fast scale up and optimization, fluid-dynamic properties have to be known. Here, we present viscosity and surface tension data for typical material systems, applied in polymer-based solar cells. Materials presented include water-based polymer dispersions (hole-conducting and high-conductive PEDOT:PSS types), solvent-based anorganic nanoparticle dispersions (silver nanoparticle ink, hole-blocking ZnO nanoparticle ink), and dissolved organic molecules and polymers (P3HT:PCBM photoactive blend). Predictive models are proposed to approximate viscosity and surface tension for these materials at various compositions. As well, corona treatment is used to modify the surface energy of P3HT:PCBM and described as a function of web speed and corona power. The importance of material properties is demonstrated by predicting stable conditions for a slot-die coating process. A simple drying simulation highlights the possibility of using property models to investigate wetting problems.

Keywords

Polymer solar cell Organic photovoltaic Printed electronics Surface tension Viscosity Surface energy Wetting Coating Slot die PEDOT:PSS P3HT PCBM ZnO nanoparticles Ag nanoparticles Corona Surfactant Triton Surfactant 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Baden-Württemberg-Stiftung.

References

  1. 1.
    Brabec, CJ, Organic Photovoltaics Materials, Device Physics, and Manufacturing Technologies. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2008Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peet, J, et al., “The Role of Processing in the Fabrication and Optimization of Plastic Solar Cells.” Adv. Mater., 21 (14–15) 1521–1527 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Research Cell Efficiency Records (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krebs, FC, et al., “A Complete Process for Production of Flexible Large Area Polymer Solar Cells Entirely Using Screen Printing—First Public Demonstration.” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 93 (4) 422–441 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kopola, P, et al., “High Efficient Plastic Solar Cells Fabricated with a High-Throughput Gravure Printing Method.” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 94 1673–1680 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blankenburg, L, et al., “Reel-to-Reel Wet Coating as an Efficient Up-Scaling Technique for the Production of Bulk-Heterojunction Polymer Solar Cells.” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 93 (4) 476–483 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Galagan, Y, et al., “Technology Development for Roll-to-Roll Production of Organic Photovoltaics.” Chem. Eng. Process., 50 (5–6) 454–461 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Park, HJ, et al., “A Facile Route to Polymer Solar Cells with Optimum Morphology Readily Applicable to a Roll-to-Roll Process Without Sacrificing High Device Performances.” Adv. Mater., 22 E247–E253 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zimmermann, B, et al., “ITO-Free Flexible Inverted Organic Solar Cell Modules with High Fill Factor Prepared by Slot Die Coating.” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 95 (7) 1587–1589 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steim, R, et al., “Organic Photovoltaics for Low Light Applications.” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 95 (12) 3256–3261 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Wengeler, L, et al., “Comparison of Large Scale Coating Techniques for Organic and Hybrid Films in Polymer Based Solar Cells.” Chem. Eng. Process. (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2012.03.004
  13. 13.
    Wengeler, L, et al., “Investigations on Knife and Slot Die Coating and Processing of Polymer Nanoparticle Films for Hybrid Polymer Solar Cells.” Chem. Eng. Process., 50 (5–6) 478–482 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Helgesen, M, Sondergaard, R, Krebs, FC, “Advanced Materials and Processes for Polymer Solar Cell Devices.” J. Mater. Chem., 20 (1) 36–60 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Macosko, C, Larson, R, Rheology: Principles, Measurements, and Applications. Wiley-VCH, New York, 1994Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yaws, C, Chemical Properties Handbook: Physical Thermodynamic, Environmental, Transport, Safety and Health Related Properties for Organic and Inorganic Chemicals. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1999Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gonzalez, B, et al., “Density, Dynamic Viscosity, and Derived Properties of Binary Mixtures of Methanol or Ethanol with Water, Ethyl Acetate, and Methyl Acetate at T = (293.15, 298.15, and 303.15) K.” J. Chem. Thermodyn., 39 (12) 1578–1588 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dimitriev, OP, et al., “PEDOT:PSS Films—Effect of Organic Solvent Additives and Annealing on the Film Conductivity.” Synth. Met., 159 (21–22) 2237–2239 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Voigt, MM, et al., “Gravure Printing Inverted Organic Solar Cells: The Influence of Ink Properties on Film Quality and Device Performance.” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 105 77–85 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Teja, AS, Rice, P, “Generalized Corresponding States Method for the Viscosities of Liquid-Mixtures.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 20 (1) 77–81 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jasper, JJ, “The Surface Tension of Pure Liquid Compounds.” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1 (4) 841–1010 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Connors, KA, Wright, JL, “Dependence of Surface Tension on Composition of Binary Aqueous-Organic Solutions.” Anal. Chem., 61 (3) 194–198 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wolf, R, Sparavigna, AC, “Role of Plasma Surface Treatments on Wetting and Adhesion.” Engineering, 2 (6) 397–402 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Coatings Association & Oil and Colour Chemists' Association 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Wengeler
    • 1
  • K. Peters
    • 1
  • M. Schmitt
    • 1
  • T. Wenz
    • 1
  • P. Scharfer
    • 1
  • W. Schabel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Thermal Process Engineering, Thin Film Technology (TFT)Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations