Skip to main content
Log in

The dependence of pendulum hardness on the thickness of acrylic coating

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Coatings Technology and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pendulum hardness, which is widely used in the characterization of organic coatings, depends greatly on the thickness of the coating. However, it is still unclear whether a qualitative or quantitative relationship exists between pendulum hardness and coating thickness. In the present article, the pendulum hardness values of acrylic coatings with different thicknesses are measured using a König pendulum hardness tester to clarify the dependence of pendulum hardness on thickness of coating. The results show that the pendulum hardness of acrylic coatings decreases gradually with the increasing thickness of coating within a thickness range, and the sensitivity of pendulum hardness to thickness of coating depends greatly on the glass transition temperature of the coatings. An equation suitable for describing the relationship between logarithmic decrement of the amplitude of pendulum's oscillation and thickness of coating is presented, which can separate the contributions of substrate and coating on the logarithmic decrement. This study demonstrates that the measured value of pendulum hardness is not the bulk hardness value for the coating but the representative value of the system consisting of substrate and coating. An excellent correlation between pendulum hardness and thickness of acrylic coatings is obtained, which is fairly supported by the experimental data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Choi, JH, Kim, HJ, “Three Hardness Test Methods and Their Relationship on UV-Curable Epoxy Acrylate Coatings for Wooden Flooring Systems.” J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 12 (3) 412–417 (2006)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wei, PJ, Lin, JF, “A New Method Developed to Evaluate both the Hardness and Elastic Modulus of a Coating-Substrate System.” Surf. Coat. Technol., 200 (7) 2489–2496 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Iost, A, Najjar, D, Hellouin, R, “Modelling of the Vickers Hardness of Paint Coatings Deposited on Metallic Substrates.” Surf. Coat. Technol., 165 (2) 126–132 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernandes, JV, Menezes, LF, Trindade, AC, “The Coated Surface Hardness: A Kinematic Model.” Thin Solid Films, 335 (1–2) 153–159 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernandes, JV, Trindade, AC, Menezes, LF, Cavaleiro, A, “A Model for Coated Surface Hardness.” Surf. Coat. Technol., 131 (1–3) 457–461 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Iost, A, Bigot, R, “Hardness of Coatings.” Surf. Coat. Technol., 80 (1–2) 117–120 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, J, Bull, SJ, “On the Factors Affecting the Critical Indenter Penetration for Measurement of Coating Hardness.” Vacuum, 83 (6) 911–920 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dashtizadeh, A, Abdouss, M, Mahdavi, H, Khorassani, M, “Acrylic Coatings Exhibiting Improved Hardness, Solvent Resistance and Glossiness by Using Silica Nano-Composites.” Appl. Surf. Sci., 257 (6) 2118–2125 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moon, JI, Lee, YH, Kim, HJ, “Synthesis and Characterization of Elastomeric Polyester Coatings for Automotive Pre-coated Metal.” Prog. Org. Coat., 74 (1) 125–133 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moon, JI, Lee, YH, Kim, HJ, Schwartz, S, Rafailovich, M, Sokolov, J, “Investigation of the Peel Test for Measuring Self-Cleanable Characteristic of Fluorine-Modified Coatings.” Polym. Test., 31 (3) 433–438 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Salleh, NGN, Yhaya, MF, Hassan, A, Bakar, AA, Mokhtar, M, “Effect of UV/EB Radiation Dosages on the Properties of Nanocomposite Coatings.” Radiat. Phys. Chem., 80 (2) 136–141 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jian, Z, Yong, H, Ming, X, Jun, N, “Preparation and Properties of Dual-Cure Polyurethane Acrylate.” Prog. Org. Coat., 66 (1) 35–39 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kivit, PJJ, Aramendia, E, Cabrera, AA, Rios, LM, “Water-Based Coatings Based on Mixtures of Acrylic Dispersions and Alkyd Emulsions.” Macromol. Symp., 283–284 (1) 290–299 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cho, JD, Hong, JW, “UV-Initiated Free Radical and Cationic Photopolymerizations of Acrylate/Epoxide and Acrylate/Vinyl Ether Hybrid Systems With and Without Photosensitizer.” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 93 (3) 1473–1483 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fink-Jensen, P, Hardness Testing of Organic Coatings Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1st ed. Butterworths, London (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hwang, HD, Lee, BH, Choi, JH, Kim, HJ, Chung, WY, “Acoustic Property and Hardness of Coatings for Musical Instruments with Various Coating Thicknesses.” Mokchae Konghak, 34 (2) 58–67 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sato, K, “Physical Significance of the Pendulum Hardness of Coatings Films.” J. Coat. Technol., 56 (708) 47–57 (1984)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinli Jing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, X., Qiao, Z., Huang, Z. et al. The dependence of pendulum hardness on the thickness of acrylic coating. J Coat Technol Res 10, 433–439 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-013-9477-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-013-9477-3

Keywords

Navigation