Advertisement

Journal of Coatings Technology and Research

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 485–492 | Cite as

Process limits in two-layer reverse roll transfer

  • M. SasakiEmail author
  • W. J. Suszynski
  • M. S. Carvalho
  • L. F. Francis
Article
  • 287 Downloads

Abstract

Reverse roll coating in which a thin single layer of liquid is applied onto a substrate has been used in industry for decades and has been extensively analyzed in the literature. Modern coatings, however, are often composed of more than one layer to improve the product performance and to reduce the manufacturing cost. Premetered methods such as slot, slide, and curtain coatings are typically used to produce such multilayer coatings. If the caliper of the substrate to be coated is not constant, then the coating gap and consequently the final film thickness deposited on the web will also be nonuniform. In this study, we focused on the use of reverse roll technique with slot die liquid delivery system to produce a uniform thin two-layer coating. The use of this coating technique to produce such a coating has not been previously explored. The liquid film surface as it is transferred from a rigid steel roll to a deformable urethane-covered roll was visualized to find out how the uniformity of the two-layer coating is affected by the speed ratio between two rolls, layers’ wet thicknesses, and liquid viscosities. The effect of these parameters on the ribbing frequency and amplitude was also investigated. The results show that in the two-layer coating, as in the single layer reverse transfer, there is a critical web speed above which ribbing occurs. The critical speed is determined by the bottom layer viscosity.

Keywords

Multilayered coating Reverse roll Ribbing Visualization 

References

  1. 1.
    Ho, WS, Holland, FM, “Between-Roll Metering Coating Technique, a Theoretical and Experimental Study.” TAPPI, 61 53 (1978)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dicarlo, MJ, “Reverse Roll Coating—Experiments and Theory.” Master’s thesis, University of Minnesota, 1986Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coyle, DJ, Macosko, CW, Scriven, LE, “The Fluid Dynamics of Reverse Roll Coating.” AIChE J., 36 161 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson, TJ, “Reverse Deformable Roll Coating Analysis.” Master’s thesis, University of Minnesota, 1996Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen, D, “Two-Layer Slot Coating Flow Visualization and Modelling.” Master’s thesis, University of Minnesota, 1993Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Musson, LC, “Two-Layer Slot Coating.” PhD thesis, University of Minnesota. University Microfilms International, 2001Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nam, J, Carvalho, MS, “Mid-Gap Invasion in Two-Layer Slot Coating.” J. Fluid Mech., 631 397 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nam, J, Carvalho, MS, “Flow in Tensioned-Web-Over-Slot Die Coating: Effect of Die Lip Design.” Chem. Eng. Sci., 65 3957 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nam, J, Carvalho, MS, “Two-Layer Tensioned-Web-Over-Slot Die Coating: Effect of Operating Conditions on Coating Window.” Chem. Eng. Sci., 65 4065 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pitts, E, Greiller, J, “The Flow of Thin Liquid Films Between Rollers.” J. Fluid Mech., 11 33 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carvalho, MS, Scriven, LE, “Deformable Roll Coating Flows: Steady State and Linear Perturbation Analysis.” J. Fluid Mech., 339 143 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Coatings Association & Oil and Colour Chemists' Association 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Sasaki
    • 1
    Email author
  • W. J. Suszynski
    • 2
  • M. S. Carvalho
    • 3
  • L. F. Francis
    • 2
  1. 1.JFE Steel CorporationFukuyamaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials ScienceUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations