Theoretical study of the scattering efficiency of rutile titanium dioxide pigments as a function of their spatial dispersion

  • Jean-Claude AugerEmail author
  • Vincent Arnaud Martinez
  • Brian Stout


We propose an original theoretical framework to model the scattering efficiency of white paint films as a function of the volume fraction and spatial state of dispersion of rutile titanium dioxide pigments, taking into account electromagnetic couplings. Numerical calculations are performed using a multiple T matrix formalism on an “elemental” volume extracted from the bulk of the paint and which we model as pigments and fillers in a polymer matrix. Qualitative studies show that, due to the dependent scattering phenomenon, the size of fillers can modulate the magnitude of loss in scattering efficiency by modifying the spatial state of dispersion of the pigments in the polymer matrix. In particular, fillers whose size is comparable to the dimension of the pigments improve the scattering efficiency by impeding crowding. It is also shown that the optical properties of the bulk material at arbitrary concentration can be approximated by extrapolating the optical properties calculated on a limited number of scatterers.


Optical property Opacity Rutile titanium dioxide pigment Dependent scattering Multiple scattering Spatial dispersion T-matrix formalism 



The authors would like to thank Eduardo Nahmad for supporting the opening phase of this work and Richard K. Chang for permitting its conclusion.


  1. 1.
    Diebold, MP, “Technical Challenges for the TiO2 Industry.” JCT CoatingsTech., 1 (1) 36–44 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rutherford, DJ, “Influence of TiO2 Flocculation on the Optical Properties of Alkyd Emulsion Paints.” Euro. Coat. J., 6 (1) 18–27 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harding, RH, Golding, B, Morgen, RA (1960) Optics of Light-Scattering Films. Study of Effects of Pigment Size and Concentration. J. Optic. Soc. Am. 50(5):446–455CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tunstall DF, Hird MJ (1974) Effect of Particle Crowding on Scattering Power of TiO2 Pigments. J. Paint Technol. 46(588):33–40Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braun JH (1988) Crowding and Spacing of Titanium Dioxide Pigments. J. Paint Technol. 60(758):67–71ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stieg, FB Jr, “The Effect of Extenders on the Hiding Power of Titanium Pigments.” Official Digest, January, 52–64 (1959)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Temperley J, Westwood MJ, Hornby MR, Simpson LA (1992) Use of a Mathematical model to predict the effects of extenders on pigment dispersion in Paint films. Pigment Dispers. Paint Film 64(809):33–40Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thiele ES, French RH (1998) Light-Scattering Properties of Representative, Morphological Rutile Titanium Particles Using a Finite-Element Method. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81(3):469–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McNeil LE, Hanuska AR, French RH (2001) Orientation Dependence in Near-Field Scattering from TiO2 particles. Appl. Optic. 40(22):3726–3736. doi: 10.1364/AO.40.003726 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mackowski DW, Mishchenko MI (1996) Calculation of the T Matrix and the Scattering Matrix for Ensembles of Spheres. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13(11):2266–2278CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cruzan OR (1962) Translation Addition Theorems for Spherical Vector Wave Functions. Quart. Appl. Math. 20:33–40zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Waterman PC (1971) Symmetry, Unitary and Geometry in Electromagnetic Scattering. Phys. Rev. D 3:825–839. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.3.825 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mackowski D (1994) Calculation of Total Cross Sections of Multiple-Sphere Clusters. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11(11):2851–2861CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Auger JC, Stout B (2003) A Recursive T-Matrix Algorithm to Solve the Multiple Scattering Equation: Numerical Validation. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer. 79–80:533–547. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4073(02)00306-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Quirantes A, Arroyo F, Quirantes-Ros J (2001) Multiple Light Scattering by Spherical Particle Systems and Its Dependence on Concentration: A T-Matrix Study. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 240(1):78–82. doi: 10.1006/jcis.2001.7641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vargas WE (2003) Optical Properties of Pigmented Coatings Taking into Account Particle Interactions. J. Quant. Spectr. Radiat. Trans. 78(2):187–195CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Auger JC, Stout B, Martinez V (2005) Scattering Efficiency of Aggregated Clusters of Spheres: Dependence on Configuration and Composition. JOSA A 22:2700–2708PubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    “Standard Test Method for Hiding Power of Paints by Reflectometry.” Book of ASTM Standards, D2805–88.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kubelka, P, Munk, F, “Ein Beitrag zur Optik deer Farbanstriche.” Z. Tech. Phys. (Leipzig), 12 593–601 (1931)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Auger JC, Martinez V, Stout B (2007) Absorption and Scattering Properties of Dense Ensemble of Nonspherical Particles. JOSA A 24:3508–3351PubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hottel, HC, Sarofim, AF, Dalzell, WH, Vasalos, IA, “Optical Properties of Coatings, Effect of Pigment Concentration.” AIAA J., 9 (10):1895–1898 (1970)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© FSCT and OCCA 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Claude Auger
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vincent Arnaud Martinez
    • 2
  • Brian Stout
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Laser Diagnostics, Department of Applied PhysicsYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Applied PhysicsRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Institut Fresnel, UMR 6133Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Centre de Saint JérômeMarseilles Cedex 20France

Personalised recommendations