Journal of Coatings Technology and Research

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 285–294 | Cite as

A model for the dehydration of waterborne basecoat

  • Paul Henshaw
  • Lindita Prendi
  • Tony Mancina


In vehicle manufacturing, a common topcoat process sequence is the application of a waterborne basecoat, partial dehydration, application of a solventborne clearcoat, then curing at approximately 150°C. Anecdotal evidence suggests that under “harsh” (high temperature and velocity) dehydration conditions, a skin can be formed, which can trap excess water in the basecoat. Upon curing, the excess water forms vapor that can burst through the topcoat, leading to surface imperfections, termed pinholes or pops.

A forward-time center-distance finite difference model, incorporating only diffusion and evaporation and experimentally determined coefficients, was used to simulate the water concentration in the layers of a paint film. Simulations were conducted at constant temperatures (27°C and 82°C) as well as by using temperature traces from a full-size dehydration oven under harsh (82°C) and gentle (54°C) conditions. The model accurately predicted the overall solids content after dehydration. However, in both temperature scenarios, the surface layer water concentration was less at the low temperature for the same overall solids content. This counter-intuitive finding is attributed to the increase in diffusivity with temperature, which allows water to be supplied to the surface faster in the high temperature run in each scenario. Therefore, this simple diffusion-evaporation model is not suitable for simulating water entrapment leading to popping.


Drying waterborne defects automotive-OEM process modeling simulation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Neag, C.M., “Coatings Characterization by Thermal Analysis,” ASTM Manual 17, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Tardiff, J. and Altermatt, C., “Accelerating Waterborne Flash-Off Time,” Ind. Paint Powder,, published 2002, viewed September 2003.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Blandin, H.P., David, J.C., and Vergnaud, J.M., “Modelling the Drying of Coatings: Effect of the Thickness, Temperature and Concentration of Solvent,” Prog. Org. Coat., 15, 163–172 (1987a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Ion, L. and Vergnaud, J.M., “Process of Drying a Polymeric Paint by Diffusion-Evaporation and Shrinkage. Determination of the Concentration Dependent Diffusivity,” Polym. Test., 14, 479–487 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Blandin, H.P., David, J.C., Vergnaud, J.M., Illien, J.P., and Malizewicz, M., “Modeling of the Drying Process of Coatings with Various Layers,” J. Coat. Technol., 59, No. 746, 27 (1987).Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Blanc, D., Vessot, S., Laurent, P., Gerard, J.F., and Andrieu, J., “Study and Modelling of Coated Car Painting Film by Infrared or Convective Drying,” Drying Technology, 15 (9), 2303–2323 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Crank, J., Mathematics of Diffusion, Oxford University Press, London, 1957.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Waggoner, R.A. and Blum, F.D., “Solvent Diffusion and Drying of Coatings,” J. Coat. Technol., 61, No. 768, 51 (1989).Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Ellis, W.H., “Comparative Solvent Evaporative Mechanisms for Conventional and High Solids Coatings,” J. Coat. Technol., 55, No. 696, 63 (1983).Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Weiss, D., personal communication with Paint and Corrosion Protection, Daimler Chrysler AG, Ulm, Germany (Jan. 20, 2004).Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Padget, J.C., “Polymers for Water-Based Coatings—A Systematic Overview,” J. Coat. Technol., 66, No. 839, 89–105 (1994).Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Stewart, P.A., Hearn, J., and Wilkinson, M.C., “An Overview of Polymer Latex Film Formation and Properties,” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 86, 195–267 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Croll, S.G., “Drying of Latex Paint,” J. Coat. Technol., 58, No. 734, 41 (1986).Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    Devore, J.L., Probability & Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Monterey, CA, 1982.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    Van der Zanden, A.J.J. and Goossens, E.L.J., “The Measurement of the Diffusion Coefficient and the Sorption Isotherm of Water in Paint Films,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 58, 1521–1530 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Okazaki, M., Shioda, K., Masuda, R. and Toei, R., “Drying Mechanism of Coated Film of Polymer Solution,” J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 7 (2), 99–105 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Chapra, S.C., Surface Water-Quality Modeling (Prelim. Ed.), The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    Schröder, M., Untersuchungen zum Trocknungsvorgang bei nass-in-nass applizierten Lackschichten,” Dr.-Ing. Dissertation, Technischen Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany, 2002.Google Scholar
  19. (19).
    Eaton, R.F. and Willeboordse, F.G., “Evaporation Behavior of Organic Cosolvents in Waterborne Formulations,” J. Coat. Technol., 52, No. 660, 63 (1980).Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    Croll, S.G., “Heat and Mass Transfer in Latex Paints During Drying,” J. Coat. Technol., 59, No. 751, 81 (1987).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© OCCA 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Henshaw
    • 2
  • Lindita Prendi
    • 2
  • Tony Mancina
    • 1
  1. 1.DCC/UofW, Automotive Research and Development CentreDaimler Chrysler CanadaWindsorCanada
  2. 2.Dept. Civil & Environmental EngineeringUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations