Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 73–88 | Cite as

The authorship list in science: Junior physicists’ perceptions of who appears and why



A questionnaire probing the distribution of authorship credit was given to postdoctoral associates (“postdocs”) in order to determine their awareness of the professional society’s ethical statement on authorship, the extent of communication with their supervisors about authorship criteria, and the appropriateness of authorship assignments on submitted papers.

Results indicate a low awareness of the professional society’s ethical statement and that little communication takes place between postdocs and supervisors about authorship criteria. A substantial amount of authorship credit given to supervisors and other workers is perceived by the postdocs to violate the professional society’s ethical statement.


Authorship author list intellectual property intellectual credit patent ethical guidelines 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Friedman, P. (1993) Standards for authorship and publication in academic radiology, Association of University Radiologists Ad Hoc Committee on Standards for the Responsible Conduct of Research, Radiology 189: 33–4.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Courtiss, E.H. (1992) Authorship: the listing, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 89: 538–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tarnow, E. (1996) Authorship practices need review, APS News 5: 5.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vasta, R. (1981) The matter of publication credit: a survey of APA members, Journal of Supplement Abstract Service Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 11: 2–3.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swazey, J.P., Anderson, M.S., Lewis, K.S., (1993) Ethical problems in academic research, American Scientist 81: 542–554.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalichman, M., Friedman, P., (1992) A pilot study of biomedical trainees perceptions concerning research ethics, Academic Medicine 67: 767–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eastwood, S., Derish, P., Leash, E., Ordway, S. (1996) Ethical issues in Biomedical Research: Perceptions and Practices of Postdoctoral Research Fellows Responding to a Survey, Science and Engineering Ethics 2: 89–114.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Uniform Requirement for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (1997) Journal of the American Medical Association 277: 927–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zuckerman, H. (1967) Nobel Laureates in Science: Patterns of Productivity, Collaboration, and Authorship, Am. Soc. Rev. 32: 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Swazey, J.P., Louis, K. and Anderson, M. (1994) The ethical training of graduate students requires serious and continuing attention, Chronicle of Higher Education 40: B1–2.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    La Follette, M. (1992), Stealing into print, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tarnow, E. (1991) Scientific authorship — what’s in a name, Physics Today 44: 13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Avalon Business Systems, Inc.RiverdaleUSA

Personalised recommendations