Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 275–282

Serious deviation from accepted practices

  • Donald Buzzelli
Article

Keywords

misconduct definition NSF PHS government regulations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brandt, E.N., Jr. (1983) PHS Perspectives on Misconduct in Science. Public Health Reports 98(2): 136–140, with Revision.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Health Research Extension Act of 1985, Public Law 99–158, Sec. 493, Nov. 20, 1985.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Office of Inspector General, National Science Foundation, Semiannual Report to the Congress No. 9 (1993): 22–24.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Public Health Service (1986) NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts 15(11), (Special Issue) July 18, 1986.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buzzelli, D.E. (1994) NSF’s Definition of Misconduct in Science. Centennial Review XXXVIII: 273–296.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Academy of Sciences (1992) Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, Vol. I.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guenin, L.M. & Davis, B.D. (1996) Scientific Reasoning and Due Process. Science and Engineering Ethics 2: 47–54.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldman, K.A. & Fisher, M.K. (1997) The Constitutionality of the “Other Serious Deviation from Accepted Practices” Clause. Jurimetrics 37: 149–166.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald Buzzelli
    • 1
  1. 1.Washington, D.C.USA

Personalised recommendations