Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 183–198 | Cite as

The history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond

  • Chris B. Pascal
Article

Abstract

This paper looks at the issues and controversies that led to creation of the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) and that dominated its agenda in the early years. The successes and failures of ORI are described and new problems identified. This paper then looks ahead to the future, considering what issues will dominate ORI’s agenda and affect the research institutions, individual scientists, and the scientific community in the next several years.

Keywords

scientific integrity scientific misconduct whistleblowing 

References

  1. 1.
    Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority; Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, 57 Fed. Reg. 24262 (1992), revised 59 Fed. Reg. 2856 (1994).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fraud in Biomedical Research: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight of the House Committee on Science, 97th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 (1981).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brandt, E.N. (1983) PHS perspectives on misconduct in science. Public Health Reports 93:136–140.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Section 493 of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. §289b, as enacted by Public Law 99-158 (Nov. 20, 1985).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    “Responsibilities of Awardee and Applicant Institutions for Dealing With and Reporting Possible Misconduct in Science,” 42 C.F.R. Part 50, Subpart A, 54 Fed. Reg. 32446 (August 8, 1989).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    42 C.F.R. §50.102.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Section 493 of the PHS Act, 42 U.S.C §289b, as amended by the National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act of 1993, Public Law 103-43 (June 10, 1993).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    “Health Research Misconduct: HHS’ Handling of Cases Is Appropriate, but Timeliness Remains a Concern,” at 6–7, GAO/HEHS-95-134 (August 1995).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Notice, 57 Fed. Reg. 53125 (Nov. 6, 1992).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ORI Newsletter 1(4):8 (Sept. 1993).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Notice, 58 Fed. Reg. 33831 (Langlois) (June 21, 1993).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Notice, 58 Fed. Reg. 33832 (Stricker) (June 21, 1993).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    DAB legal ruling in Re: Rameshwar K. Sharma, Ph.D. (May 10, 1993) (unpublished).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anderson, C. (1994) The aftermath of the Gallo case. Science 263: 20–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    DAB Decision No. 1431 (1993).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    DAB Decision No. 1446 (1993).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Notices, 58 Fed. Reg. 33830 (Freisheim) (June 21, 1993); 59 Fed. Reg. 18539 (Hiserodt) (April 19, 1994).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ORI Newsletter 4(1):1 (Dec. 1995); Walker, P. Federal research-integrity office quickens pace of investigations. Chronicle of Higher Education: A32, 33 (April 11, 1997).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    ORI Model Policies and Procedures for Responding to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct (April 1995).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Report of the Commission on Research Integrity: Integrity and Misconduct in Research (1995). The report is available on ORI’s home page at http://ori.dhhs.gov or from ORI upon request.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Implementation Proposals on Recommendations by the Commission on Research Integrity (June 14, 1996), HHS, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    42 C.F.R. 50.103(d)(13).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guidelines for Institutions and Whistleblowers: Responding to Possible Retaliation Against Whistleblowers in Extramural Research (November 1995), ORI, Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    ORI Annual Report: 1996, at 38–43 (November 1997).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dresser, R. (1997) Giving scientists their due: the Imanishi-Kari decision. Hastings Center Report 26–28 (May–June).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    DAB Decision No. 1582 (1996).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    ORI Newsletter 5(1): 6 (Dec. 1996).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Angelides v. Baylor College of Medicine, et al, No. 95-24248 (11th D.C. Harris County, Texas, Aug. 29, 1995).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Angelides v. Baylor College of Medicine, 117 F. 3rd 830 (5th Cir. 1997).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    DAB Decision No. 1677 (1999). The decision is available on the ORI web site at 〈http://ori.dhhs.gov〉.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kaiser, J. (1999) Baylor saga comes to an end. Science 283: 1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    ORI Newsletter 2 (4):1–2 (Sept. 1994); 59 Fed. Reg. 63811 (Dec. 9, 1994).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    See note [a], p. 184.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    National Academy of Sciences (1992) Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, Vol. I, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Semiannual Report to Congress, Office of Inspector General, National Science Foundation, 16:46–48 (October 1996–Mar. 1997).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dustira, A.K. (1996) The Federal role in influencing research ethics education and standards in science. Professional Ethics 5:139–156.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    “Managing Integrity in Research,” a summary of a conference co-sponsored by ORI and the University of Michigan (ORI, March 12, 1998).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    ORI Newsletter 6(1):1–2,7 (Dec. 1997).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gunsalus, C.K. (1998) Preventing the need for whistleblowing: practical advice for university administrators. Science and Engineering Ethics 4: 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Research Triangle Institute (1995) Consequences of Whistleblowing for the Whistleblower in Misconduct in Science Cases. Submitted to the Office of Research Integrity, and (1996) Survey of Accused but Exonerated Individuals in Research Misconduct Cases. Submitted to the Office of Research Integrity. See 〈http://ori.dhhs.gov〉.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    ORI Biennial Report: 1991–92, p. 3, Table 1 (Sept. 1993); ORI Annual Report: 1996, p. 3, Table 2 (Nov. 1997).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    The Internet address for the PHS Administrative Actions Bulletin Board is 〈http://silk.nih.gov/public/cbzlbje.@www.orilist.html〉.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    ORI Newsletter 5 (1): 6 (Dec. 1996).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris B. Pascal
    • 1
  1. 1.Office of Research IntegrityU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesRockvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations