Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 155–170 | Cite as

Scientific limitations and ethical ramifications of a non-representative Human Genome Project: African American response

  • Fatimah Jackson


The Human Genome Project (HGP) represents a massive merging of science and technology in the name of all humanity. While the disease aspects of HGP-generated data have received the greatest publicity and are the strongest rationale for the project, it should be remembered that the HGP has, as its goal the sequencing of all 100,000 human genes and the accurate depiction of the ancestral and functional relationships among these genes. The HGP will thus be constructing the molecular taxonomic norm for humanity. Currently the HGP genomic baseline is almost exclusively skewed toward North Atlantic European lineages through the extensive use of the Centre d’Études du Polymorphisme Humaine (CEPH) data set. More recently, the HGP has shifted to the use of volunteer donors since adequate informed consent had not been secured from the CEPH families. No evidence exists that either the CEPH families or the current volunteers are the most appropriate demographic or evolutionary lineages for the functional genomic studies that will guide production of new DNA based drugs, targeted therapeutics and gene-based diagnostics. The lack of scientific representativeness of the HGP is a serious impediment to its broad applicability. Yet this can be remedied, and five alternative sampling strategies are presented. In response to the current exclusionary design of the HGP, there is noteworthy caution and skepticism in the African American community concerning genetic studies. The Manifesto on Genomic Studies Among African Americans reflects both a desire to be systematically included in federally funded genomic studies and a desire to maintain some control over the interpretation and application of research results. Representative sampling in the HGP is seen as an international human rights issue with domestic ethical implications.


Human Genome Project taxonomy functional genomics African American ethics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lander, E.S. (1996) The new genomics: Global views on biology, Science (25 Oct) 274: 536–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guyer, M.S. & Collins, F.S. (1995) How is the Human Genome Project doing, and what have we learned so far?, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92: 10841–10848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leffers, H., Dejgaard, K., Honore, B., Madsen, P., Nielsen, M.S. & Celis, J.E. (1996) cDNA expression and human two-dimensional gel protein databases: Towards integrating DNA and protein information, Electrophoresis 17(11): 1713–1719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baba, Y. (1996) Analysis of disease-causing genes and DNA-based drugs by capillary electrophoresis: Towards DNA diagnosis and gene therapy for human diseases, Journal of Chromatography 687: 271–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dykes, C.W. (1996) Genes, disease and medicine, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 42: 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., Menozzi, P. & Piazza, A. (1994) The History and Geography of Human Genes, Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang, K. (1997) UM Professor Questions Diversity of the HGP, Baltimore Sun, Maryland Section, Feb. 22, pp. 1B, 3B.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wills, C. (1991) Exons, Introns, and Talking Genes: The Science Behind the Human Genome Project, Harper Collins: New York, pp. 277–279.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Phoenix, D.D., Lybrook, S.M., Trottier, R.W., Hodgin, F.C. & Crandall, L.A. (1995) Sickle cell screening policies as portent: How will the Human Genome Project affect public sector genetic services? Journal of the National Medical Association 87: 807–812.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murray, R. (1996) Clinical perspectives on human genomic testing: Contrasting sickle cell versus Tay-Sachs screening programs in the US. Paper presented, at Health Law Conference, Seton Hall Law School, Newark, NJ, November 4, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weiss, K.M. (1996) Is there a paradigm shift in genetics? Lessons from the study of human diseases, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5(1):259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsui, L-C. (1992) The spectrum of cystic fibrosis mutations. Trends in Genetics 8: 391–398.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Analysis Consortium (CFGAC) (1994) Population variation of common cystic fibrosis mutations, Human Mutation 4: 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kittles, R., Perola, M., Peltonen, L., Bergen, A., Aragon, R., Virkkunen, M., Linnoila, M., Goldman, D. & Long, J. (1998) Dual origins of Finns revealed by Y-chromosome haplotype variation, American Journal of Human Genetics 62 (in press).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peltonen, L., Pekkarinen, P. & Aaltonen, J. (1995) Messages from an isolate: Lessons from the Finnish gene pool, Biological Chemistry Hoppe-Seyler 376: 697–704.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miklos, G.L.G. & Rubin, G.M. (1996) The role of the genome project in determining gene function: Insights from model organisms, Cell 86: 521–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hernandez, D. & Fisher, E.M.C. (1996) Down syndrome genetics: Unraveling a multifactorial disorder, Human Molecular Genetics 5 (REV. ISSUE): 1411–1416.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coughlin, S.S., Etheredge, G.D., Metayer, C., Martin, S.A., Jr. (1996) Remember Tuskegee: Public Health student knowledge of the ethical significance of the Tuskegee syphilis study., American Journal of Preventive Medicine 12: 242–246.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brown, R. & Henderson, J. (1983) The mass production and distribution of HeLa cells at Tuskegee Institute 1953–1959, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 38:415–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cold, M. (1986) A Conspiracy of Cells: One Woman’s Immortal Legacy and the Medical Scandal it Caused, State University of NY Press: Albany.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karp, L. (1976) The immortality of a cancer victim dead since 1951, Smithsonian Magazine (March), pp. 51–56.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marks, J. (1995) Human Biodiversity: genes, race, and history, Aldine de Gruyter: New York, NY.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jackson, F.L.C. (1997a) The taxonomic implications of the HGP, American Journal of Human Biology 9:130.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jackson, F.L.C. (1997b) Correlation of geographic patterns of ecological diversity and ethnic variation in Africa: Implications for identifying gene X environment interactions and patterns of human genetic heterogeneity, Amer. Journal of Human Biology 9:12.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Relethford, J.H. (1996) Genetic distance can obscure population history: Problem and solution, Human Biology 68:29–44.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kahn, P. (1994) An African-American diversity project, Science 266: 721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mittman, I.S. (1997) Commentary: We must all be equal partners in the new age of genetics, The Scientist (October 13) 11(20): 8.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Munayyer, M.F. (1997) Genetic testing and germ-line manipulation: Constructing a new language for international human rights, American University Journal of International Law and Policy 12: 687–731.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rollin, B.E. (1996) Ideology, “value-free science”, and animal welfare. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A Animal Science 0 (SUPPL. 27): 5–10.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Start, R.D., Brown, W., Bryant, R.J., Reed, M.W., Cross, S.S., Kent, G. & Underwood, J.C.E. (1996) Ownership and uses of surgical inpatients?, British Medical Journal 313: 1366–1368.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Clasa, J., Holoman, J., Klepance, J. & Soltes, L. (1996) Ethics committees and achievement of good clinical practice. Therapie (Paris) 51: 369–372.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gillett, C.R. (1995) Medical ethics in a multicultural context, Journal of Internal Medicine 238: 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Berg, K., Pettersson, U., Riis, P. & Tranoy, K.E. (1995) Genetics in democratic societies: The Nordic perspective, Clinical Genetics 48: 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jackson, F. (1996) Assessing the Human Genome Project: An African American and bioanthropological critique. Paper presented at Tuskegee University Human Genome Conference, September 26, 1996.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Population Reference Bureau (1997) World Population Figures, Mid-Year 1997, PRB: Arlington, VA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fatimah Jackson
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Anthropology and BiologyThe University of Maryland-College ParkCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations