Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: A survey of graduate students in experimental sciences
- 178 Downloads
In recent years, programs for training in research ethics have become widespread, but very little has been done to assess the effectiveness of this training. Because initial studies have failed to demonstrate a positive impact of research ethics training, this project defined two new outcome variables to be tested in a sample of graduate students at the University of California, San Diego. Trainees were surveyed to assess the role of ethics training in altering their perceptions about their own standards, or their knowledge of options available to them if faced with ethical problems that might arise in conducting and reporting research. In response to a mailing of 505 anonymous questionnaires, 283 replies were received. Similar to previous studies, perceptions of standards were not significantly affected by hours spent in informal discussions about research ethics, in attending courses on research ethics, or in discussions of case studies. However, self-reported knowledge of options for facing research ethics problems was significantly increased in association with increased hours of discussion, class time, or case study discussion. Taken together, this study emphasizes the need for increased attention to the definition and assessment of the goals of research ethics training.
Keywordsethics misconduct responsible conduct of research standards survey
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Eastwood, S., Derish, P., Leash, E., & Ordway, S. (1996) Ethical issues in biomedical research: perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey. Science and Engineering Ethics 2: 89–114.Google Scholar
- 5.Bebeau, M.J. & Thoma, S.J. (1994) Can ethics be taught? A look at the evidence: revisited. New York State Dental Journal 60: 51–7.Google Scholar
- 6.Bebeau, M.J. & Tohma, S.J. (1994) The impact of a dental ethics curriculum on moral reasoning. Journal of Dental Education 58: 684–692.Google Scholar
- 8.Fowler, F.J., Jr. (1993) Survey Research Methods, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, California.Google Scholar
- 9.Rest, J.R. (1994) Background: Theory and research. In: (Rest, J.R., Narvaez, D., eds.) Moral Development in the Professions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
- 10.Anderson, M.S. (1996) Collaboration, the doctoral experience, and the departmental environment. The Review of Higher Education 19: 305–326.Google Scholar
- 11.Anderson, M.S. (1996) Misconduct and departmental context: Evidence from the Acadia Institute’s Graduate Education Project. Journal of Information Ethics 5: 15–33.Google Scholar
- 12.Swazey, J.P., Anderson, M.S., & Louis, K.S. (1993) Ethical problems in academic research: A survey of doctoral candidates and faculty raises important questions about the ethical environment of graduate education and research. American Scientist 81: 542–553.Google Scholar