Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 51–64 | Cite as

How to blow the Whistle and still have a career afterwards

Article

Abstract

Filing charges of scientific misconduct can be a risky and dangerous endeavor. This article presents rules of conduct to follow when considering whether to report perceived misconduct, and a set of step-by-step procedures for responsible whistleblowing that describe how to do so once the decision to report misconduct has been made. This advice is framed within the university setting, and may not apply fully in industrial settings.

Keywords

ethics policies scientific misconduct young scientists whistleblowing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    On Being a Scientist: Responsible Conduct in Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy of the National Academy of Sciences (National Academy Press, 1995), second edition, p. 18.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guidelines for Ethical Practices in Research, Office of Research Integrity at the University of Pittsburgh, May 1997, p. 7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, Volume I, National Academy of Sciences (National Academy Press, 1992), recommendation 11, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of IllinoisChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations