Accommodating an Uninvited Guest: Perspectives of Researchers in Switzerland on ‘Honorary’ Authorship
The aim of this paper is to analyze the attitudes and reactions of researchers towards an authorship claim made by a researcher in a position of authority who has not made any scientific contribution to a manuscript or helped to write it. This paper draws on semi-structured interviews conducted with 33 researchers at three seniority levels working in biomedicine and the life sciences in Switzerland. This manuscript focuses on the analysis of participants’ responses when presented with a vignette describing an authorship assignment dilemma within a research group. The analysis indicates that researchers use a variety of explanations and arguments to justify inclusion of what guidelines would describe as honorary or guest authorship. Fuzzy parameters such as “substantial contribution” lead to varied interpretation and consequently convenient application of authorship guidelines in practice. Factors such as the culture of the research group, the values and practice shaped by the research leaders, the hierarchy and relative (perceived) positions of power within research institutions, and the importance given to publications as the currency for academic success and growth tend to have a strong influence on authorship practice. Unjustified authorship assignment practices can be reduced to some extent by creating empowering research cultures where each researcher irrespective of his/her career stage feels empowered to confidently raise concerns without fearing adverse impact on their professional lives. However, individual researchers and research institutions currently have limited influence on established methods for evaluating academic success, which is primarily based on the number of high impact publications.
KeywordsAuthorship assignment Guest authorship Research integrity Qualitative research Switzerland
This study was funded by the Käthe-Zingg-Schwichtenberg Fonds of the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences received by Dr. David M. Shaw.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
None necessary according to the Research Ethics Committee of Northwestern and Central Switzerland. This interview study was considered unproblematic from an ethical point of view.
- Aguzzi, A. (2015). Authoring scientific papers: A perspective from the trenches. Swiss Medical Weekly,145, w14107.Google Scholar
- Cell. (2019). Information for Authors: Authorship. Retrieved September 3, 2019 from http://www.cell.com/cell/authors.
- Gilmore, J., Strickland, D., Timmerman, B., Maher, M., & Feldon, D. (2010). Weeds in the flower garden: An exploration of plagiarism in graduate students’ research proposals and its connection to enculturation, ESL, and contextual factors. International Journal for Educational Integrity,6(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.21913/IJEI.v6i1.673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2017). Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. Retrieved September 3, 2019 from http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html.
- Lu, Y., Jones, D. J., Sharara, N., Kaltenbach, T., Laine, L., McQuaid, K., et al. (2017). Transparency ethics in practice: Revisiting financial conflicts of interest disclosure forms in clinical practice guidelines. PLoS ONE,12(8), e0182856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lundh, A., Barbateskovic, M., Hróbjartsson, A., & Gøtzsche, P. C. (2010). Conflicts of interest at medical journals: The influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue–cohort study. PLoS Medicine,7(10), e1000354. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nature (2019). Nature Research journals’ authorship policy. Retrieved September 3, 2019 from http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/authorship.html.
- Nature Geoscience (2017). [Editorial]. Where credit is due 10, 323, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2949.
- Neuman, J., Korenstein, D., Ross, J. S., & Keyhani, S. (2011). Prevalence of financial conflicts of interest among panel members producing clinical practice guidelines in Canada and United States: Cross sectional study. British Medical Journal,343, d5621. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. (2012). Retrieved September 3, 2019 from https://sfdora.org/.
- Science (2018). Science journals editorial policies: Authorship. Retrieved September 3, 2019 from http://www.sciencemag.org/authors/science-journals-editorial-policies.